• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛可减少阿片类药物的使用,并在不使用阿片类药物的情况下产生更好的临床效果。

Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Reduces Opioid Use and Results in Superior Clinical Outcomes When Used Without Opioids.

机构信息

Albany Medical Center Department of Neuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, Albany, New York.

Department of Neurosurgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):217-226. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy065.

DOI:10.1093/neuros/nyy065
PMID:29538696
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain causes a significant burden to the US health care system, is difficult to treat, and remains a significant contributor to increased opioid use in the United States. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been FDA approved for the treatment of chronic pain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the hypothesis that SCS reduces opioid use, and alone maintains clinical outcome measures of pain and psychosocial determinants of health.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 86 patients undergoing SCS surgery for the treatment of chronic pain between September 2012 and August 2015. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). VAS scores were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients used opioids before SCS implantation. The 33 nonusers had lower mean VAS, NRS, and ODI scores than both opioid groups at 1 yr and improved significantly at 1 yr on the VAS (P < .001), NRS (P < .001), MPQ (P = .002), PCS (P < .001), BDI (P = .04), and ODI (P = .002). After surgery, 41.5% remained opioids and 58.5% reduced/eliminated use. Discontinued (n = 29) or reduced (n = 2) use resulted in VAS, NRS, total MPQ, and ODI score reduction (P < .001, P = .002, P = .002, and P = .009 respectively). At 1 yr, survey scores in opioid users were unchanged. There was no difference between groups in revision or failure rates.

CONCLUSION

Sixty-four percent of patients who were using opioids prior to SCS reduced (n = 2) or eliminated opioid use (n = 29) at 1 yr postoperatively. Patients who eliminated opioid use or never used opioids had superior clinical outcomes to those who continued use.

摘要

背景

慢性疼痛给美国医疗保健系统带来了巨大负担,难以治疗,并且仍然是美国阿片类药物使用增加的一个重要原因。脊髓刺激(SCS)已获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准,用于治疗慢性疼痛。

目的

评估 SCS 可减少阿片类药物使用的假设,并单独维持疼痛的临床疗效指标和健康的心理社会决定因素。

方法

在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们评估了 2012 年 9 月至 2015 年 8 月期间接受 SCS 手术治疗慢性疼痛的 86 名患者。在术前和术后,患者完成了数字评分量表(NRS)、麦吉尔疼痛问卷(MPQ)、疼痛灾难化量表(PCS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)和贝克抑郁量表(BDI)。回顾性分析 VAS 评分。

结果

53 名患者在 SCS 植入前使用阿片类药物。33 名非使用者在 1 年时的 VAS、NRS 和 ODI 评分均低于两组阿片类药物使用者,并且在 VAS(P<.001)、NRS(P<.001)、MPQ(P=0.002)、PCS(P<.001)、BDI(P=0.04)和 ODI(P=0.002)方面均显著改善。手术后,41.5%的患者继续使用阿片类药物,58.5%的患者减少/消除了使用。停止(n=29)或减少(n=2)使用导致 VAS、NRS、总 MPQ 和 ODI 评分降低(P<.001,P=0.002,P=0.002,P=0.009)。在 1 年时,阿片类药物使用者的调查评分没有变化。在翻修或失败率方面,两组之间没有差异。

结论

在 SCS 之前使用阿片类药物的 64%的患者在术后 1 年内减少(n=2)或消除(n=29)阿片类药物使用。消除阿片类药物使用或从未使用过阿片类药物的患者的临床结果优于继续使用阿片类药物的患者。

