Leiden Consortium on Individual Development, Leiden University, AK Leiden, 2333, The Netherlands.
Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, AK Leiden, 2333, The Netherlands.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Jul;39(7):2828-2841. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24043. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Middle childhood marks an important phase for developing and maintaining social relations. At the same time, this phase is marked by a gap in our knowledge of the genetic and environmental influences on brain responses to social feedback and their relation to behavioral aggression. In a large developmental twin sample (509 7- to 9-year-olds), the heritability and neural underpinnings of behavioral aggression following social evaluation were investigated, using the Social Network Aggression Task (SNAT). Participants viewed pictures of peers that gave positive, neutral, or negative feedback to the participant's profile. Next, participants could blast a loud noise toward the peer as an index of aggression. Genetic modeling revealed that aggression following negative feedback was influenced by both genetics and environmental (shared as well as unique environment). On a neural level (n = 385), the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex gyrus (ACCg) responded to both positive and negative feedback, suggesting they signal for social salience cues. The medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) were specifically activated during negative feedback, whereas positive feedback resulted in increased activation in caudate, supplementary motor cortex (SMA), and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Decreased SMA and DLPFC activation during negative feedback was associated with more aggressive behavior after negative feedback. Moreover, genetic modeling showed that 13%-14% of the variance in dorsolateral PFC activity was explained by genetics. Our results suggest that the processing of social feedback is partly explained by genetic factors, whereas shared environmental influences play a role in behavioral aggression following feedback.
儿童中期是发展和维持社会关系的重要阶段。与此同时,我们对遗传和环境因素如何影响大脑对社会反馈的反应以及这些反应与行为攻击的关系知之甚少。在一个大型的发展性双胞胎样本(509 名 7 至 9 岁的儿童)中,使用社会网络攻击任务(SNAT)研究了社会评价后行为攻击的遗传性和神经基础。参与者观看了同伴的照片,这些照片对参与者的个人资料给予了积极、中性或消极的反馈。接下来,参与者可以向同伴发出响亮的噪音作为攻击的指标。遗传建模显示,负面反馈后的攻击受到遗传和环境(共享和独特环境)的影响。在神经水平上(n=385),前岛叶和前扣带皮层回(ACCg)对积极和消极反馈都有反应,这表明它们对社会显著性线索发出信号。内侧前额叶皮层(mPFC)和下额前回(IFG)在接受负反馈时特别活跃,而正反馈则导致尾状核、辅助运动皮层(SMA)和背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)的激活增加。负反馈期间 SMA 和 DLPFC 激活减少与负反馈后更具攻击性的行为有关。此外,遗传建模显示,DLPFC 活动的 13%-14%的变异可以用遗传因素来解释。我们的研究结果表明,社会反馈的处理部分由遗传因素解释,而反馈后行为攻击则受到共享环境因素的影响。