Zandstra Tjitske E, Jongbloed Monique R M, Widya Ralph L, Ten Harkel Arend D J, Holman Eduard R, Mertens Bart J A, Vliegen Hubert W, Egorova Anastasia D, Schalij Martin J, Kiès Philippine
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Mar 16;8:644193. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.644193. eCollection 2021.
Inherent to its geometry, echocardiographic imaging of the systemic right ventricle (RV) is challenging. Therefore, echocardiographic assessment of systemic RV function may not always be feasible and/or reproducible in daily practice. Here, we aim to validate the usefulness of a comprehensive range of 32 echocardiographic measurements of systemic RV function in a longitudinal cohort by serial assessment of their correlations with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived systemic RV ejection fraction (RVEF). A single-center, retrospective cohort study was performed. Adult patients with a systemic RV who underwent a combination of both CMR and echocardiography at two different points in time were included. Off-line analysis of echocardiographic images was blinded to off-line CMR analysis and vice versa. In half of the echocardiograms, measurements were repeated by a second observer blinded to the results of the first. Correlations between echocardiographic and CMR measures were assessed with Pearson's correlation coefficient and interobserver agreement was quantified with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Fourteen patients were included, of which 4 had congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries (ccTGA) and 10 patients had TGA late after an atrial switch operation. Eight patients (57%) were female. There was a mean of 8 years between the first and second imaging assessment. Only global systemic RV function, fractional area change (FAC), and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were consistently, i.e., at both time points, correlated with CMR-RVEF (global RV function: = -0.77/ = -0.63; FAC: = 0.79/ = 0.67; GLS: = -0.73/ = -0.70, all -values < 0.05). The ICC of GLS (0.82 at = 1, = 0.006, 0.77 at = 2, = 0.024) was higher than the ICC of FAC (0.35 at = 1, = 0.196, 0.70 at = 2, = 0.051) at both time points. GLS appears to be the most robust echocardiographic measurement of systemic RV function with good correlation with CMR-RVEF and reproducibility.
由于其几何结构的固有特性,对体循环右心室(RV)进行超声心动图成像具有挑战性。因此,在日常实践中,对体循环右心室功能进行超声心动图评估可能并不总是可行和/或可重复的。在此,我们旨在通过对一系列32项体循环右心室功能的超声心动图测量值与心脏磁共振(CMR)得出的体循环右心室射血分数(RVEF)之间的相关性进行系列评估,来验证这些测量值在纵向队列中的有用性。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入了在两个不同时间点同时接受CMR和超声心动图检查的患有体循环右心室的成年患者。超声心动图图像的离线分析对CMR离线分析是盲法的,反之亦然。在一半的超声心动图中,由对第一位观察者的结果不知情的第二位观察者重复测量。用Pearson相关系数评估超声心动图测量值与CMR测量值之间的相关性,并用组内相关系数(ICC)对观察者间的一致性进行量化。共纳入14例患者,其中4例患有先天性矫正型大动脉转位(ccTGA),10例患者在心房调转手术后晚期患有大动脉转位(TGA)。8例患者(57%)为女性。第一次和第二次成像评估之间平均间隔8年。只有整体体循环右心室功能、面积变化分数(FAC)和整体纵向应变(GLS)在两个时间点均始终与CMR-RVEF相关(整体右心室功能:r = -0.77/r = -0.63;FAC:r = 0.79/r = 0.67;GLS:r = -0.73/r = -0.70,所有P值<0.05)。在两个时间点,GLS的ICC(在k = 1时为0.82,P = 0.006,在k = 2时为0.77,P = 0.024)均高于FAC的ICC(在k = 1时为0.35,P = 0.196,在k = 2时为0.70,P = 0.051)。GLS似乎是对体循环右心室功能最可靠的超声心动图测量指标,与CMR-RVEF具有良好的相关性和可重复性。