相似文献

1
Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Reduces Opioid Use and Results in Superior Clinical Outcomes When Used Without Opioids.脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛可减少阿片类药物的使用,并在不使用阿片类药物的情况下产生更好的临床效果。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):217-226. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy065.
2
Age as an Independent Predictor of Adult Spinal Cord Stimulation Pain Outcomes.年龄是成人脊髓刺激疼痛结果的独立预测因素。
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2022;100(1):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000517426. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
3
Use of a Psychological Evaluation Tool as a Predictor of Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes.使用心理评估工具作为脊髓刺激结果的预测指标。
Neuromodulation. 2019 Feb;22(2):194-199. doi: 10.1111/ner.12884. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
4
Pain and Interoceptive Awareness Outcomes of Chronic Pain Patients With Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗慢性疼痛患者的疼痛和内脏感知结果。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Dec;24(8):1357-1362. doi: 10.1111/ner.13318. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
5
Spinal Cord Stimulation to Treat Low Back Pain in Patients With and Without Previous Spine Surgery.脊髓刺激治疗有和无既往脊柱手术史患者的腰痛。
Neuromodulation. 2021 Dec;24(8):1363-1369. doi: 10.1111/ner.13333. Epub 2020 Dec 14.
6
Comparison of the Efficacy of a Gabapentinoid with an Opioid Versus an Opioid Alone in Patients with Spinal Cord Stimulation.比较加巴喷丁类药物联合阿片类药物与单纯阿片类药物治疗脊髓刺激患者的疗效。
Pain Physician. 2018 Jul;21(4):E429-E434.
7
Intraoperative Neuromonitoring in Percutaneous Spinal Cord Stimulator Placement.经皮脊髓刺激器植入术中的神经监测
Neuromodulation. 2019 Apr;22(3):341-346. doi: 10.1111/ner.12886. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
8
Duloxetine Improves Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcomes for Chronic Pain.度洛西汀可改善慢性疼痛的脊髓刺激治疗效果。
Neuromodulation. 2019 Feb;22(2):215-218. doi: 10.1111/ner.12872. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Pain Remission at One-Year Follow-Up With Spinal Cord Stimulation.脊髓刺激治疗一年随访时的疼痛缓解情况
Neuromodulation. 2018 Jan;21(1):101-105. doi: 10.1111/ner.12711. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
10
Spinal Cord Stimulation Provides Pain Relief with Improved Psychosocial Function: Results from EMP3OWER.脊髓刺激可缓解疼痛并改善心理社会功能:EMP3OWER研究结果
Pain Med. 2016 Dec;17(12):2311-2325. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw152. Epub 2016 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning predicts spinal cord stimulation surgery outcomes and reveals novel neural markers for chronic pain.机器学习可预测脊髓刺激手术的结果,并揭示慢性疼痛的新型神经标志物。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 18;15(1):9279. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92111-8.
2
Spinal cord stimulation may reduce lumbar radiculopathy in the setting of metastatic colon cancer.脊髓刺激可能会减轻转移性结肠癌患者的腰椎神经根病。
Interv Pain Med. 2023 Dec 15;2(4):100374. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100374. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
The impact of spinal cord stimulation on opioid utilization in failed back surgery syndrome and spinal surgery naïve patients.
脊髓刺激对腰椎手术失败综合征患者和未接受过脊柱手术患者阿片类药物使用的影响。
Interv Pain Med. 2022 Oct 7;1(4):100148. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100148. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Pain medication tapering for patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II, treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A RCT-study protocol of the PIANISSIMO study.脊髓刺激治疗慢性脊柱疼痛综合征 II 型患者的疼痛药物逐渐减量:PIANISSIMO 研究的 RCT 研究方案。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 12;19(8):e0302842. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302842. eCollection 2024.
5
Research hotspots and trends on spinal cord stimulation for pain treatment: a two-decade bibliometric analysis.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛的研究热点与趋势:一项二十年的文献计量分析
Front Neurosci. 2023 May 25;17:1158712. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1158712. eCollection 2023.
6
A case series of new radicular pain following the insertion of spinal cord stimulator.一组脊髓刺激器植入后新发神经根性疼痛的病例系列
Br J Pain. 2022 Aug;16(4):450-457. doi: 10.1177/20494637221084187. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
7
Efficacy of interventions to reduce long term opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.干预措施减少慢性非癌痛长期阿片类药物治疗的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Apr 4;377:e066375. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066375.
8
Spinal Cord Stimulation as Treatment for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Pain.脊髓刺激作为癌症和化疗引起疼痛的治疗方法。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2021 Aug 24;2:699993. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2021.699993. eCollection 2021.
9
Clinical Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation According to Pain Characteristics.根据疼痛特征进行脊髓刺激后的临床结果
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 Mar;65(2):276-286. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0145. Epub 2022 Jan 4.
10
Decreased Opioid Consumption and Durable Pain Relief in Patients Treated with 10 kHz SCS: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes from Single-Center.10kHz脊髓刺激疗法治疗患者的阿片类药物消耗量减少及持久疼痛缓解:单中心结局的回顾性分析
J Pain Res. 2021 Aug 24;14:2593-2600. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S312932. eCollection 2021.