Departments of Pathology, Immunology, and Laboratory Medicine, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 14;8(1):4529. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22574-5.
Prior studies identified HLA class-II and 57 additional loci as contributors to genetic susceptibility for type 1 diabetes (T1D). We hypothesized that race and/or ethnicity would be contextually important for evaluating genetic risk markers previously identified from Caucasian/European cohorts. We determined the capacity for a combined genetic risk score (GRS) to discriminate disease-risk subgroups in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort from the southeastern U.S. including 637 T1D patients, 46 at-risk relatives having two or more T1D-related autoantibodies (≥2AAb), 790 first-degree relatives (≤1AAb), 68 second-degree relatives (≤1 AAb), and 405 controls. GRS was higher among Caucasian T1D and at-risk subjects versus ≤ 1AAb relatives or controls (P < 0.001). GRS receiver operating characteristic AUC (AUROC) for T1D versus controls was 0.86 (P < 0.001, specificity = 73.9%, sensitivity = 83.3%) among all Caucasian subjects and 0.90 for Hispanic Caucasians (P < 0.001, specificity = 86.5%, sensitivity = 84.4%). Age-at-diagnosis negatively correlated with GRS (P < 0.001) and associated with HLA-DR3/DR4 diplotype. Conversely, GRS was less robust (AUROC = 0.75) and did not correlate with age-of-diagnosis for African Americans. Our findings confirm GRS should be further used in Caucasian populations to assign T1D risk for clinical trials designed for biomarker identification and development of personalized treatment strategies. We also highlight the need to develop a GRS model that accommodates racial diversity.
先前的研究已经确定了 HLA 类 II 基因和 57 个其他基因座是 1 型糖尿病(T1D)遗传易感性的因素。我们假设,种族和/或民族对于评估先前从白种人/欧洲队列中确定的遗传风险标志物是非常重要的。我们确定了一个综合遗传风险评分(GRS)在包括美国东南部的 637 名 T1D 患者、46 名有两个或更多 T1D 相关自身抗体(≥2AAb)的风险亲属、790 名一级亲属(≤1AAb)、68 名二级亲属(≤1AAb)和 405 名对照者在内的种族和民族多样化队列中,区分疾病风险亚组的能力。与≤1AAb 亲属或对照者相比,白种人 T1D 和有风险的受试者的 GRS 更高(P<0.001)。在所有白种人受试者中,T1D 与对照者的 GRS 接收者操作特征曲线 AUC(AUROC)为 0.86(P<0.001,特异性为 73.9%,敏感性为 83.3%),而西班牙裔白种人的 AUROC 为 0.90(P<0.001,特异性为 86.5%,敏感性为 84.4%)。诊断时的年龄与 GRS 呈负相关(P<0.001),并与 HLA-DR3/DR4 二倍型相关。相反,GRS 在非裔美国人中不太稳健(AUROC=0.75),与诊断年龄无关。我们的研究结果证实,GRS 应该在白种人群中进一步用于确定 T1D 风险,以便为用于鉴定生物标志物和开发个性化治疗策略的临床试验提供参考。我们还强调需要开发一个适应种族多样性的 GRS 模型。