Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下胆道引流术(EUS-BD)治疗合并腹水的恶性胆道梗阻的可行性和安全性:一项初步研究的结果。

Feasibility and Safety of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage (EUS-BD) for Malignant Biliary Obstruction Associated with Ascites: Results of a Pilot Study.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.

Department of Gastroenterology, Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jul;22(7):1213-1220. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3731-z. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It has been suggested that EUS-BD may be a feasible and safer alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) after failed ERCP in patients with ascites. To date, no study has specifically evaluated the performance of EUS-BD in this context.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was done for patients with and without ascites who underwent EUS-BD for malignant biliary obstruction after failed ERCP between July 2010 and September 2014. Complications and technical and clinical successes between the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were included: 20 patients without ascites (group 1) and 11 with ascites (group 2). Nineteen patients underwent EUS-hepaticogastrostomy (six in group 2), and 12 underwent EUS-choledochoduodenostomy (five in group 2). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Clinical success was observed in 95% (n = 19) in group 1 and 64% (n = 7) in group 2 (p = 0.042). In three out of four patients without clinical success in group 2, the follow-up period was not long enough to observe the clinical response because of early death within the 2 weeks after EUS-BD secondary to disease progression or preprocedural unresponsive sepsis. No significant differences were observed between groups 1 and 2 either in the overall rates of procedural-related complications (20 and 9%, respectively, p = 0.63) or in the rates of major complications (15 vs 9%, respectively, p = 0.639). Stent migration occurred in one patient in each group, intra- or post-procedural bleeding occurred in two patients in group 1, which was conservatively managed, and one patient in group 1 presented biliary leakage. Stent patency and the number of re-interventions were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-BD is technically feasible in patients with ascites. Our results suggest that EUS-BD may be a clinically effective and safe alternative after failed ERCP in patients with ascites.

摘要

背景

有研究表明,对于内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)失败后合并腹水的患者,超声内镜下胆汁引流术(EUS-BD)可能是一种可行且更安全的经皮经肝胆道引流术(PTBD)替代方法。迄今为止,尚无研究专门评估 EUS-BD 在这种情况下的表现。

方法

对 2010 年 7 月至 2014 年 9 月期间因 ERCP 失败后恶性胆道梗阻而行 EUS-BD 的合并腹水和不合并腹水的患者进行回顾性分析。比较两组患者的并发症、技术和临床成功率。

结果

共纳入 31 例患者:20 例不合并腹水患者(组 1)和 11 例合并腹水患者(组 2)。19 例行 EUS 肝胃吻合术(组 2 中 6 例),12 例行 EUS 胆总管十二指肠吻合术(组 2 中 5 例)。所有患者均获得技术成功。组 1 的临床成功率为 95%(n=19),组 2 的临床成功率为 64%(n=7)(p=0.042)。在组 2 中,4 例临床治疗失败的患者中,有 3 例由于疾病进展或术前无反应性败血症导致 EUS-BD 后 2 周内死亡,随访时间不足以观察临床反应。组 1 和组 2 之间在手术相关并发症的总发生率(分别为 20%和 9%,p=0.63)或主要并发症的发生率(分别为 15%和 9%,p=0.639)方面均无显著差异。1 例患者在每个组中出现支架迁移,2 例患者在组 1 中出现术中或术后出血,均采用保守治疗,1 例患者在组 1 中出现胆漏。支架通畅率和再干预次数无显著差异。

结论

EUS-BD 在合并腹水的患者中技术上是可行的。我们的研究结果表明,EUS-BD 可能是合并腹水的 ERCP 失败患者的一种有效且安全的临床替代方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验