School of Rehabilitation.
Department of Psychology.
Clin J Pain. 2018 Sep;34(9):804-810. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000604.
To investigate the association between fear-avoidance variables, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function, pain intensity in women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD), as well as the moderator effect of partner support.
A sample of 173 women diagnosed with PVD participated in the study. Fear-avoidance variables were assessed with validated self-administered questionnaires: pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), pain-related fear (Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale), and partner support (Partner Support Questionnaire). Pain intensity was evaluated using a numerical rating scale. PFM function, including maximal strength, speed of contraction, flexibility, and muscle tone, was evaluated with a dynamometric speculum.
Pain catastrophizing was significantly associated with pain intensity (β=0.310, P<0.001), partner support (β=0.194, P=0.004), and PFM flexibility (β=-0.255, P<0.001). Fear-avoidance, PFM variables, and partner support explained 28.3% of the variance in pain during intercourse (P<0.001). The addition of PFM was of particular interest as it explained a significant addition of 9% of the variance in pain intensity. Partner support was found to moderate the association between pain intensity and catastrophizing. Among women with high partner support, catastrophizing was not significantly related to pain (b=0.150, P=0.142). When partner support was low, catastrophizing was significantly related to pain (b=0.068, P<0.001).
Findings of this study support that the symptomatology of PVD can be explained partly by fear-avoidance variables and PFM function. This study supports the significant role of PFM function and its importance in the pathophysiology of PVD. It also sheds light on the role of partner support and its moderating effect on pain catastrophizing.
探讨恐惧回避变量与女性盆底肌(pelvic floor muscle,PFM)功能、阴道前庭疼痛程度( provoked vestibulodynia,PVD)之间的关系,以及伴侣支持的调节作用。
本研究纳入了 173 名确诊为 PVD 的女性。使用经过验证的自我管理问卷评估恐惧回避变量:疼痛灾难化(Pain Catastrophizing Scale)、疼痛相关恐惧(Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale)和伴侣支持(Partner Support Questionnaire)。使用数字评分量表评估疼痛强度。使用动态测径器评估 PFM 功能,包括最大力量、收缩速度、柔韧性和肌肉张力。
疼痛灾难化与疼痛强度(β=0.310,P<0.001)、伴侣支持(β=0.194,P=0.004)和 PFM 柔韧性(β=-0.255,P<0.001)显著相关。恐惧回避、PFM 变量和伴侣支持共同解释了性交时疼痛的 28.3%(P<0.001)。PFM 的加入特别有意义,因为它解释了疼痛强度方差的显著增加 9%。伴侣支持被发现调节了疼痛强度和灾难化之间的关系。在伴侣支持高的女性中,灾难化与疼痛无显著相关性(b=0.150,P=0.142)。当伴侣支持较低时,灾难化与疼痛显著相关(b=0.068,P<0.001)。
本研究结果支持 PVD 的症状部分可以用恐惧回避变量和 PFM 功能来解释。本研究支持 PFM 功能在 PVD 病理生理学中的重要作用及其重要性。它还揭示了伴侣支持的作用及其对疼痛灾难化的调节作用。