University Hospital Henri Mondor, Department of Cardiology, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, Créteil, 94000, France.
University Hospital Pitié-Salpetrière, Cardiology Unit, 47-83 bd de l'hôpital, Paris, 75013, France.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):1380-1386. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27594. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
This study aimed to assess the impact of pacemaker mode programming on clinical outcomes in patients with high-degree atrioventricular conduction disturbance (AVCD) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).
Although high-degree AVCD after TAVI can receive pacemaker, recovery of the AVCD is often observed. Specific pacemaker algorithms (AAI-DDD mode switch) are available which favor spontaneous atrioventricular conduction.
Of 1,621 consecutive multi-center TAVI patients, 269 (16.4%) received pacemaker. We retrospectively included 91 patients with persistent high-degree AVCD at hospital discharge. Pacemaker dependency was defined as absence, inadequate intrinsic ventricular rhythm, or ventricular pacing time > 95% on pacemaker interrogation during follow-up. Comparison of heart failure hospitalization and death between conventional DDD (cDDD) and other modes was examined (AAI-DDD and VVI).
During a mean follow-up duration of 13 months, the pacemaker dependency rate was 52.8%. Patients with cDDD mode (N = 36: 40.0%) had significantly more pacemaker dependency. Multivariate analysis showed that cDDD mode was independently associated with pacemaker dependency (odds ratio = 3.63, P = 0.03). Moreover, cDDD patients had a significant higher incidence of heart failure hospitalization (Hospitalization: cDDD vs. others = 45.4% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.03) and had a higher incidence of mortality (Death: cDDD vs. the others = 27.0% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.06).
Up to half of patients implanted for high-degree AVCD after TAVI had conduction recovery. Patients with cDDD programming at hospital discharge had more pacemaker dependency and a worse cardiac prognosis. Thus, pacemaker mode should be systematically set to promote spontaneous atrioventricular conduction in patients with pacemaker implantation after TAVI.
本研究旨在评估房室传导阻滞(AVCD)患者经导管主动脉瓣植入(TAVI)后起搏器模式程控对临床结局的影响。
虽然 TAVI 后出现高度 AVCD 可植入起搏器,但 AVCD 常可恢复。目前有特定的起搏器算法(AAI-DDD 模式切换)可促进自主房室传导。
在 1621 例连续多中心 TAVI 患者中,269 例(16.4%)植入了起搏器。我们回顾性纳入了 91 例在出院时仍存在持续性高度 AVCD 的患者。起搏器依赖定义为随访时起搏器检查中存在无固有心室节律、固有心室节律不足或心室起搏时间>95%。比较了传统 DDD(cDDD)与其他模式(AAI-DDD 和 VVI)之间心力衰竭住院和死亡的差异。
在平均 13 个月的随访期间,起搏器依赖率为 52.8%。cDDD 模式组(N=36:40.0%)的起搏器依赖发生率显著更高。多变量分析显示,cDDD 模式与起搏器依赖独立相关(优势比=3.63,P=0.03)。此外,cDDD 患者心力衰竭住院发生率显著更高(住院:cDDD 与其他模式=45.4%与 18.2%,P=0.03),死亡率也更高(死亡:cDDD 与其他模式=27.0%与 4.4%,P=0.06)。
TAVI 后植入起搏器治疗高度 AVCD 的患者中,有一半可能恢复传导。出院时采用 cDDD 程控的患者更依赖起搏器,心脏预后更差。因此,TAVI 后植入起搏器的患者应系统地设置起搏器模式,以促进自主房室传导。