• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries.与程序性镇静相关不良事件及其后果的临床和经济负担:来自五个国家的分析
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Feb 28;14:393-401. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S154720. eCollection 2018.
2
Capnography monitoring in procedural intravenous sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.在程序性静脉镇静中进行二氧化碳描记监测:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Nov;24(11):3761-3770. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03395-1. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Results from the Adverse Event Sedation Reporting Tool: A Global Anthology of 7952 Records Derived from >160,000 Procedural Sedation Encounters.不良事件镇静报告工具的结果:来自超过160,000例程序性镇静记录的7952条记录的全球选集。
J Clin Med. 2019 Dec 1;8(12):2087. doi: 10.3390/jcm8122087.
4
Cost and economic burden of adverse events associated with metastatic melanoma treatments in five countries.五个国家中与转移性黑色素瘤治疗相关不良事件的成本和经济负担。
J Med Econ. 2016 Sep;19(9):900-12. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1184155. Epub 2016 May 30.
5
Safety and efficacy of physician-administered balanced-sedation for the endoscopic mucosal resection of large non-pedunculated colorectal polyps.医生实施的平衡镇静用于大型无蒂结直肠息肉内镜黏膜切除术的安全性和有效性。
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Jan 5;12(1):E1-E10. doi: 10.1055/a-2180-8880. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Adverse events of procedural sedation and analgesia in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊科程序性镇静和镇痛的不良事件
Ann Emerg Med. 1999 Oct;34(4 Pt 1):483-91. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(99)80050-x.
7
Provision of deep procedural sedation by a pediatric sedation team at a freestanding imaging center.由独立影像中心的儿科镇静团队提供深度程序镇静。
Pediatr Radiol. 2014 Aug;44(8):1020-5. doi: 10.1007/s00247-014-2942-z. Epub 2014 May 24.
8
Incidence of adverse events in paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊科儿童程序性镇静中不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 15;6(6):e011384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011384.
9
Pediatric critical care physician-administered procedural sedation using propofol: a report from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium Database.儿科危重病医师实施丙泊酚程序化镇静:儿科镇静研究联合会数据库的报告。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;16(1):11-20. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000273.
10
Using continuous quantitative capnography for emergency department procedural sedation: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.使用连续定量二氧化碳描记术进行急诊科程序镇静:系统评价和成本效益分析。
Intern Emerg Med. 2018 Jan;13(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1587-3. Epub 2016 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Does capnography improve safety in moderate-deep sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures provided by anaesthesiologists? A prospective cohort study.对于麻醉医生实施的胃肠内镜检查中度至深度镇静,二氧化碳描记法能否提高安全性?一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2025 May 26. doi: 10.1007/s10877-025-01299-7.
2
Cryoballoon Ablation With the POLARx FIT or the Arctic Front Advance Pro for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Health Economic Analysis.使用POLARx FIT或北极前线高级版冷冻球囊消融术治疗阵发性心房颤动的卫生经济学分析。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 Apr 21;12(1):155-161. doi: 10.36469/001c.133223. eCollection 2025.
3
Evaluating Remimazolam for Procedural Sedation.评估瑞马唑仑用于程序性镇静的效果。
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2025;23(9):1009-1020. doi: 10.2174/011570159X367968250117034551.
4
Sedation reversal trends at outpatient ambulatory endoscopic center in-hospital ambulatory procedure center using a triage protocol.在门诊日间内镜中心和院内日间手术中心采用分诊方案的镇静逆转趋势。
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jul 16;16(7):413-423. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v16.i7.413.
5
Up-to-date literature review and issues of sedation during digestive endoscopy.消化内镜检查期间镇静的最新文献综述及相关问题
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2023 Sep;18(3):418-435. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2023.127854. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Patient Safety during Propofol Sedation before and after Implementation of Capnography Monitoring.实施二氧化碳监测前后丙泊酚镇静期间的患者安全
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 14;12(18):5959. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185959.
7
Cost-effectiveness of mechanical thromboprophylaxis for cesarean deliveries in Brazil.巴西剖宫产术机械性血栓预防的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287812. eCollection 2023.
8
Service Evaluation of the Impact of Capnography on the Safety of Procedural Sedation.二氧化碳监测对程序性镇静安全性影响的服务评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 May 6;9:867536. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.867536. eCollection 2022.
9
Comparing a Virtual Reality-Based Simulation App (VR-MRI) With a Standard Preparatory Manual and Child Life Program for Improving Success and Reducing Anxiety During Pediatric Medical Imaging: Randomized Clinical Trial.比较基于虚拟现实的模拟应用程序 (VR-MRI) 与标准预备手册和儿童生活计划,以提高儿科医学成像成功率并降低焦虑:随机临床试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 22;23(9):e22942. doi: 10.2196/22942.
10
Antihistamine effects and safety of fexofenadine: a systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.抗组胺药法西替丁的作用和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2019 Nov 29;20(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40360-019-0363-1.

