School of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Departments of Population Health Sciences, and Medicine, Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University; Durham VA Adapt Center of Innovation, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;24(12):1798-1806. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0044. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
Religion and spirituality (R/S) impact how African Americans (AAs) cope with serious illness, yet are infrequently addressed in patient-clinician communication. To explore AAs with advanced heart failure and their family caregivers' (FCGs) preferences about R/S in patient-clinician communication. An embedded qualitative interview within a parent randomized trial about the role of R/S in the illness experience and in clinician interactions with patients and FCGs in a Southern U.S. state. Transcribed interviews were analyzed using constant comparative analysis to identify emergent themes. AA participants ( = 15) were a mean age of 62 years, were female (40%), and had >high school diploma/GED (87%). AA FCGs ( = 14) were a mean age of 58; were female (93%); had >high school diploma/General Education Development (GED) (93%); and were unemployed (86%). Most (63%) were patients' spouses/partners. All patients and FCGs were Protestant. Participants reported the critical role of R/S in living with illness; however, patients' and FCGs' perspectives related to inclusion of R/S in health care communications differed. Patients' perspectives were as follows: (1) R/S is not discussed in clinical encounters and (2) R/S should be discussed only if patient initiated. FCGs' perspectives about ideal inclusion of R/S represented three main diverging themes: (1) clinicians' R/S communication is not a priority, (2) clinicians should openly acknowledge patients' R/S beliefs, and (3) clinicians should engage in R/S conversations with patients. Key thematic differences about the role of R/S in illness and preferences for incorporating R/S in health care communications reveal important considerations about the need to assess and individualize this aspect of palliative care research and practice.
宗教和精神信仰(R/S)影响非裔美国人(AAs)应对严重疾病的方式,但在医患沟通中却很少提及。本研究旨在探讨患有晚期心力衰竭的 AAs 及其家属照顾者(FCGs)对医患沟通中 R/S 的偏好。这是一项在美国南部进行的父母随机试验的嵌入式定性访谈,旨在探讨 R/S 在疾病体验以及在临床医生与患者和 FCG 互动中的作用。转录后的访谈采用恒定比较分析进行分析,以确定出现的主题。AA 参与者(n=15)的平均年龄为 62 岁,女性占 40%,高中以上学历/GED 占 87%。AA FCGs(n=14)的平均年龄为 58 岁;女性占 93%;高中以上学历/GED 占 93%;失业占 86%。大多数(63%)是患者的配偶/伴侣。所有患者和 FCGs 都是新教徒。参与者报告 R/S 在与疾病共存中的关键作用;然而,患者和 FCGs 对将 R/S 纳入医疗保健沟通的看法存在差异。患者的观点如下:(1)R/S 在临床接触中没有讨论;(2)只有在患者发起的情况下才讨论 R/S。FCGs 对理想的 R/S 纳入的看法代表了三个主要的分歧主题:(1)临床医生的 R/S 沟通不是优先事项;(2)临床医生应该公开承认患者的 R/S 信仰;(3)临床医生应该与患者进行 R/S 对话。关于 R/S 在疾病中的作用以及将 R/S 纳入医疗保健沟通的偏好的关键主题差异,揭示了在姑息治疗研究和实践中评估和个性化这一方面的重要考虑因素。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024-8
Palliat Support Care. 2018-6-5
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021-6
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024-7
Clin Interv Aging. 2025-3-20
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024-12-11
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2020-3
J Diabetes Complications. 2018-11-22