Shinall Myrick C, Ely E Wesley, Karlekar Mohana, Robbins Samuel G, Chandrasekhar Rameela, Martin Sara F
1 Section of Palliative Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
2 Division of Allergy, Pulmonology and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Oct;35(10):1292-1294. doi: 10.1177/1049909118763793. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Palliative (FACIT-Pal) 14 instrument measures the quality of life in palliative care patients but its psychometric properties are not well characterized.
To establish the reliability and validity of the FACIT-Pal 14 in an outpatient palliative care clinic population.
The FACIT-Pal 14 was administered to 227 patients in an outpatient palliative care clinic at a large, urban academic medical center. Internal consistency reliability was assessed with Crohnbach's α, and principal component analysis was used to investigate for multiple underlying latent variables. Construct validity was tested by comparing mean scores in various subgroups.
The FACIT-Pal 14 has Crohnbach's α of 0.76, which increases to 0.79 if 2 items are removed. Principal component analysis supports a single latent variable underlying the instrument. Significantly lower mean scores were found in patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) functional status 3 to 4 compared with patients with ECOG functional status 1-2 ( P = .007), in patients with life expectancy under 6 months compared to those with 6 months or greater ( P = .003), and in patients referred to clinic for pain and symptom management compared with patients referred for other reasons ( P = .038). Instrument scores did not significantly differ between men and women or between white and nonwhite patients ( P = .525 and P = .263, respectively).
In an outpatient palliative care clinic population, the FACIT-Pal 14 has good internal consistency, but removal of 2 items would improve consistency. One latent variable underlies the instrument and there is evidence of construct validity.
慢性病治疗-姑息治疗功能评估(FACIT-Pal)14量表用于测量姑息治疗患者的生活质量,但其心理测量特性尚未得到充分表征。
在门诊姑息治疗诊所人群中确立FACIT-Pal 14量表的信度和效度。
在一家大型城市学术医疗中心的门诊姑息治疗诊所,对227例患者使用FACIT-Pal 14量表进行评估。采用Cronbach's α评估内部一致性信度,并使用主成分分析来探究多个潜在的潜在变量。通过比较不同亚组的平均得分来检验结构效度。
FACIT-Pal 14量表的Cronbach's α为0.76,如果去掉2个条目,该值将增至0.79。主成分分析支持该量表存在一个潜在变量。与东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)功能状态为1-2的患者相比,ECOG功能状态为3-4的患者平均得分显著更低(P = .007);与预期寿命6个月或更长的患者相比,预期寿命不足6个月的患者平均得分显著更低(P = .003);与因其他原因转诊至诊所的患者相比,因疼痛和症状管理转诊至诊所的患者平均得分显著更低(P = .038)。男性与女性之间、白人患者与非白人患者之间的量表得分无显著差异(分别为P = .525和P = .263)。
在门诊姑息治疗诊所人群中,FACIT-Pal 14量表具有良好的内部一致性,但去掉2个条目可提高一致性。该量表存在一个潜在变量,并有结构效度的证据。