• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知失调如何影响沉没成本效应?

How does cognitive dissonance influence the sunk cost effect?

作者信息

Chung Shao-Hsi, Cheng Kuo-Chih

机构信息

Department of Business Administration, Meiho University, Pingtung, Taiwan.

Department of Accounting, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua City, Taiwan.

出版信息

Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 Mar 1;11:37-45. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S150494. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S150494
PMID:29535561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5840294/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The sunk cost effect is the scenario when individuals are willing to continue to invest capital in a failing project. The purpose of this study was to explain such irrational behavior by exploring how sunk costs affect individuals' willingness to continue investing in an unfavorable project and to understand the role of cognitive dissonance on the sunk cost effect.

METHODS

This study used an experimental questionnaire survey on managers of firms listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange and Over-The-Counter.

RESULTS

The empirical results show that cognitive dissonance does not mediate the relationship between sunk costs and willingness to continue an unfavorable investment project. However, cognitive dissonance has a moderating effect, and only when the level of cognitive dissonance is high does the sunk cost have significantly positive impacts on willingness to continue on with an unfavorable investment.

CONCLUSION

This study offers psychological mechanisms to explain the sunk cost effect based on the theory of cognitive dissonance, and it also provides some recommendations for corporate management.

摘要

背景

沉没成本效应是指个体愿意继续在一个失败的项目中投入资金的情况。本研究的目的是通过探究沉没成本如何影响个体继续投资于不利项目的意愿,并理解认知失调在沉没成本效应中的作用,来解释这种非理性行为。

方法

本研究对在台湾证券交易所和柜台买卖中心上市的公司经理进行了实验问卷调查。

结果

实证结果表明,认知失调并未在沉没成本与继续不利投资项目的意愿之间起中介作用。然而,认知失调具有调节作用,只有当认知失调程度较高时,沉没成本才会对继续不利投资的意愿产生显著的正向影响。

结论

本研究基于认知失调理论提供了心理机制来解释沉没成本效应,同时也为企业管理提供了一些建议。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fba/5840294/5485253a0e99/prbm-11-037Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fba/5840294/5485253a0e99/prbm-11-037Fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8fba/5840294/5485253a0e99/prbm-11-037Fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
How does cognitive dissonance influence the sunk cost effect?认知失调如何影响沉没成本效应?
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2018 Mar 1;11:37-45. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S150494. eCollection 2018.
2
A query theory account of the effect of memory retrieval on the sunk cost bias.查询理论对记忆检索对沉没成本偏差影响的解释。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Aug;18(4):767-73. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0099-4.
3
Mindfulness and decision making: sunk costs or escalation of commitment?正念与决策:沉没成本还是承诺升级?
Cogn Process. 2020 Aug;21(3):391-402. doi: 10.1007/s10339-020-00978-4. Epub 2020 May 21.
4
The feeling of throwing good money after bad: The role of affective reaction in the sunk-cost fallacy.把好钱扔在坏的后面的感觉:情感反应在沉没成本谬误中的作用。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 8;14(1):e0209900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209900. eCollection 2019.
5
Ketamine reverses stress-induced hypersensitivity to sunk costs.氯胺酮可逆转应激诱导的对沉没成本的超敏反应。
bioRxiv. 2024 May 14:2024.05.12.593597. doi: 10.1101/2024.05.12.593597.
6
Sunk costs under stress: Acute stress reduces the impact of past expenses on risky decisions.压力下的沉没成本:急性应激会降低过去的支出对风险决策的影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Mar;137:105632. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105632. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
The sunk cost effect across species: A review of persistence in a course of action due to prior investment.跨物种的沉没成本效应:对因先前投资而在行动过程中持续坚持的综述。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2016 May;105(3):339-61. doi: 10.1002/jeab.202. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
Harm to others reduces the sunk-cost effect.伤害他人会降低沉没成本效应。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Apr;49(3):544-556. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01112-7. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
9
Blind to Bias? Young Children Do Not Anticipate that Sunk Costs Lead to Irrational Choices.盲目偏见?幼儿不认为沉没成本导致非理性选择。
Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;45(11):e13063. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13063.
10
What were they thinking? Reducing sunk-cost bias in a life-span sample.他们在想什么?减少寿命样本中的沉没成本偏差。
Psychol Aging. 2016 Nov;31(7):724-736. doi: 10.1037/pag0000130.

本文引用的文献

1
Sunk-cost effects on purely behavioral investments.沉没成本对纯粹行为投资的影响。
Cogn Sci. 2009 Jan;33(1):105-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2008.01005.x.
2
On the Observability of Purely Behavioral Sunk-Cost Effects: Theoretical and Empirical Support for the BISC Model.纯粹行为沉没成本效应的可观察性:BISC 模型的理论和实证支持。
Cogn Sci. 2010 Nov;34(8):1384-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01143.x. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
3
Impact of decision goal on escalation.决策目标对升级的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002 Nov;111(3):309-22. doi: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00056-2.
4
On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning.论三段论推理中逻辑与信念的冲突
Mem Cognit. 1983 May;11(3):295-306. doi: 10.3758/bf03196976.
5
The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.社会心理学研究中的调节变量与中介变量区分:概念、策略及统计考量
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.