• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对石棉处理的 MeT5A 细胞系进行 DNA 甲基化谱分析揭示了涉及石棉反应的新途径。

DNA methylation profiling of asbestos-treated MeT5A cell line reveals novel pathways implicated in asbestos response.

机构信息

Italian Institute for Genomic Medicine, IIGM, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, 10126, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Arch Toxicol. 2018 May;92(5):1785-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2179-y. Epub 2018 Mar 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00204-018-2179-y
PMID:29523930
Abstract

Occupational and environmental asbestos exposure is the main determinant of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), however, the mechanisms by which its fibres contribute to cell toxicity and transformation are not completely clear. Aberrant DNA methylation is a common event in cancer but epigenetic modifications involved specifically in MPM carcinogenesis need to be better clarified. To investigate asbestos-induced DNA methylation and gene expression changes, we treated Met5A mesothelial cells with different concentrations of crocidolite and chrysotile asbestos (0.5 ÷ 5.0 µg/cm, 72 h incubation). Overall, we observed 243 and 302 differentially methylated CpGs (≥ 10%) between the asbestos dose at 5 µg/cm and untreated control, in chrysotile and crocidolite treatment, respectively. To examine the dose-response effect, Spearman's correlation test was performed and significant CpGs located in genes involved in migration/cell adhesion processes were identified in both treatments. Moreover, we found that both crocidolite and chrysotile exposure induced a significant up-regulation of CA9 and SRGN (log2 fold change > 1.5), previously reported as associated with a more aggressive MPM phenotype. However, we found no correlation between methylation and gene expression changes, except for a moderate significant inverse correlation at the promoter region of DKK1 (Spearman rho = - 1, P value = 0.02) after chrysotile exposure. These results describe for the first time the relationship between DNA methylation modifications and asbestos exposure. Our findings provide a basis to further explore and validate asbestos-induced DNA methylation changes, that could influence MPM carcinogenesis and possibly identifying new chemopreventive target.

摘要

职业和环境石棉暴露是恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的主要决定因素,然而,其纤维导致细胞毒性和转化的机制尚不完全清楚。异常的 DNA 甲基化是癌症中的常见事件,但需要更好地阐明特定于 MPM 癌变的表观遗传修饰。为了研究石棉诱导的 DNA 甲基化和基因表达变化,我们用不同浓度的青石棉和温石棉石棉(0.5-5.0μg/cm,72h 孵育)处理 Met5A 间皮细胞。总体而言,我们在温石棉和青石棉处理中分别观察到 5μg/cm 剂量的石棉和未处理对照之间有 243 和 302 个差异甲基化 CpG(≥10%)。为了检查剂量反应效应,进行了 Spearman 相关检验,并在两种处理中均鉴定出位于参与迁移/细胞黏附过程的基因中的显著 CpG。此外,我们发现青石棉和温石棉暴露均诱导 CA9 和 SRGN(log2 倍数变化>1.5)的显著上调,先前报道与更具侵袭性的 MPM 表型相关。然而,我们发现除了温石棉暴露后 DKK1 启动子区域的中度显著负相关(Spearman rho=-1,P 值=0.02)外,甲基化和基因表达变化之间没有相关性。这些结果首次描述了 DNA 甲基化修饰与石棉暴露之间的关系。我们的研究结果为进一步探索和验证石棉诱导的 DNA 甲基化变化提供了基础,这些变化可能影响 MPM 癌变,并可能确定新的化学预防靶标。

