• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HTX-019(阿瑞匹坦静脉注射剂)与磷丙泊酚二钠在健康受试者中的生物等效性:一项I期、开放标签、随机、双向交叉评估。

Bioequivalence of HTX-019 (aprepitant IV) and fosaprepitant in healthy subjects: a Phase I, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover evaluation.

作者信息

Ottoboni Tom, Keller Mary Rose, Cravets Matt, Clendeninn Neil, Quart Barry

机构信息

Pharmaceutical and Translational Sciences, Heron Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

Clinical Operations, Heron Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Mar 1;12:429-435. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S155875. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S155875
PMID:29535504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5837372/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Fosaprepitant, an intravenous (IV) aprepitant prodrug for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, is associated with systemic and infusion-site reactions attributed in part to its surfactant, polysorbate 80. HTX-019 is an IV aprepitant formulation free of polysorbate 80 and other synthetic surfactants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This open-label, single-dose, randomized, two-way crossover bioequivalence study compared pharmacokinetics and safety of HTX-019 and fosaprepitant. Healthy subjects received single-dose HTX-019 (130 mg) or fosaprepitant (150 mg) IV over 30 min, with ≥7-day washout between doses. Blood samples were evaluated for pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence; safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events. Ninety-seven of one hundred enrolled subjects completed the study.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were comparable between treatment sequences. For HTX-019, mean (percent coefficient of variation) area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to time of last measurable plasma concentration (AUC), AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC), and plasma concentration at 12 h (C) for HTX-019 were 43,729 hng/mL (32.7), 45,460 hng/mL (36.8), and 988.4 ng/mL (27.5), respectively; corresponding fosaprepitant values were 44,130 hng/mL (32.0), 46,163 hng/mL (36.6), and 1,022 ng/mL (28.5). Also, 90% CIs (94.186-101.354) were within bioequivalence bounds (80%-125%). Within 1 h following infusion start, one (1%) HTX-019 recipient reported one TEAE, while 20 (20%) fosaprepitant recipients reported 32 TEAEs. Dyspnea occurred in three fosaprepitant recipients (at <1 min in two subjects and at 18 min in one subject, considered study drug related) and one HTX-019 recipient (at 120 h, associated with a respiratory tract infection and considered not related to the study drug). No severe TEAEs, serious adverse events, or deaths occurred; all TEAEs resolved.

CONCLUSION

HTX-019 was bioequivalent to fosaprepitant and may provide a safer alternative to fosaprepitant for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.

摘要

引言

福沙匹坦是一种用于预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的静脉注射(IV)阿瑞匹坦前体药物,其全身和输注部位反应部分归因于其表面活性剂聚山梨酯80。HTX-019是一种不含聚山梨酯80和其他合成表面活性剂的静脉注射阿瑞匹坦制剂。

材料和方法

这项开放标签、单剂量、随机、双向交叉生物等效性研究比较了HTX-019和福沙匹坦的药代动力学和安全性。健康受试者在30分钟内静脉注射单剂量HTX-019(130毫克)或福沙匹坦(150毫克),两次给药之间的洗脱期≥7天。对血样进行药代动力学和生物等效性评估;安全性评估包括治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)和严重不良事件。100名入组受试者中有97名完成了研究。

结果

各治疗序列之间的基线特征具有可比性。对于HTX-019,从时间0到最后可测量血浆浓度的曲线下面积(AUC)、从时间0到无穷大的AUC以及12小时时的血浆浓度(C)的平均值(变异系数百分比)分别为43,729小时纳克/毫升(32.7)、45,460小时纳克/毫升(36.8)和988.4纳克/毫升(27.5);福沙匹坦的相应值分别为44,130小时纳克/毫升(32.0)、46,163小时纳克/毫升(36.6)和1,022纳克/毫升(28.5)。此外,90%置信区间(94.186 - 101.354)在生物等效性界限(80% - 125%)内。在开始输注后1小时内,1名(1%)HTX-019受试者报告了1例TEAE,而20名(20%)福沙匹坦受试者报告了32例TEAE。三名福沙匹坦受试者出现呼吸困难(两名受试者在<1分钟时出现,一名受试者在18分钟时出现,被认为与研究药物有关),一名HTX-019受试者出现呼吸困难(在120小时时出现,与呼吸道感染有关,被认为与研究药物无关)。未发生严重TEAE、严重不良事件或死亡;所有TEAE均得到缓解。

