• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰泥炭地的沼地农业作为沼地未来:香蒲种植和隔热材料生产的环境和经济分析。

Paludiculture as paludifuture on Dutch peatlands: An environmental and economic analysis of Typha cultivation and insulation production.

机构信息

Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ Bunnik, the Netherlands; Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, Vening Meinesz Building A, Princetonlaan 8a, 3584 CB Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Louis Bolk Institute, Kosterijland 3-5, 3981 AJ Bunnik, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 20;792:148161. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148161. Epub 2021 May 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148161
PMID:34465063
Abstract

Paludiculture, the cultivation of crops on rewetted peatlands, is often proposed as a viable climate change mitigation option that reduces greenhouse gas emissions (GHGe), while simultaneously providing novel agricultural business options. In West Europe, experiments are ongoing in using the paludicrop cattail (Typha spp.) as feedstock for insulation panel material. Here, we use a Dutch case study to investigate the environmental potential and economic viability of shifting the use of peat soils from grassland (for dairy production) to Typha paludiculture (for cultivation and insulation panel production). Using a life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis, we compared the global warming potential (GWP), yearly revenues and calculated Net Present Value (NPV) of 1 ha Dutch peat soil used either for dairy production or for Typha paludiculture. We estimated that changing to Typha paludiculture leads to a GWP reduction of ~32% (16.4 t CO-eq ha), mainly because of lower emissions from peat decomposition as a result of land-use management (-21.6 t CO-eq ha). If biogenic carbon storage is excluded, the avoided impact of conventional insulation material is insufficient to compensate the impact of cultivating and processing Typha (9.7 t CO-eq ha); however, this changes if biogenic carbon storage is included (following PAS2050 guidelines). Typha paludiculture is currently not competitive with dairy production, mainly due to high cultivation costs and low revenues, which are both uncertain, and will likely improve as the system develops. Its NPV is negative, mainly due to high investment costs. This can be improved by introducing carbon credits, with carbon prices for Typha paludiculture (30 years) comparable to EU-ETS prices. In conclusion, Dutch Typha paludiculture has a significant climate change mitigation potential by reducing emissions from deep drained peatlands. Nevertheless, attention is needed to increase its economic viability as this is a key aspect of the system change.

摘要

湿地农业,即在回灌的泥炭地上种植作物,通常被认为是一种可行的气候变化缓解选择,它可以减少温室气体排放(GHGe),同时提供新的农业商业选择。在西欧,正在进行利用湿地作物香蒲(Typha spp.)作为绝缘板材料原料的实验。在这里,我们使用荷兰的案例研究来调查将泥炭土的用途从草地(用于奶牛养殖)转变为香蒲湿地农业(用于种植和绝缘板生产)的环境潜力和经济可行性。我们使用生命周期评估和成本效益分析,比较了 1 公顷荷兰泥炭土用于奶牛养殖或香蒲湿地农业的全球变暖潜力(GWP)、年收益和净现值(NPV)。我们估计,转向香蒲湿地农业会导致 GWP 减少约 32%(16.4 吨 CO2-eq 公顷),主要是由于土地利用管理减少了泥炭分解的排放(-21.6 吨 CO2-eq 公顷)。如果排除生物碳储存,避免使用传统绝缘材料的影响不足以补偿种植和加工香蒲的影响(9.7 吨 CO2-eq 公顷);然而,如果包括生物碳储存(按照 PAS2050 指南),情况就会改变。香蒲湿地农业目前与奶牛养殖相比不具有竞争力,主要是由于高种植成本和低收益,这两个因素都是不确定的,并且随着系统的发展,它们可能会提高。它的 NPV 是负数,主要是由于高投资成本。通过引入碳信用额,可以改善这种情况,香蒲湿地农业的碳价格(30 年)与欧盟排放交易体系的价格相当。总之,荷兰的香蒲湿地农业通过减少深排水泥炭地的排放具有显著的气候变化缓解潜力。然而,需要注意的是,需要提高其经济可行性,因为这是系统变革的关键方面。

相似文献

1
Paludiculture as paludifuture on Dutch peatlands: An environmental and economic analysis of Typha cultivation and insulation production.荷兰泥炭地的沼地农业作为沼地未来:香蒲种植和隔热材料生产的环境和经济分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 20;792:148161. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148161. Epub 2021 May 31.
2
The greenhouse gas emission effects of rewetting drained peatlands and growing wetland plants for biogas fuel production.湿地排干再补水和种植湿地植物生产沼气燃料的温室气体排放效应。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:111391. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111391. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
3
Full-cycle greenhouse gas balance of a Sphagnum paludiculture site on former bog grassland in Germany.德国前泥炭草地沼泽地栽培泥炭藓的全生命周期温室气体平衡。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 15;877:162943. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162943. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
4
Nutrient removal potential and biomass production by Phragmites australis and Typha latifolia on European rewetted peat and mineral soils.芦苇和香蒲对欧洲回灌泥炭和矿质土壤的养分去除潜力和生物量生产。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Dec 10;747:141102. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141102. Epub 2020 Jul 24.
5
Production in peatlands: Comparing ecosystem services of different land use options following conventional farming.泥炭地的生产:比较传统农业后不同土地利用方式的生态系统服务。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 1;875:162534. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162534. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
6
Responsible agriculture must adapt to the wetland character of mid-latitude peatlands.负责任的农业必须适应中纬度泥炭地的湿地特性。
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jun;28(12):3795-3811. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16152. Epub 2022 Mar 17.
7
Paludiculture as a sustainable land use alternative for tropical peatlands: A review.湿地农业作为热带泥炭地可持续土地利用的替代选择:综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Jan 20;753:142111. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142111. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
8
Land use of drained peatlands: Greenhouse gas fluxes, plant production, and economics.排水泥炭地的土地利用:温室气体通量、植物生产力和经济学。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Aug;24(8):3302-3316. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13931. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
9
Impact of fertiliser, water table, and warming on celery yield and CO and CH emissions from fenland agricultural peat.施肥、地下水位和增温对沼泽农田芹菜产量和 CO 及 CH 排放的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 1;667:179-190. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.360. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
10
Paludiculture can support biodiversity conservation in rewetted fen peatlands.湿地农业可以支持重新浸水的泥炭沼泽湿地的生物多样性保护。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 23;13(1):18091. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44481-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Peatland restoration pathways to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions and retain peat carbon.泥炭地恢复途径以减轻温室气体排放并保留泥炭碳。
Biogeochemistry. 2024;167(4):523-543. doi: 10.1007/s10533-023-01103-1. Epub 2023 Dec 8.