Leifeld J, Menichetti L
Agroscope, Climate and Agriculture Group, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.
Now Ecology, SLU (Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet), Ulls Väg 16, 75651, Uppsala, Sweden.
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 14;9(1):1071. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03406-6.
Soil carbon sequestration and avoidable emissions through peatland restoration are both strategies to tackle climate change. Here we compare their potential and environmental costs regarding nitrogen and land demand. In the event that no further areas are exploited, drained peatlands will cumulatively release 80.8 Gt carbon and 2.3 Gt nitrogen. This corresponds to a contemporary annual greenhouse gas emission of 1.91 (0.31-3.38) Gt CO-eq. that could be saved with peatland restoration. Soil carbon sequestration on all agricultural land has comparable mitigation potential. However, additional nitrogen is needed to build up a similar carbon pool in organic matter of mineral soils, equivalent to 30-80% of the global fertilizer nitrogen application annually. Restoring peatlands is 3.4 times less nitrogen costly and involves a much smaller land area demand than mineral soil carbon sequestration, calling for a stronger consideration of peatland rehabilitation as a mitigation measure.
通过泥炭地恢复实现土壤碳固存和避免排放都是应对气候变化的策略。在此,我们比较了它们在氮和土地需求方面的潜力及环境成本。如果不再开发更多区域,排水后的泥炭地将累计释放80.8亿吨碳和2.3亿吨氮。这相当于当代每年可通过泥炭地恢复节省1.91(0.31 - 3.38)亿吨二氧化碳当量的温室气体排放。所有农业土地上的土壤碳固存具有类似的减排潜力。然而,要在矿质土壤的有机质中建立类似的碳库需要额外的氮,这相当于全球每年化肥氮施用量的30% - 80%。恢复泥炭地的氮成本低3.4倍,且所需土地面积比矿质土壤碳固存小得多,因此需要更加强烈地考虑将泥炭地恢复作为一种减排措施。