Park Se-Ho, Cho Sung-Hee, Han Ji-Young
Department of Dentistry and Periodontology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Feb 27;48(1):22-33. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.1.22. eCollection 2018 Feb.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the modified plaque score (MPS) for assessing the oral hygiene status of periodontitis patients.
A total of 116 patients were included in this study. After evaluation of the Löe and Silness gingival index (GI), Silness and Löe plaque index (PlI), O'Leary plaque control record (PCR), and MPS, patients were randomly assigned to either a conventional tooth brushing instruction (C-TBI) group (n=56) or a professional intraoral tooth brushing instruction (P-TBI) group (n=60). The MPS and clinical parameters were re-evaluated after scaling and a series of root planing. The convergent validity of MPS with the PlI and PCR was assessed. The measurement time for MPS and PCR was compared according to the proficiency of the examiner.
After root planing, the GI, PlI, PCR, and MPS improved from their respective baseline values in both groups. Three different plaque indices including the MPS, showed significant differences between the C-TBI group and the P-TBI group after root planing. The MPS showed significant concurrence with the PCR and PlI. The mean time for PCR measurement was 2.76±0.71 times longer than that for MPS measurement after 2 weeks of training.
MPS seems to be a practical plaque scoring system compared with the PlI and PCR. These findings suggest that repetitive plaque control combined with an easily applicable plaque index (MPS) may facilitate more effective oral hygiene education and improved periodontal health.
本研究旨在评估改良菌斑评分(MPS)在评估牙周炎患者口腔卫生状况方面的有效性。
本研究共纳入116例患者。在评估洛和西尔尼斯牙龈指数(GI)、西尔尼斯和洛菌斑指数(PlI)、奥利里菌斑控制记录(PCR)以及MPS后,患者被随机分为传统刷牙指导(C-TBI)组(n = 56)或专业口腔内刷牙指导(P-TBI)组(n = 60)。在进行洁治和一系列根面平整后,对MPS和临床参数进行重新评估。评估MPS与PlI和PCR的收敛效度。根据检查者的熟练程度比较MPS和PCR的测量时间。
根面平整后,两组的GI、PlI、PCR和MPS均从各自的基线值有所改善。根面平整后,包括MPS在内的三种不同菌斑指数在C-TBI组和P-TBI组之间显示出显著差异。MPS与PCR和PlI显示出显著的一致性。训练2周后,PCR测量的平均时间比MPS测量的平均时间长2.76±0.71倍。
与PlI和PCR相比,MPS似乎是一种实用的菌斑评分系统。这些发现表明,重复的菌斑控制结合易于应用的菌斑指数(MPS)可能有助于更有效的口腔卫生教育和改善牙周健康。