Unit of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 1;260:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.03.029. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
To evaluate the relationship between right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction at rest and reduced exercise capacity in patients with a systemic RV (sRV).
All patients with congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) or complete TGA after atrial switch (TGA-Mustard/Senning) followed in our institution between July 2011 and September 2017 who underwent cardiac imaging within a six-month time period of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were analyzed. We assessed sRV systolic function with TAPSE and fractional area change on echocardiogram and, if possible, with ejection fraction, global longitudinal and circumferential strain on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.
We studied 105 patients with an sRV (median age 34 [IQR 28-42] years, 29% ccTGA and 71% TGA-Mustard/Senning) of which 39% had either a pacemaker (n = 17), Eisenmenger physiology (n = 6), severe systemic atrioventricular valve regurgitation (n = 14), or peak exercise arterial oxygen saturation < 92% (n = 17). Most patients were asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic (NYHA class I/II/III in 71/23/6%). Sixty-four percent had evidence of moderate or severe sRV dysfunction on cardiac imaging. Mean peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) was 24.1 ± 7.4 mL/kg/min, corresponding to a percentage of predicted pVO2 (%ppVO2) of 69 ± 17%. No parameter of sRV systolic function as evaluated on echocardiography (n = 105) or CMR (n = 46) was correlated with the %ppVO2, even after adjusting for associated cardiac defects or pacemakers.
In adults with an sRV, there is no relation between echocardiographic or CMR-derived sRV systolic function parameters at rest and peak oxygen uptake. Exercise imaging may be superior to evaluate whether sRV contractility limits exercise capacity.
评估右心室(RV)收缩功能与系统性 RV(sRV)患者运动能力降低之间的关系。
分析 2011 年 7 月至 2017 年 9 月期间在我院接受心脏影像学检查且在心肺运动测试(CPET)的 6 个月内进行过超声心动图检查的所有患有先天性矫正型大动脉转位(ccTGA)或心房转换后完全性大动脉转位(TGA-Mustard/Senning)的患者。我们使用 TAPSE 和超声心动图的分数面积变化评估 sRV 收缩功能,如果可能,还使用心脏磁共振成像(CMR)的射血分数、整体纵向应变和环向应变评估 sRV 收缩功能。
研究了 105 例 sRV 患者(中位数年龄 34[IQR 28-42]岁,29%为 ccTGA,71%为 TGA-Mustard/Senning),其中 39%的患者有起搏器(n=17)、艾森曼格生理(n=6)、严重系统性房室瓣反流(n=14)或峰值运动时动脉血氧饱和度<92%(n=17)。大多数患者无症状或轻度症状(NYHA 心功能分级 I/II/III 级分别为 71/23/6%)。64%的患者心脏影像学检查显示 sRV 功能中度或重度障碍。平均峰值摄氧量(pVO2)为 24.1±7.4 mL/kg/min,相应的预测 pVO2(%ppVO2)为 69±17%。超声心动图(n=105)或 CMR(n=46)评估的 sRV 收缩功能的任何参数均与%ppVO2 无关,即使在调整相关心脏缺陷或起搏器后也是如此。
在患有 sRV 的成年人中,静息时超声心动图或 CMR 衍生的 sRV 收缩功能参数与峰值摄氧量之间没有关系。运动成像可能优于评估 sRV 收缩力是否限制运动能力。