本文引用的文献

1
How to improve patient satisfaction during midazolam sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy?如何在咪达唑仑镇静下进行胃肠内镜检查时提高患者满意度?
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Feb 14;23(6):1098-1105. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i6.1098.
2
Growth of Nonoperating Room Anesthesia Care in the United States: A Contemporary Trends Analysis.美国非手术室麻醉护理的增长:当代趋势分析。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1261-1267. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001734.
3
A Systematic Review of Factors Associated With Utilization of Monitored Anesthesia Care for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.一项关于与胃肠内镜检查监护麻醉使用相关因素的系统评价
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2016 Jun;12(6):361-70.
4
Incidence of adverse events in paediatric procedural sedation in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.急诊科儿童程序性镇静中不良事件的发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2016 Jun 15;6(6):e011384. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011384.
5
Modeling the costs and benefits of capnography monitoring during procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy.模拟胃肠内镜检查过程中实施程序性镇静时二氧化碳监测的成本与效益
Endosc Int Open. 2016 Mar;4(3):E340-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-100719.
6
Capnographic Monitoring in Routine EGD and Colonoscopy With Moderate Sedation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial.常规内镜检查和中度镇静下的二氧化碳监测:一项前瞻性、随机、对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;111(3):395-404. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.437. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
7
Considerable Variability of Procedural Sedation and Analgesia Practices for Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures in Europe.欧洲胃肠道内镜检查中程序镇静和镇痛实践存在相当大的差异。
Clin Endosc. 2016 Jan;49(1):47-55. doi: 10.5946/ce.2016.49.1.47. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
8
Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) vs propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia: systematic review and meta-analysis.氯胺酮-丙泊酚联合用药(氯胺酮-丙泊酚合剂)与丙泊酚用于操作过程中的镇静和镇痛:系统评价与荟萃分析
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;34(3):558-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.074. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
9
Incidence of Adverse Events in Adults Undergoing Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急诊科接受程序性镇静的成人不良事件发生率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Feb;23(2):119-34. doi: 10.1111/acem.12875. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
10
Capnographic monitoring of midazolam and propofol sedation during ERCP: a randomized controlled study (EndoBreath Study).内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)期间咪达唑仑和丙泊酚镇静的二氧化碳波形图监测:一项随机对照研究(EndoBreath研究)
Endoscopy. 2016 Jan;48(1):42-50. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393117. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

与程序性镇静相关不良事件及其后果的临床和经济负担:来自五个国家的分析

Clinical and economic burden of procedural sedation-related adverse events and their outcomes: analysis from five countries.

作者信息

Saunders Rhodri, Davis Jason A, Kranke Peter, Weissbrod Rachel, Whitaker David K, Lightdale Jenifer R

机构信息

Coreva Scientific GmbH & Co KG, Freiburg, Germany.

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Feb 28;14:393-401. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S154720. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S154720
PMID:29535525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5836671/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported on the incidence of sedation-related adverse events (AEs), but little is known about their impact on health care costs and resource use.

METHODS

Health care providers and payers in five countries were recruited for an online survey by independent administrators to ensure that investigators and respondents were blinded to each other. Surveys were conducted in the local language and began with a "screener" to ensure that respondents had relevant expertise and experience. Responses were analyzed using Excel and R, with the Dixon's statistic used to identify and remove outliers. Global and country-specific average treatment patterns were calculated via bootstrapping; costs were mean values. The sum product of costs and intervention probability gave a cost per AE.

RESULTS

Responses were received from 101 providers and 26 payers, the majority having >5 years of experience. At a minimum, the respondents performed a total of 3,430 procedural sedations per month. All AEs detailed occurred in clinical practice in the last year and were reported to cause procedural delays and cancellations in some patients. Standard procedural sedation costs ranged from €74 (Germany) to $2,300 (US). Respondents estimated that AEs would increase costs by between 16% (Italy) and 179% (US). Hypotension was reported as the most commonly observed AE with an associated global mean cost (interquartile range) of $43 ($27-$68). Other frequent AEs, including mild hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, mild oxygen desaturation, hypertension, and brief apnea, were estimated to increase health care spending on procedural sedation by $2.2 billion annually in the US.

CONCLUSION

All sedation-related AEs can increase health care costs and result in substantial delays or cancellations of subsequent procedures. The prevention of even minor AEs during procedural sedation may be crucial to ensuring its value as a health care service.

摘要

背景

已有研究报道了与镇静相关的不良事件(AE)的发生率,但对于这些事件对医疗保健成本和资源使用的影响却知之甚少。

方法

五个国家的医疗保健提供者和支付方由独立管理人员招募参加在线调查,以确保调查人员和受访者相互不知情。调查以当地语言进行,并以一个“筛选器”开始,以确保受访者具备相关专业知识和经验。使用Excel和R对回复进行分析,采用狄克逊统计量来识别和去除异常值。通过自展法计算全球和特定国家的平均治疗模式;成本为平均值。成本与干预概率的乘积得出每个不良事件的成本。

结果

收到了101名提供者和26名支付方的回复,大多数人有超过5年的经验。受访者每月至少总共进行3430例程序性镇静。所有详细的不良事件均发生在过去一年的临床实践中,并据报道在一些患者中导致了程序延误和取消。标准程序性镇静成本从74欧元(德国)到2300美元(美国)不等。受访者估计,不良事件将使成本增加16%(意大利)至179%(美国)。据报告,低血压是最常观察到的不良事件,相关的全球平均成本(四分位间距)为43美元(27 - 68美元)。其他常见的不良事件,包括轻度低血压、心动过缓、心动过速、轻度氧饱和度降低、高血压和短暂呼吸暂停,估计每年会使美国程序性镇静的医疗保健支出增加22亿美元。

结论

所有与镇静相关的不良事件都会增加医疗保健成本,并导致后续程序的大量延误或取消。在程序性镇静期间预防即使是轻微的不良事件对于确保其作为一种医疗保健服务的价值可能至关重要。