Suppr超能文献

内镜超声引导下对具有手术改变解剖结构的恶性胆道梗阻进行胆道引流:一项多中心前瞻性注册研究。

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction with surgically altered anatomy: a multicenter prospective registration study.

作者信息

Minaga Kosuke, Takenaka Mamoru, Ogura Takeshi, Tamura Takashi, Kuroda Taira, Kaku Toyoma, Uenoyama Yoshito, Noguchi Chishio, Nishikiori Hidefumi, Imai Hajime, Sagami Ryota, Fujimori Nao, Higuchi Kazuhide, Kudo Masatoshi, Chiba Yasutaka, Kitano Masayuki

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan.

Second Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan.

出版信息

Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2020 Jul 29;13:1756284820930964. doi: 10.1177/1756284820930964. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) in patients bearing surgically altered anatomy (SAA) is not well-established. Although endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has emerged as a new treatment option for MBO, limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in patients with SAA. We conducted a multicenter prospective registration study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD in this population.

METHODS

This study involved 10 referral centers in Japan. Patients with SAA who were scheduled to receive EUS-BD for unresectable MBO between May 2016 and September 2018 were prospectively registered. The primary endpoint was technical success and the secondary outcomes were clinical success, procedure time, procedure-related adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and overall survival.

RESULTS

In total, 40 patients were prospectively enrolled. The surgical reconstruction methods were gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (47.5%), gastrectomy with Billroth-II reconstruction (15%), pancreaticoduodenectomy (27.5%), and hepaticojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction (10%). EUS-BD was performed for primary biliary drainage in 31 patients and for rescue biliary drainage in nine patients. Transmural stenting alone (60%), antegrade stenting alone (5%), and a combination of the two techniques (35%) were selected for patients treated with EUS-BD. Technical and clinical success rates were 100% (95% confidence interval, 91.2-100.0%) and 95% (95% confidence interval, 83.1-99.4%), respectively. Mean procedure time was 36.5 min. Early AEs were noted in six patients (15%): three self-limited bile leak, one bile peritonitis, and two pneumoperitonea. Late AEs occurred in six patients (15%): one jejunal ulcer and five stent occlusions. Stent patency rate after 3 months of survival was 95.7% (22/23). Median overall survival was 96 days.

CONCLUSION

EUS-BD for MBO in patients with SAA appears to be effective and safe not only as a rescue drainage technique after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiography but also as a primary drainage technique.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000022101.

摘要

背景

对于解剖结构已手术改变(SAA)的患者,恶性胆管梗阻(MBO)的内镜治疗方法尚未完全确立。尽管内镜超声引导下胆管引流(EUS-BD)已成为MBO的一种新治疗选择,但关于SAA患者中EUS-BD的疗效和安全性的数据有限。我们开展了一项多中心前瞻性注册研究,以评估EUS-BD在该人群中的疗效和安全性。

方法

本研究涉及日本的10个转诊中心。对2016年5月至2018年9月期间计划接受EUS-BD治疗不可切除MBO的SAA患者进行前瞻性注册。主要终点是技术成功,次要结局包括临床成功、手术时间、手术相关不良事件(AE)、支架通畅率和总生存期。

结果

总共前瞻性纳入40例患者。手术重建方法包括胃切除加Roux-en-Y重建(47.5%)、胃切除加毕罗Ⅱ式重建(15%)、胰十二指肠切除术(27.5%)和肝空肠吻合加Roux-en-Y重建(10%)。31例患者行EUS-BD用于原发性胆管引流,9例患者行EUS-BD用于补救性胆管引流。接受EUS-BD治疗的患者中,单独采用透壁支架置入术(60%)、单独采用顺行支架置入术(5%)以及两种技术联合应用(35%)。技术成功率和临床成功率分别为100%(95%置信区间,91.2-100.0%)和95%(95%置信区间,83.1-99.4%)。平均手术时间为36.5分钟。6例患者(15%)出现早期AE:3例为自限性胆漏,1例为胆汁性腹膜炎,2例为气腹。6例患者(15%)出现晚期AE:1例为空肠溃疡,5例为支架堵塞。生存3个月后的支架通畅率为95.7%(22/23)。中位总生存期为96天。

结论

对于SAA患者的MBO,EUS-BD不仅作为内镜逆行胆管造影失败后的补救性引流技术,而且作为原发性引流技术,似乎都是有效且安全的。

临床试验注册

UMIN000022101。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac97/7391429/de1e87ca978e/10.1177_1756284820930964-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验