• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在澳大利亚的老年人居住护理环境中引入消费者导向型护理:公民陪审团的观点。

Introducing consumer directed care in residential care settings for older people in Australia: views of a citizens' jury.

机构信息

1 NHMRC-ARC Dementia Research Development Fellow, Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, South Australia.

2 Research Fellow, Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Flinders University, South Australia.

出版信息

J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):176-184. doi: 10.1177/1355819618764223. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1177/1355819618764223
PMID:29523047
Abstract

Objectives Health services worldwide are increasingly adopting consumer directed care approaches. Traditionally, consumer directed care models have been implemented in home care services and there is little guidance as to how to implement them in residential care. This study used a citizens' jury to elicit views of members of the public regarding consumer directed care in residential care. Methods A citizens' jury involving 12 members of the public was held over two days in July 2016, exploring the question: For people with dementia living in residential care facilities, how do we enable increased personal decision making to ensure that care is based on their needs and preferences? Jury members were recruited through a market research company and selected to be broadly representative of the general public. Results The jury believed that person-centred care should be the foundation of care for all older people. They recommended that each person's funding be split between core services (to ensure basic health, nutrition and hygiene needs are met) and discretionary services. Systems needed to be put into place to enable the transition to consumer directed care including care coordinators to assist in eliciting resident preferences, supports for proxy decision makers, and accreditation processes and risk management strategies to ensure that residents with significant cognitive impairment are not taken advantage of by goods and service providers. Transparency should be increased (perhaps using technologies) so that both the resident and nominated family members can be sure that the person is receiving what they have paid for. Conclusions The views of the jury (as representatives of the public) were that people in residential care should have more say regarding the way in which their care is provided and that a model of consumer directed care should be introduced. Policy makers should consider implementation of consumer directed care models that are economically viable and are associated with high levels of satisfaction among users.

摘要

目的

全球卫生服务机构越来越多地采用以消费者为导向的护理方法。传统上,消费者导向的护理模式已在家庭护理服务中实施,但对于如何在住宿护理中实施这些模式,几乎没有指导。本研究使用公民陪审团来征求公众对住宿护理中消费者导向护理的看法。

方法

2016 年 7 月,为期两天的公民陪审团由 12 名公众成员参加,探讨了以下问题:对于居住在住宿护理设施中的痴呆症患者,我们如何增加个人决策,以确保护理基于他们的需求和偏好?陪审团成员通过市场研究公司招募,并选择广泛代表公众。

结果

陪审团认为以患者为中心的护理应该是所有老年人护理的基础。他们建议每个人的资金分为核心服务(以确保满足基本健康、营养和卫生需求)和可自由支配的服务。需要建立系统,使向以消费者为导向的护理过渡,包括护理协调员协助确定患者偏好、为代理决策者提供支持,以及认证程序和风险管理策略,以确保认知障碍严重的患者不会受到商品和服务提供商的利用。应该增加透明度(也许使用技术),以便居民和指定的家庭成员都可以确信他们已经支付了所得到的服务。

结论

陪审团(作为公众代表)的意见是,居住在住宿护理中的人应该对提供护理的方式有更多的发言权,应该引入以消费者为导向的护理模式。政策制定者应考虑实施经济可行且与用户满意度高相关的以消费者为导向的护理模式。

相似文献

1
Introducing consumer directed care in residential care settings for older people in Australia: views of a citizens' jury.在澳大利亚的老年人居住护理环境中引入消费者导向型护理:公民陪审团的观点。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2018 Jul;23(3):176-184. doi: 10.1177/1355819618764223. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
2
Are people in residential care entitled to receive rehabilitation services following hip fracture? Views of the public from a citizens' jury.居住在养老院的人在髋部骨折后是否有权接受康复服务?来自公民陪审团的公众意见。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 May 12;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01575-y.
3
Eliciting youth and adult recommendations through citizens' juries to improve school based adolescent immunisation programs.通过公民陪审团征求青年和成人的建议,以改进学校青少年免疫接种计划。
Vaccine. 2014 May 1;32(21):2434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.02.098. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
4
Evaluating the use of citizens' juries in food policy: a case study of food regulation.评估公民陪审团在食品政策中的使用:以食品监管为例。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jun 19;13:596. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-596.
5
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.公民陪审团在卫生政策决策中的应用:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
6
Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?医疗保健公民陪审团中的消费者声音重要吗?
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12397. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
7
Assessing the impact of deliberative processes on the views of participants: is it 'in one ear and out the other'?评估审议过程对参与者观点的影响:是“一听了之”吗?
Health Expect. 2014 Apr;17(2):278-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00749.x. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
8
Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.规划研究重点中的公民陪审团:过程、参与度与结果
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00502.x.
9
Obtaining consumer perspectives using a citizens' jury: does the current country of origin labelling in Australia allow for informed food choices?通过公民陪审团获取消费者观点:澳大利亚目前的原产国标签是否有助于做出明智的食品选择?
BMC Public Health. 2016 Dec 9;16(1):1241. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3900-5.
10
Citizens' Jury and Elder Care: Public Participation and Deliberation in Long-Term Care Policy in Thailand.公民陪审团与老年护理:泰国长期护理政策中的公众参与和审议。
J Aging Soc Policy. 2019 Jul-Sep;31(4):378-392. doi: 10.1080/08959420.2018.1442110. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Are people in residential care entitled to receive rehabilitation services following hip fracture? Views of the public from a citizens' jury.居住在养老院的人在髋部骨折后是否有权接受康复服务?来自公民陪审团的公众意见。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 May 12;20(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01575-y.