• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1996 - 2013年英国国家癌症政策对癌症生存率趋势及社会经济不平等的影响:基于人群的研究

Impact of national cancer policies on cancer survival trends and socioeconomic inequalities in England, 1996-2013: population based study.

作者信息

Exarchakou Aimilia, Rachet Bernard, Belot Aurélien, Maringe Camille, Coleman Michel P

机构信息

Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK

Cancer Survival Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

出版信息

BMJ. 2018 Mar 14;360:k764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k764.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.k764
PMID:29540358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5850596/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of the NHS Cancer Plan (2000) and subsequent national cancer policy initiatives in improving cancer survival and reducing socioeconomic inequalities in survival in England.

DESIGN

Population based cohort study.

SETTING

England.

POPULATION

More than 3.5 million registered patients aged 15-99 with a diagnosis of one of the 24 most common primary, malignant, invasive neoplasms between 1996 and 2013.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Age standardised net survival estimates by cancer, sex, year, and deprivation group. These estimates were modelled using regression model with splines to explore changes in the cancer survival trends and in the socioeconomic inequalities in survival.

RESULTS

One year net survival improved steadily from 1996 for 26 of 41 sex-cancer combinations studied, and only from 2001 or 2006 for four cancers. Trends in survival accelerated after 2006 for five cancers. The deprivation gap observed for all 41 sex-cancer combinations among patients with a diagnosis in 1996 persisted until 2013. However, the gap slightly decreased for six cancers among men for which one year survival was more than 65% in 1996, and for cervical and uterine cancers, for which survival was more than 75% in 1996. The deprivation gap widened notably for brain tumours in men and for lung cancer in women.

CONCLUSIONS

Little evidence was found of a direct impact of national cancer strategies on one year survival, and no evidence for a reduction in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival. These findings emphasise that socioeconomic inequalities in survival remain a major public health problem for a healthcare system founded on equity.

摘要

目的

评估英国国民医疗服务体系癌症计划(2000年)及随后的国家癌症政策举措在提高英格兰癌症生存率和减少生存方面的社会经济不平等方面的有效性。

设计

基于人群的队列研究。

背景

英格兰。

研究对象

1996年至2013年间超过350万年龄在15 - 99岁之间、被诊断患有24种最常见原发性恶性侵袭性肿瘤之一的注册患者。

主要观察指标

按癌症、性别、年份和贫困组划分的年龄标准化净生存估计值。这些估计值使用带样条的回归模型进行建模,以探讨癌症生存趋势和生存方面的社会经济不平等的变化。

结果

在所研究的41种性别 - 癌症组合中,有26种组合的一年净生存率自1996年起稳步提高,另外4种癌症仅从2001年或2006年起生存率有所提高。2006年后,有5种癌症的生存趋势加速。1996年确诊的所有41种性别 - 癌症组合患者中观察到的贫困差距一直持续到2013年。然而,对于1996年一年生存率超过65%的男性中的6种癌症,以及1996年生存率超过75%的宫颈癌和子宫癌,贫困差距略有缩小。男性脑肿瘤和女性肺癌的贫困差距显著扩大。

