Universidad Internacional de La Rioja, Almansa 101, 28040, Madrid, Spain.
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 14;18(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1145-y.
Most scholars agree that empathy is one of the keys for medical education, but it is not yet clear precisely how this term should be defined. Currently, the predominant tendency in this area consists in considering empathy within the context of narrative medicine or, more specifically, within the interaction theory instead of the simulation theory of empathy. A significant development of the interaction theory is "second-order empathy". After describing the outlines of this kind of empathy, I suggest that the practitioner should also inquire about the patient's certainties - in Wittgenstein's sense - in order the better to enrich and understand her narrative. Besides offering examples of how certainties may contribute to reaching a clearer perspective of the patient's narratives and, thus, to strengthen second-order empathy with her, guidelines are provided to train medical students in identifying such certainties.
大多数学者都认为同理心是医学教育的关键之一,但目前还不清楚这个术语的确切定义。目前,这一领域的主要趋势是将同理心置于叙事医学的背景下,或者更具体地说,置于同理心的互动理论而不是模拟理论中。同理心互动理论的一个重要发展是“二阶同理心”。在描述了这种同理心的大致轮廓之后,我建议从业者还应该询问患者的确定性——在维特根斯坦的意义上——以便更好地丰富和理解她的叙述。除了提供一些例子来说明确定性如何有助于更清楚地了解患者的叙述,并因此加强与她的二阶同理心之外,还提供了一些指导方针,以培训医学生识别这种确定性。