Duke University School of Medicine, 8 Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 May;33(5):715-721. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4392-z. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Ideally, a referral from a primary care physician (PCP) to a specialist results in a completed specialty appointment with results available to the PCP. This is defined as "closing the referral loop." As health systems grow more complex, regulatory bodies increase vigilance, and reimbursement shifts towards value, closing the referral loop becomes a patient safety, regulatory, and financial imperative.
OBJECTIVE/DESIGN: To assess the ability of a large health system to close the referral loop, we used electronic medical record (EMR)-generated data to analyze referrals from a large primary care network to 20 high-volume specialties between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016.
The primary metric was documented specialist appointment completion rate. Explanatory analyses included documented appointment scheduling rate, individual clinic differences, appointment wait times, and geographic distance to appointments.
Of the 103,737 analyzed referral scheduling attempts, only 36,072 (34.8%) resulted in documented complete appointments. Low documented appointment scheduling rates (38.9% of scheduling attempts lacked appointment dates), individual clinic differences in closing the referral loop, and significant differences in wait times and distances to specialists between complete and incomplete appointments drove this gap. Other notable findings include high variation in wait times among specialties and correlation between high wait times and low documented appointment completion rates.
The rate of closing the referral loop in this health system is low. Low appointment scheduling rates, individual clinic differences, and patient access issues of wait times and geographic proximity explain much of the gap. This problem is likely common among large health systems with complex provider networks and referral scheduling. Strategies that improve scheduling, decrease variation among clinics, and improve patient access will likely improve rates of closing the referral loop. More research is necessary to determine the impact of these changes and other potential driving factors.
理想情况下,初级保健医生(PCP)将患者转诊给专科医生后,专科医生应完成专科预约,并将结果反馈给 PCP。这被定义为“关闭转诊循环”。随着医疗体系变得更加复杂,监管机构加强警惕,以及报销向价值型转变,“关闭转诊循环”成为患者安全、监管和财务的当务之急。
目的/设计:为了评估大型医疗系统关闭转诊循环的能力,我们使用电子病历(EMR)生成的数据,分析了 2015 年 7 月 1 日至 2016 年 6 月 30 日期间,来自大型初级保健网络的 103737 例转诊至 20 个高流量专科的情况。
主要指标是记录的专科预约完成率。解释性分析包括记录的预约安排率、个别诊所差异、预约等待时间和预约地点的地理距离。
在分析的 103737 例转诊预约尝试中,仅有 36072 例(34.8%)记录了完整的预约。记录的预约安排率低(38.9%的预约安排尝试缺乏预约日期)、个别诊所关闭转诊循环的差异,以及完整和不完整预约之间的显著等待时间和距离差异导致了这一差距。其他值得注意的发现包括专科之间等待时间的高度差异以及高等待时间与低记录预约完成率之间的相关性。
该医疗系统关闭转诊循环的比例较低。低预约安排率、个别诊所差异以及患者等待时间和地理位置的访问问题解释了大部分差距。这个问题可能在具有复杂医疗服务网络和转诊预约的大型医疗系统中很常见。提高预约安排率、减少诊所间差异以及改善患者访问的策略可能会提高关闭转诊循环的比例。需要进一步研究以确定这些变化和其他潜在驱动因素的影响。