• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

豚鼠在大声暴露期间耳蜗血流的激光多普勒测量。

Laser Doppler measurements of cochlear blood flow during loud sound exposure in the guinea pig.

作者信息

Thorne P R, Nuttall A L

出版信息

Hear Res. 1987;27(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90021-9.

DOI:10.1016/0378-5955(87)90021-9
PMID:2953704
Abstract

This investigation examined the effects of loud sound of different frequencies and intensities on cochlear blood flow as measured by the laser Doppler flowmeter. Cochlear blood flow was measured in anesthetized guinea pigs during a 1 h exposure to either a 2, 4, or 12 kHz pure tone or high-pass noise (10-40 kHz) at 90, 103, or 110 dB SPL. Cochlear function was assessed using the compound action potential audiogram before and after exposure. There was no change in blood flow in the second turn with a 2, 4, or 12 kHz tone but there was a significant (P less than 0.05) decline in flow in the first cochlear turn at the end of either the 12 kHz tone or high-pass noise exposure at 103 and 110 dB SPL. There were elevations in the thresholds of the cochlear compound action potential after all but the 90 dB exposures to 12 kHz or high-pass noise. No such changes were observed in blood flow or electrophysiology in control animals. These findings demonstrate that there is a small but significant decline in cochlear blood flow with high intensity sound exposure. However, the relationship between this change in blood flow and the development of cochlear damage is unclear.

摘要

本研究通过激光多普勒血流仪检测了不同频率和强度的大声响对耳蜗血流的影响。在麻醉的豚鼠暴露于2、4或12千赫纯音或90、103或110分贝声压级的高通噪声(10 - 40千赫)1小时期间,测量耳蜗血流。在暴露前后使用复合动作电位听力图评估耳蜗功能。2、4或12千赫音调刺激时第二圈血流无变化,但在12千赫音调或103和110分贝声压级的高通噪声暴露结束时,第一耳蜗圈血流显著(P小于0.05)下降。除了90分贝暴露于12千赫或高通噪声外,所有其他暴露后耳蜗复合动作电位阈值均升高。在对照动物中未观察到血流或电生理学的此类变化。这些发现表明,高强度声音暴露会使耳蜗血流出现小但显著的下降。然而,这种血流变化与耳蜗损伤发展之间的关系尚不清楚。

相似文献

1
Laser Doppler measurements of cochlear blood flow during loud sound exposure in the guinea pig.豚鼠在大声暴露期间耳蜗血流的激光多普勒测量。
Hear Res. 1987;27(1):1-10. doi: 10.1016/0378-5955(87)90021-9.
2
Intensity-related changes in cochlear blood flow in the guinea pig during and following acoustic exposure.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1993;250(5):281-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00186226.
3
Effect of loud sound exposure on the cochlear blood flow.大声暴露对耳蜗血流的影响。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1990 May-Jun;109(5-6):378-82. doi: 10.3109/00016489009125158.
4
Effects of frequency and intensity of sound on cochlear blood flow.声音频率和强度对耳蜗血流的影响。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1992;112(1):59-64. doi: 10.3109/00016489209100783.
5
Laser Doppler measurements of cochlear blood flow during loud sound presentation.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;247(2):84-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00183173.
6
Effect of vasodilating agents on cochlear blood flow under loud sound exposure.扩血管剂对大声暴露下耳蜗血流的影响。
Acta Otolaryngol. 1990 Nov-Dec;110(5-6):394-8. doi: 10.3109/00016489009107460.
7
Noise-induced cochlear hypoxia is intensity dependent, correlates with hearing loss and precedes reduction of cochlear blood flow.噪声性耳蜗缺氧与强度有关,与听力损失相关,且先于耳蜗血流减少出现。
Audiol Neurootol. 1996 May-Jun;1(3):148-60. doi: 10.1159/000259195.
8
Alterations in oxygenation of cochlear endolymph during loud sound exposure.
Acta Otolaryngol. 1989 Jan-Feb;107(1-2):71-9. doi: 10.3109/00016488909127481.
9
Laser Doppler measurement of cochlear blood flow changes during conditioning noise exposure.在条件性噪声暴露期间,通过激光多普勒测量耳蜗血流变化。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2001 Jun;121(4):465-9.
10
Electrophysiological determinations of the effects of 1 kHz noise exposure on the high-frequency hearing of guinea pigs.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1990;247(4):206-10. doi: 10.1007/BF00178985.

引用本文的文献

1
Role of Oxidative Stress in Sensorineural Hearing Loss.氧化应激在感音神经性听力损失中的作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Apr 9;25(8):4146. doi: 10.3390/ijms25084146.
2
Norepinephrine protects against cochlear outer hair cell damage and noise-induced hearing loss via α-adrenergic receptor.去甲肾上腺素通过 α-肾上腺素能受体保护耳蜗外毛细胞免受损伤和噪声性听力损失。
BMC Neurosci. 2024 Jan 30;25(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12868-024-00845-4.
3
Association between Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Ménière's Disease: A Nested Case-Control Study Using a National Health Screening Cohort.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病与梅尼埃病的相关性:一项基于全国健康筛查队列的巢式病例对照研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 24;18(9):4536. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094536.
4
The mechanoelectrical transducer channel is not required for regulation of cochlear blood flow during loud sound exposure in mice.在小鼠强声暴露过程中,机械电换能器通道对于耳蜗血流调节并非必需。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 8;10(1):9229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66192-6.
5
Use of the guinea pig in studies on the development and prevention of acquired sensorineural hearing loss, with an emphasis on noise.在研究获得性感觉神经性听力损失的发展和预防中使用豚鼠,重点是噪声。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 Nov;146(5):3743. doi: 10.1121/1.5132711.
6
Targeting Inflammatory Processes Mediated by TRPVI and TNF-α for Treating Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.靶向由TRPVI和TNF-α介导的炎症过程治疗噪声性听力损失
Front Cell Neurosci. 2019 Oct 3;13:444. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00444. eCollection 2019.
7
Revealing the morphology and function of the cochlea and middle ear with optical coherence tomography.利用光学相干断层扫描揭示耳蜗和中耳的形态与功能。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2019 May;9(5):858-881. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.05.10.
8
Purinergic Signaling and Cochlear Injury-Targeting the Immune System?嘌呤能信号与耳蜗损伤——靶向免疫系统?
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 18;20(12):2979. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122979.
9
Human inner ear blood supply revisited: the Uppsala collection of temporal bone-an international resource of education and collaboration.重新审视人类内耳血液供应:乌普萨拉颞骨库——教育和合作的国际资源。
Ups J Med Sci. 2018 Sep;123(3):131-142. doi: 10.1080/03009734.2018.1492654. Epub 2018 Sep 11.
10
An Oral Combination of Vitamins A, C, E, and Mg Improves Auditory Thresholds in Age-Related Hearing Loss.维生素A、C、E和镁的口服组合可改善年龄相关性听力损失的听觉阈值。
Front Neurosci. 2018 Jul 31;12:527. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00527. eCollection 2018.