Tsuda Takashi, Kyomori Chisato, Mizukami Takuro, Taniyama Tomoko, Izawa Naoki, Horie Yoshiki, Hirakawa Mami, Ogura Takashi, Nakajima Takako Eguchi, Tsugawa Koichiro, Boku Narikazu
Department of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan.
Department of Nursing, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki 216-8511, Japan.
Mol Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr;4(4):603-606. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.769. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
The incidences of infusion site adverse events in chemotherapy regimens, including anthracyclines with either fosaprepitant or aprepitant as the anti-emetic, were not highlighted in the randomized trial comparing aprepitant and fosaprepitant. The present retrospective analysis was performed in breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, a combination of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with or without 5-fluorouracil as the adjuvant or neoadjuvant, at the outpatient infusion center of St. Marianna University Hospital (Kawasaki, Japan). Infusion site adverse events were retrospectively compared between the 3 months prior to and three months following switching from 3 day oral administration of aprepitant to intravenous infusion of fosaprepitant. A total of 62 patients were included in the aprepitant group and 38 in the fosaprepitant group. Of these patients, 26 (42%) in the aprepitant group and 36 patients (96%) in the fosaprepitant group experienced any grade of infusion site adverse events at least once (P<0.001). As an anti-emetic treatment for chemotherapy using anthracyclines, fosaprepitant may be associated with a higher risk of infusion site adverse events compared with aprepitant.
在比较阿瑞匹坦和福沙匹坦的随机试验中,未突出化疗方案中输注部位不良事件的发生率,这些化疗方案包括以福沙匹坦或阿瑞匹坦作为止吐药的蒽环类药物。本回顾性分析在圣玛丽安娜大学医院(日本川崎)门诊输液中心接受含蒽环类药物化疗的乳腺癌患者中进行,这些化疗方案为表柔比星和环磷酰胺联合或不联合5-氟尿嘧啶作为辅助或新辅助治疗。对从口服阿瑞匹坦3天改为静脉输注福沙匹坦之前3个月和之后3个月的输注部位不良事件进行回顾性比较。阿瑞匹坦组共纳入62例患者,福沙匹坦组纳入38例患者。在这些患者中,阿瑞匹坦组有26例(42%),福沙匹坦组有36例(96%)至少经历过一次任何级别的输注部位不良事件(P<0.001)。作为使用蒽环类药物化疗的止吐治疗,与阿瑞匹坦相比,福沙匹坦可能与更高的输注部位不良事件风险相关。