De Panfilis Ludovica, Satolli Roberto, Costantini Massimo
Direzione Scientifica, AUSL di Reggio Emilia-IRCCS, Viale Umberto I 50, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
Comitato Etico dell'Area Vasta Emilia Nord, Viale Umberto I 50, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Mar 9;19(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0263-8.
This article proposes a retrospective analysis of a compassionate use (CU), using a case study of request for Avelumab for a patient suffering from Merkel Cell Carcinoma. The study is the result of a discussion within a Provincial Ethics Committee (EC) following the finding of a high number of requests for CU program. The primary objective of the study is to illustrate the specific ethical and clinical profiles that emerge from the compassionate use program (CUP) issue. The secondary goals are: a) to promote a moral reflection among physicians who require approval for the CUP and b) provide the basis for recommendations on how to request CUP.
The instruments for carrying out the analysis of the case study and the discussion are as follows: Analysis of the audio-recording of the EC meeting regarding the selected Case study. In-depth discussion of topics that emerged during the meeting by means of administration of 5 semi-structured interviews with 2 doctors involved in the case (proposing physician and palliative physician) and with 3 components of the EC who played a major role in the EC internal discussion.
In an exploration of emerging clinical and ethical issues, four primary themes arise: 1. efficacy, safety of the treatment and patient's quality of life; 2. clear, realistic, adequate communication; 3. right to hope; 4. simultaneous Palliative Care approach. The results of ethical analysis carried out concern two areas: 1) ethical profiles relating to the use of CUP; 2) the role of the EC concerning the compassionate use of drugs and the need to provide recommendations on how to request CUP. With the aim of implementing these conclusions, the provincial EC of Reggio Emilia chose to steer the request for drugs for compassionate use through recommendations for good clinical and ethical practice based on the following assumptions: 1) the "simultaneous care" approach must be preferred. Secondly, 2) the EC's assessment must be part of the decision-making process that the care team conducts before proposing compassionate use to the patient.
本文通过对一名默克尔细胞癌患者申请阿维鲁单抗的个案研究,对同情用药(CU)进行回顾性分析。该研究是在省级伦理委员会(EC)发现大量同情用药项目申请后进行内部讨论的结果。本研究的主要目的是阐明同情用药项目(CUP)问题中出现的特定伦理和临床特征。次要目标是:a)促进需要CUP批准的医生进行道德反思;b)为如何申请CUP提供建议依据。
进行案例研究分析和讨论的工具如下:分析EC会议关于所选案例研究的录音。通过对参与该案例的2名医生(申请医生和姑息治疗医生)以及在EC内部讨论中发挥主要作用的3名EC成员进行5次半结构化访谈,深入讨论会议中出现的主题。
在探索新出现的临床和伦理问题时,出现了四个主要主题:1. 治疗的有效性、安全性和患者的生活质量;2. 清晰、现实、充分的沟通;3. 希望的权利;4. 同步姑息治疗方法。进行的伦理分析结果涉及两个领域:1)与CUP使用相关的伦理特征;2)EC在药物同情使用方面的作用以及提供如何申请CUP建议的必要性。为了落实这些结论,雷焦艾米利亚省的EC选择通过基于以下假设的良好临床和伦理实践建议来指导同情用药的申请:1)必须优先采用“同步护理”方法。其次,2)EC的评估必须成为护理团队在向患者提出同情用药建议之前进行的决策过程的一部分。