Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Institute of Cardiopulmonary Cerebral Resuscitation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Institute of Cardiopulmonary Cerebral Resuscitation, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China; Cardiovascular Department, Tung Wah Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Dongguan, China.
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Nov;36(11):1980-1985. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.02.034. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
We investigated the effects of a cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) feedback/prompt device on the quality of chest compression (CC) during hands-only CPR following the 2015 AHA guidelines.
A total of 124 laypersons were randomly assigned into three groups. The first (n=42) followed the 2010 guidelines, the second (n=42) followed the 2015 guidelines with no feedback/prompt device, the third (n=40) followed the 2015 guidelines with a feedback/prompt device (2015F). Participants underwent manual CPR training and took a written basic life support examination, then required to perform 2min of hands-only CPR monitored by a CPR feedback/prompt device. The quality of CPR was quantified as the percentage of correct CCs (mean CC depth and rate, complete recoil and chest compression fraction (CCF)) per 20s, as recorded by the CPR feedback/prompt device.
Significantly higher correct ratios of CC, CC depth, and rate were achieved in the 2010 group in each minute vs the 2015 group. The greater mean CC depth and rate were observed in the 2015F group vs the 2015 group. The correct ratio of CC was significantly higher in the 2015F group vs the 2015 group. CCF was also significantly higher in the 2015F group vs the 2015 group in the last 20s of CPR.
It is difficult for a large percentage of laypersons to achieve the targets of CC depth and rate following the 2015 AHA guidelines. CPR feedback/prompt devices significantly improve the quality of hands-only CPR performance by laypersons following the standards of the 2015 AHA guidelines.
我们研究了心肺复苏(CPR)反馈/提示设备对 2015 年 AHA 指南后仅行手部按压(CC)的心肺复苏时 CC 质量的影响。
共 124 名非专业人员被随机分为三组。第一组(n=42)遵循 2010 年指南,第二组(n=42)遵循 2015 年指南但无反馈/提示设备,第三组(n=40)遵循 2015 年指南并使用反馈/提示设备(2015F)。参与者接受手动 CPR 培训并参加书面基本生命支持考试,然后要求在 CPR 反馈/提示设备监测下进行 2 分钟仅行手部按压的 CPR。CPR 反馈/提示设备记录 CPR 质量,每 20s 计算正确 CC 比例(平均 CC 深度和频率、完全回弹和 CC 分数(CCF))。
在每分钟内,2010 组的 CC、CC 深度和频率的正确比例明显高于 2015 组。2015F 组的平均 CC 深度和频率大于 2015 组。与 2015 组相比,2015F 组的 CC 正确比例明显更高。在 CPR 的最后 20s,2015F 组的 CCF 也明显高于 2015 组。
对于大部分非专业人员来说,很难达到 2015 年 AHA 指南中 CC 深度和频率的目标。CPR 反馈/提示设备可显著提高非专业人员根据 2015 年 AHA 指南标准进行仅行手部按压的 CPR 质量。