结论

几乎没有证据表明国家癌症战略对一年生存率有直接影响,也没有证据表明癌症生存方面的社会经济不平等有所减少。这些发现强调,对于一个建立在公平基础上的医疗体系而言,生存方面的社会经济不平等仍然是一个主要的公共卫生问题。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4837/5850596/a2156846092c/exaa041569.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4837/5850596/cf83d846fff0/exaa041569.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4837/5850596/c9f85ea74377/exaa041569.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4837/5850596/a2156846092c/exaa041569.f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4837/5850596/cf83d846fff0/exaa041569.f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4837/5850596/c9f85ea74377/exaa041569.f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4837/5850596/a2156846092c/exaa041569.f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of national cancer policies on cancer survival trends and socioeconomic inequalities in England, 1996-2013: population based study.1996 - 2013年英国国家癌症政策对癌症生存率趋势及社会经济不平等的影响:基于人群的研究
BMJ. 2018 Mar 14;360:k764. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k764.
2
Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England after the NHS cancer plan.英国国民保健制度癌症计划后癌症生存的社会经济不平等
Br J Cancer. 2010 Aug 10;103(4):446-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605752. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
3
The impact of age at diagnosis on socioeconomic inequalities in adult cancer survival in England.诊断年龄对英格兰成年癌症患者生存的社会经济不平等的影响。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;39(4):641-9. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
4
Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival: a population-based study of adult patients diagnosed in Osaka, Japan, during the period 1993-2004.癌症生存方面的社会经济不平等:一项基于日本大阪1993 - 2004年期间确诊的成年患者的人群研究。
Acta Oncol. 2014 Oct;53(10):1423-33. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.912350. Epub 2014 May 28.
5
40-year trends in an index of survival for all cancers combined and survival adjusted for age and sex for each cancer in England and Wales, 1971-2011: a population-based study.英格兰和威尔士 1971-2011 年所有癌症综合生存率及各癌龄性调整生存率指数 40 年变化趋势:基于人群的研究。
Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1206-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61396-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士癌症生存率方面的社会经济不平等现象。
Cancer. 2001 Jan 1;91(1 Suppl):208-16. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010101)91:1+<208::aid-cncr6>3.0.co;2-e.
7
Inequalities in cancer survival: Spearhead Primary Care Trusts are appropriate geographic units of analyses.癌症生存率的不平等:先锋初级保健信托基金是合适的地理分析单位。
Health Stat Q. 2010 Winter(48):81-90. doi: 10.1057/hsq.2010.22.
8
Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in Scotland 1986-2000.1986 - 2000年苏格兰癌症生存率的社会经济不平等状况。
Br J Cancer. 2007 Oct 8;97(7):999-1004. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603980. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
9
Trends and socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in England and Wales up to 2001.截至2001年英格兰和威尔士癌症生存率的趋势及社会经济不平等情况。
Br J Cancer. 2004 Apr 5;90(7):1367-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601696.
10
Geographical variation in cancer survival in England, 1991-2006: an analysis by Cancer Network.英格兰癌症存活率的地域差异,1991-2006:癌症网络分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 Nov;65(11):1044-52. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.126656. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgery or radiotherapy for early-stage cancer study (SORT) target trial protocol: stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) with curative intent versus surgical resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).早期癌症手术或放疗研究(SORT)目标试验方案:根治性立体定向消融放疗(SABR)与早期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)手术切除的对比
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 13;15(7):e103038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103038.
2
Systematic mapping review of statistical methods applied to the relationships between cancer diagnosis and geographical level factors in UK.对应用于英国癌症诊断与地理层面因素之间关系的统计方法的系统映射综述。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 6;15(7):e098379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098379.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Do pre-diagnosis primary care consultation patterns explain deprivation-specific differences in net survival among women with breast cancer? An examination of individually-linked data from the UK West Midlands cancer registry, national screening programme and Clinical Practice Research Datalink.诊断前的初级保健咨询模式能否解释乳腺癌女性患者净生存率的贫困特异性差异?对来自英国西米德兰兹癌症登记处、国家筛查计划和临床实践研究数据链的个体关联数据的一项研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Feb 23;17(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3129-4.
