Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Education and Health Sciences, University of Limerick, Castletroy, Limerick, Ireland.
Ageing Research Centre, Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Oct 11;23(1):1090. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10027-3.
Validated screening tools can be utilised to detect early disease processes and risk factors for disease and adverse outcomes. Consequently, identifying individuals in need of early intervention and targeted assessment can be achieved through the implementation of screening in the ED. Successful implementation can be impacted by a lack of resources and ineffective integration of screening into the clinical workflow. Tailored implementation processes and staff training, which are contextually specific to the ED setting, are facilitators to effective implementation. This review will assist in the identification of barriers and facilitators to screening in the ED using a QES to underpin implementation processes. Healthcare workers engage in screening in the ED routinely. Consequently, this review focused on synthesizing the experience of healthcare workers (HCWs) who are involved in this process. This synthesis is informed by a QES protocol published by the lead author in 2021 (Barry et al., HRB Open Res 3:50, 2021).
A comprehensive literature search, inclusive of grey literature sources, was undertaken. Initially, an a priori framework of themes was formed to facilitate the interpretation and organisation of search results. A context specific conceptual model was then formulated using "Best fit" framework synthesis which further assisted in the interpretation of data that was extracted from relevant studies. Dual blind screening of search results was undertaken using RAYYAN as a platform. Thirty studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. Dual appraisal of full text articles was undertaken using CASP, GRADE CERQual assessed confidence of findings and data extraction was performed by two reviewers collaboratively.
This is the first known synthesis of qualitative research on HCW's experiences of screening in the ED. Predominantly, the findings illustrate that staff experience screening in the ED as a complex challenging process. The barriers and facilitators identified can be broadly categorised under preconditions to screen, motivations to screen and knowledge and skills to screen. Competing interests in the ED, environmental stressors such as overcrowding and an organisational culture that resists screening were clear barriers. Adequate resources and tailored education to underpin the screening process were clear facilitators.
PROSPERO: CRD42020188712 05/07/20.
有效的筛选工具可用于检测疾病的早期过程和风险因素,以及疾病和不良结局。因此,通过在急诊科实施筛选,可以确定需要早期干预和针对性评估的个体。资源的缺乏和筛选未能有效地融入临床工作流程会对成功实施产生影响。针对急诊科环境的具体情况制定的实施流程和员工培训是有效实施的促进因素。本综述将使用 QES 来确定急诊科筛查的障碍和促进因素,以支持实施流程。医疗保健工作者在急诊科常规进行筛查。因此,本综述侧重于综合参与这一过程的医疗保健工作者(HCWs)的经验。这一综合是基于主要作者在 2021 年发表的 QES 协议(Barry 等人,HRB Open Res 3:50, 2021)。
进行了全面的文献检索,包括灰色文献来源。最初,形成了一个预先确定的主题框架,以促进对搜索结果的解释和组织。然后使用“最佳拟合”框架综合方法制定了一个特定于上下文的概念模型,这进一步有助于解释从相关研究中提取的数据。使用 RAYYAN 作为平台进行了搜索结果的双重盲筛选。确定了 30 项符合纳入标准的研究。使用 CASP 对全文文章进行双重评估,使用 GRADE CERQual 评估发现的置信度,由两名审查员共同进行数据提取。
这是对急诊科 HCW 筛查经验的定性研究的首次综合。研究结果主要表明,工作人员将在急诊科进行筛查视为一项复杂而具有挑战性的工作。确定的障碍和促进因素可大致分为筛查的前提条件、筛查的动机以及筛查的知识和技能。急诊科的利益冲突、过度拥挤等环境压力因素以及抵制筛查的组织文化是明显的障碍。充足的资源和支持筛查过程的针对性教育是明显的促进因素。
PROSPERO:CRD42020188712 05/07/20。