相似文献

1
DNA methylation profiling of asbestos-treated MeT5A cell line reveals novel pathways implicated in asbestos response.对石棉处理的 MeT5A 细胞系进行 DNA 甲基化谱分析揭示了涉及石棉反应的新途径。
Arch Toxicol. 2018 May;92(5):1785-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2179-y. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
2
An updated evaluation of reported no-observed adverse effect levels for chrysotile, amosite, and crocidolite asbestos for lung cancer and mesothelioma.对温石棉、青石棉和铁石棉致肺癌和间皮瘤的已报道无明显不良效应水平的最新评估。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2023 Nov;53(10):611-657. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2023.2283169. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
3
[Expression changes of miRNAs and EMT-related genes in human mesothelial cells induced by long-term exposure to asbestos].长期暴露于石棉诱导的人腹膜间皮细胞中miRNAs及EMT相关基因的表达变化
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Sep 20;42(9):668-672. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240112-00014.
4
Receptor role of the annexin A2 in the mesothelial endocytosis of crocidolite fibers.膜联蛋白A2在青石棉纤维间皮细胞内吞作用中的受体作用。
Lab Invest. 2015 Jul;95(7):749-64. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2015.28. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
5
Frequent homozygous deletion of Cdkn2a/2b in tremolite-induced malignant mesothelioma in rats.在大鼠透闪石诱发的恶性间皮瘤中频繁出现 Cdkn2a/2b 纯合缺失。
Cancer Sci. 2020 Apr;111(4):1180-1192. doi: 10.1111/cas.14358. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
6
Continuous exposure to chrysotile asbestos can cause transformation of human mesothelial cells via HMGB1 and TNF-α signaling.持续接触温石棉可通过HMGB1和TNF-α信号通路导致人间皮细胞发生转化。
Am J Pathol. 2013 Nov;183(5):1654-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2013.07.029.
7
Comparative proliferative and histopathologic changes in rat lungs after inhalation of chrysotile or crocidolite asbestos.吸入温石棉或青石棉后大鼠肺部的增殖和组织病理学变化比较
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1996 Mar;137(1):67-74. doi: 10.1006/taap.1996.0058.
8
Evaluation of the dose-response and fate in the lung and pleura of chrysotile-containing brake dust compared to chrysotile or crocidolite asbestos in a 28-day quantitative inhalation toxicology study.评价含温石棉制动尘在 28 天定量吸入毒理学研究中在肺和胸膜中的剂量反应和归宿,与温石棉或青石棉石棉进行比较。
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018 Jul 15;351:74-92. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.033. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
9
Carcinogenesis and related cell and tissue responses to asbestos: a review.致癌作用以及细胞和组织对石棉的相关反应:综述
Ann Occup Hyg. 1994 Aug;38(4):617-24, 423. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/38.4.617.
10
Low Exposures to Amphibole or Serpentine Asbestos in Germline Bap1-mutant Mice Induce Mesothelioma Characterized by an Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment.胚系 Bap1 突变小鼠低暴露于角闪石或蛇纹石石棉可诱导以免疫抑制性肿瘤微环境为特征的间皮瘤。
Cancer Res Commun. 2024 Apr 8;4(4):1004-1015. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0423.

引用本文的文献

1
Cellular defense mechanisms against asbestos fibers.细胞对石棉纤维的防御机制。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1566473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1566473. eCollection 2025.
2
An anoikis-based gene signature for predicting prognosis in malignant pleural mesothelioma and revealing immune infiltration.一种基于细胞凋亡的基因签名,用于预测恶性胸膜间皮瘤的预后并揭示免疫浸润。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):12089-12102. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05128-9. Epub 2023 Jul 8.
3
Occupation as a risk factor of small cell lung cancer.
职业与小细胞肺癌的风险因素。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 23;13(1):4727. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31991-0.
4
Identification of glycolysis genes signature for predicting prognosis in malignant pleural mesothelioma by bioinformatics and machine learning.生物信息学和机器学习鉴定糖酵解基因特征预测恶性胸膜间皮瘤预后
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Nov 29;13:1056152. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1056152. eCollection 2022.
5
Molecular Fingerprints of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Not Just a Matter of Genetic Alterations.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的分子指纹图谱:不仅仅是基因改变的问题。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 2;10(11):2470. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112470.
6
The Molecular Basis of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.恶性胸膜间皮瘤的分子基础。
Thorac Surg Clin. 2020 Nov;30(4):383-393. doi: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Carbonic anhydrase 9 confers resistance to ferroptosis/apoptosis in malignant mesothelioma under hypoxia.碳酸酐酶 9 在低氧条件下赋予恶性间皮瘤对铁死亡/细胞凋亡的抗性。
Redox Biol. 2019 Sep;26:101297. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2019.101297. Epub 2019 Aug 10.
8
Genomics and Epigenetics of Malignant Mesothelioma.恶性间皮瘤的基因组学与表观遗传学
High Throughput. 2018 Jul 27;7(3):20. doi: 10.3390/ht7030020.