2
Analysing population-based cancer survival - settling the controversies.分析基于人群的癌症生存率——解决争议
BMC Cancer. 2016 Dec 3;16(1):933. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2967-9.
3
Characteristics of interventions aimed at reducing inequalities along the cancer continuum: A scoping review.
旨在减少癌症连续过程中不平等现象的干预措施的特征:一项范围综述。
Int J Cancer. 2025 Sep 15;157(6):1043-1054. doi: 10.1002/ijc.35478. Epub 2025 May 26.
4
Use of mortality tables by level of deprivation in the study of social inequalities in cancer survival.在癌症生存社会不平等研究中按贫困程度使用死亡率表。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;40(2):213-223. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01199-1. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
5
COVID-19 and cancer in the UK: which will prove to be the lesser of two evils?英国的新冠疫情与癌症:哪一个会被证明是两害相权中的较轻者?
BMJ Oncol. 2023 Jan 31;2(1):e000012. doi: 10.1136/bmjonc-2022-000012. eCollection 2023.
6
Syndemic geographic patterns of cancer risk in a health-deprived area of England.英国一个健康匮乏地区癌症风险的共病地理模式。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2024 Oct 25;8:100552. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2024.100552. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with S‑1 as a third‑ or later‑line treatment for advanced non‑small cell lung cancer in China: A systematic review and meta‑analysis.安罗替尼联合S-1作为中国晚期非小细胞肺癌三线及以上治疗的疗效和安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Oncol Lett. 2024 Oct 14;28(6):613. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14746. eCollection 2024 Dec.
8
Latent Archetypes of the Spatial Patterns of Cancer.癌症空间模式的潜在原型。
Stat Med. 2024 Nov 30;43(27):5115-5137. doi: 10.1002/sim.10232. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
9
Looking Back, Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control.回顾过去,展望未来:全球宫颈癌预防与控制的挑战与机遇。
Viruses. 2024 Aug 25;16(9):1357. doi: 10.3390/v16091357.
10
Disparities in Overall Survival Rates for Cancers across Income Levels in the Republic of Korea.韩国不同收入水平人群癌症总体生存率的差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;16(16):2923. doi: 10.3390/cancers16162923.
Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study.
宫颈筛查对宫颈癌死亡率的影响:利用巢式病例对照研究的特定分期结果进行估计
Br J Cancer. 2016 Oct 25;115(9):1140-1146. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.290. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
4
Do colorectal cancer patients diagnosed as an emergency differ from non-emergency patients in their consultation patterns and symptoms? A longitudinal data-linkage study in England.急诊确诊的结直肠癌患者与非急诊患者在就诊模式和症状方面是否存在差异?英国的一项纵向数据关联研究。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Sep 27;115(7):866-75. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.250. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
5
Is cancer survival associated with cancer symptom awareness and barriers to seeking medical help in England? An ecological study.在英国,癌症生存率与癌症症状认知及寻求医疗帮助的障碍有关吗?一项生态学研究。
Br J Cancer. 2016 Sep 27;115(7):876-86. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.246. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
6
How much do tumor stage and treatment explain socioeconomic inequalities in breast cancer survival? Applying causal mediation analysis to population-based data.肿瘤分期和治疗在多大程度上解释了乳腺癌生存方面的社会经济不平等?将因果中介分析应用于基于人群的数据。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2016 Jun;31(6):603-11. doi: 10.1007/s10654-016-0155-5. Epub 2016 May 10.
7
Multivariable flexible modelling for estimating complete, smoothed life tables for sub-national populations.用于估计次国家级人群完整、平滑生命表的多变量灵活建模。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 16;15:1240. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2534-3.
8
Impact of deprivation on breast cancer survival among women eligible for mammographic screening in the West Midlands (UK) and New South Wales (Australia): Women diagnosed 1997-2006.贫困对英国西米德兰兹郡和澳大利亚新南威尔士州符合乳房X光筛查条件的女性乳腺癌生存率的影响:1997年至2006年确诊的女性
Int J Cancer. 2016 May 15;138(10):2396-403. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29983. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
9
Is England closing the international gap in cancer survival?英国正在缩小癌症生存率方面的国际差距吗?
Br J Cancer. 2015 Sep 1;113(5):848-60. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.265. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
10
40-year trends in an index of survival for all cancers combined and survival adjusted for age and sex for each cancer in England and Wales, 1971-2011: a population-based study.英格兰和威尔士 1971-2011 年所有癌症综合生存率及各癌龄性调整生存率指数 40 年变化趋势:基于人群的研究。
Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1206-18. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61396-9. Epub 2014 Dec 3.