结论

HTX-019与福沙匹坦生物等效,对于预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐,可能是福沙匹坦的一种更安全的替代药物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc4/5837372/f47cad59db8f/dddt-12-429Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc4/5837372/758b1eb79533/dddt-12-429Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc4/5837372/72b75e38fd34/dddt-12-429Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc4/5837372/f47cad59db8f/dddt-12-429Fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc4/5837372/758b1eb79533/dddt-12-429Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc4/5837372/72b75e38fd34/dddt-12-429Fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abc4/5837372/f47cad59db8f/dddt-12-429Fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Bioequivalence of HTX-019 (aprepitant IV) and fosaprepitant in healthy subjects: a Phase I, open-label, randomized, two-way crossover evaluation.HTX-019(阿瑞匹坦静脉注射剂)与磷丙泊酚二钠在健康受试者中的生物等效性:一项I期、开放标签、随机、双向交叉评估。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2018 Mar 1;12:429-435. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S155875. eCollection 2018.
2
Safety of HTX-019 (intravenous aprepitant) and fosaprepitant in healthy subjects.HTX-019(静脉用阿瑞匹坦)和福沙匹坦在健康受试者中的安全性。
Future Oncol. 2018 Nov;14(27):2849-2859. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0311. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
3
HTX-019 via 2-min injection or 30-min infusion in healthy subjects.健康受试者通过 2 分钟注射或 30 分钟输注 HTX-019。
Future Oncol. 2019 Mar;15(8):865-874. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0809. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
4
Tolerability of fosaprepitant and bioequivalency to aprepitant in healthy subjects.福沙匹坦在健康受试者中的耐受性及其与阿瑞匹坦的生物等效性。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jul;47(7):834-40. doi: 10.1177/0091270007301800. Epub 2007 May 24.
5
Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Fosaprepitant Dimeglumine in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: Bioequivalence Study.福沙匹坦双葡甲胺在中国健康志愿者中的药代动力学和安全性:生物等效性研究。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021 Jul;10(7):748-755. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.892. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
6
Pharmacokinetic evaluation of fosaprepitant dimeglumine.福沙匹坦二甲葡胺的药代动力学评价。
Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2010 Oct;6(10):1277-86. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2010.513970.
7
Safety profile of HTX-019 administered as an intravenous push in cancer patients: a retrospective review.静脉推注 HTX-019 用于癌症患者的安全性特征:回顾性研究。
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2020 Feb;19(2):205-210. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1691521. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
8
Safety Profile of HTX-019 Administered as an Intravenous Push in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Review.在癌症患者中静脉推注 HTX-019 的安全性概况:回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):662-669. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0877-3. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
HTX-019: polysorbate 80- and synthetic surfactant-free neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting prophylaxis.HTX-019:一种无聚山梨酯 80 和合成表面活性剂的神经激肽 1 受体拮抗剂,用于预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐。
Future Oncol. 2019 Jan;15(3):241-255. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0577. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
10
Equivalent dynamic human brain NK1-receptor occupancy following single-dose i.v. fosaprepitant vs. oral aprepitant as assessed by PET imaging.通过 PET 成像评估单次静脉注射福沙匹坦与口服阿瑞匹坦后等效的动态人脑中 NK1 受体占有率。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Aug;92(2):243-50. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2012.62. Epub 2012 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges in the Development of Intravenous Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists: Results of a Safety and Pharmacokinetics Dose-Finding, Phase 1 Study of Intravenous Fosnetupitant.静脉注射神经激肽-1 受体拮抗剂研发面临的挑战:福沙那肽静脉注射的安全性和药代动力学剂量确定、I 期研究结果。
Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2022 Dec;11(12):1405-1418. doi: 10.1002/cpdd.1183. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
2
Study on the method to avoid infusion-site adverse events following chemotherapeutic treatment with epirubicin and fosaprepitant using immortalized human umbilical vein endothelial cells.使用永生化人脐静脉内皮细胞研究避免表柔比星和磷丙泊酚胺化疗后输液部位不良事件的方法。
Oncol Lett. 2022 Sep 16;24(5):386. doi: 10.3892/ol.2022.13506. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-analysis of safety and efficacy of rolapitant, NK-1 receptor antagonist for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.罗哌丁胺(一种用于预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的NK-1受体拮抗剂)安全性和有效性的荟萃分析。
Curr Probl Cancer. 2018 Mar-Apr;42(2):241-255. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
2
Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.止吐药:美国临床肿瘤学会临床实践指南更新。
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3240-3261. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.4789. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
3
2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: Prevention of nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.
A Pragmatic Study Evaluating NEPA Versus Aprepitant for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy.一项评价奈妥匹坦与阿瑞匹坦预防接受中度致吐性化疗患者化疗所致恶心呕吐的实用研究。
Oncologist. 2021 Oct;26(10):e1870-e1879. doi: 10.1002/onco.13888. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
Phase IIIb Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous NEPA for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting (CINV) in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Initial and Repeat Cycles of Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide (AC) Chemotherapy.静脉注射 NEPA 预防乳腺癌患者初始和重复蒽环类和环磷酰胺(AC)化疗引起的化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)的 IIIb 期安全性和疗效。
Oncologist. 2020 Mar;25(3):e589-e597. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0527. Epub 2019 Dec 8.
5
Safety Profile of HTX-019 Administered as an Intravenous Infusion in Patients With Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.HTX-019静脉输注给药用于癌症患者的安全性概况:一项回顾性分析。
J Infus Nurs. 2019 Sep/Oct;42(5):260-263. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000341.
6
Study on the infusion-site adverse events and vascular distribution of epirubicin in chemotherapy with epirubicin and fosaprepitant.表柔比星与磷丙泊酚替罗非联合化疗中表柔比星输注部位不良事件及血管分布的研究
Mol Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul;11(1):43-49. doi: 10.3892/mco.2019.1849. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
7
Crossover safety study of aprepitant: 2-min injection vs 30-min infusion in cancer patients receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.阿瑞匹坦的交叉安全性研究:接受致吐性化疗的癌症患者中2分钟注射与30分钟输注的比较
Onco Targets Ther. 2019 Apr 30;12:3277-3284. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S201609. eCollection 2019.
8
Safety Profile of HTX-019 Administered as an Intravenous Push in Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Review.在癌症患者中静脉推注 HTX-019 的安全性概况:回顾性研究。
Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):662-669. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0877-3. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
9
Evolving role of neurokinin 1-receptor antagonists for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.神经激肽1受体拮抗剂在化疗引起的恶心和呕吐治疗中的作用演变
Onco Targets Ther. 2018 Oct 4;11:6459-6478. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S158570. eCollection 2018.
2016年更新的MASCC/ESMO共识建议:中度致吐性化疗后恶心和呕吐的预防
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):289-294. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3365-1. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
4
2016 Updated MASCC/ESMO Consensus Recommendations: Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting Following High Emetic Risk Chemotherapy.2016年更新的MASCC/ESMO共识建议:高致吐风险化疗后恶心和呕吐的预防
Support Care Cancer. 2017 Jan;25(1):277-288. doi: 10.1007/s00520-016-3313-0. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists for Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.神经激肽-1受体拮抗剂预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效与安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(4):1661-75. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.4.1661.
6
Infusion site adverse events in breast cancer patients receiving highly emetic chemotherapy with prophylactic anti-emetic treatment with aprepitant and fosaprepitant: A retrospective comparison.接受阿瑞匹坦和磷丙泊酚二钠预防性止吐治疗的高度致吐性化疗乳腺癌患者的输液部位不良事件:一项回顾性比较
Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;4(4):603-606. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.769. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind phase III trial.单剂量福沙匹坦预防与中度致吐性化疗相关的化疗引起的恶心和呕吐:一项随机、双盲III期试验的结果
Ann Oncol. 2016 Jan;27(1):172-8. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv482. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
8
Treatment of Breakthrough and Refractory Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting.突破性和难治性化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的治疗
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:595894. doi: 10.1155/2015/595894. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
Aprepitant and fosaprepitant: a 10-year review of efficacy and safety.阿瑞匹坦和福沙匹坦:疗效与安全性的10年回顾
Oncologist. 2015 Apr;20(4):450-8. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0229. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
10
Differential impact of fosaprepitant on infusion site adverse events between cisplatin- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens.福沙匹坦对基于顺铂和蒽环类药物化疗方案的输液部位不良事件的不同影响。
Anticancer Res. 2015 Jan;35(1):379-83.