• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1型糖尿病风险筛查核心结局集的制定方案。

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for type 1 diabetes risk screening.

作者信息

Chen Celine, Luca Stephanie, Hansen Abigail, Wherrett Diane K, Witteman Holly O, Chakraborty Pranesh, L'Espérance Audrey, Wilson Michael G, McGavock Jonathan, Delorme Sasha, Hayeems Robin Z

机构信息

Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e099537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099537.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099537
PMID:40484422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12161329/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Type 1 diabetes is a chronic autoimmune disease that often presents with diabetic ketoacidosis at diagnosis. Since detection of type 1 diabetes risk is possible using genetic risk scores and autoantibody assays, prevention of diabetic ketoacidosis or delayed onset of type 1 diabetes may be possible and may improve outcomes. Several pilot screening programmes for type 1 diabetes risk have emerged worldwide but outcomes measured in these screening programmes are heterogeneous, making it difficult to compare and synthesise findings across studies. To improve the standardisation of outcome reporting and measurement, we aim to develop a patient-oriented core outcome set for studies of type 1 diabetes risk screening.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This five-step protocol was developed in alignment with the COS-STAndardised Protocol Statement and the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials framework. The five steps will include: (1a) conducting a rapid literature review, (1b) gathering input on candidate outcomes from members of the public, (2) combining literature and public input to prepare a preliminary list of outcomes, (3) conducting Delphi surveys with a range of stakeholders to begin to establish consensus on outcomes, (4) holding a final consensus meeting to establish consensus on outcomes and (5) establishing the outcome measurement instruments for the core outcome set.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval has been provided by The Hospital for Sick Children Research Ethics Board. The core outcome set will be distributed to researchers and clinicians involved in diabetes screening and clinical care, patient and family networks, research funders, journal editors, public health experts, and policymakers. Disseminated materials will be tailored to the various end users in the form of publication through academic journals, policy briefs, conferences, educational webinars, websites and social media.

摘要

引言

1型糖尿病是一种慢性自身免疫性疾病,诊断时常常伴有糖尿病酮症酸中毒。由于使用遗传风险评分和自身抗体检测能够检测1型糖尿病风险,预防糖尿病酮症酸中毒或延缓1型糖尿病发病或许可行,且可能改善预后。全球已出现了多项针对1型糖尿病风险的试点筛查项目,但这些筛查项目所测量的结果具有异质性,使得跨研究比较和综合研究结果变得困难。为提高结果报告和测量的标准化程度,我们旨在为1型糖尿病风险筛查研究制定一套以患者为导向的核心结局集。

方法与分析

本五步方案是依据《COS标准化方案声明》和《有效性试验核心结局指标》框架制定的。这五个步骤将包括:(1a)进行快速文献综述,(1b)收集公众对候选结局的意见,(2)结合文献和公众意见编制初步结局清单,(3)与一系列利益相关者进行德尔菲调查,以开始就结局达成共识,(4)召开最终共识会议以就结局达成共识,(5)为核心结局集确定结局测量工具。

伦理与传播

已获得病童医院研究伦理委员会的伦理批准。核心结局集将分发给参与糖尿病筛查和临床护理的研究人员和临床医生、患者及家庭网络、研究资助者、期刊编辑、公共卫生专家和政策制定者。传播材料将根据不同终端用户的需求进行定制,以学术期刊发表、政策简报、会议、教育网络研讨会、网站和社交媒体等形式呈现。

相似文献

1
Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for type 1 diabetes risk screening.1型糖尿病风险筛查核心结局集的制定方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 8;15(6):e099537. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099537.
2
Core Outcome Set Development for Tension-Type Headache Treatment Using Traditional Chinese Medicine: Protocol for a Delphi Consensus Study.基于中医的紧张型头痛治疗核心结局集的制定:德尔菲共识研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 5;14:e63481. doi: 10.2196/63481.
3
NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.美国国立卫生研究院关于丙型肝炎管理的共识声明:2002年。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(3):1-46.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol.为轻度认知障碍患者的干预措施制定核心结局集:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 20;15(1):e090818. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090818.
6
Effects of educational and psychosocial interventions for adolescents with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review.针对青少年糖尿病患者的教育和心理社会干预措施的效果:一项系统评价
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(10):1-79. doi: 10.3310/hta5100.
7
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening.针对女性的干预措施,以鼓励她们接受宫颈癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 6;9(9):CD002834. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub3.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Transition of care for adolescents from paediatric services to adult health services.青少年医疗护理从儿科服务向成人健康服务的过渡。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 29;4(4):CD009794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009794.pub2.
10
Psychological and/or educational interventions for the prevention of depression in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理和/或教育干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD003380. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003380.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of core outcomes reported in boys and men with Klinefelter syndrome.对克兰费尔特综合征男性患者所报告的核心结局的系统评价。
Endocrine. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s12020-025-04376-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientists and scientific journals should adhere to ethical standards for the use and reporting of data from Indigenous people.科学家和科学期刊应遵守使用和报告原住民数据的道德标准。
Diabetologia. 2024 Nov;67(11):2404-2407. doi: 10.1007/s00125-024-06236-y. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
Person-reported outcomes in registered randomised diabetes trials: A mapping review of constructs.注册随机糖尿病试验中的患者报告结局:构建的映射评价
Diabet Med. 2024 Sep;41(9):e15385. doi: 10.1111/dme.15385. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
3
Standardising personalised diabetes care across European health settings: A person-centred outcome set agreed in a multinational Delphi study.
标准化欧洲卫生环境下的个性化糖尿病护理:一项在多国德尔菲研究中达成的以患者为中心的结局集。
Diabet Med. 2024 May;41(5):e15259. doi: 10.1111/dme.15259. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
4
ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2022: Stages of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents.国际儿童青少年糖尿病研究学会(ISPAD)2022年临床实践共识指南:儿童和青少年1型糖尿病的分期
Pediatr Diabetes. 2022 Dec;23(8):1175-1187. doi: 10.1111/pedi.13410. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
Clinical Incidence and Characteristics of Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes in Chinese Children and Adolescents: A Nationwide Registry Study of 34 Medical Centers.中国儿童和青少年新诊断1型糖尿病的临床发病率及特征:一项34个医学中心的全国性登记研究
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 15;10:888370. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.888370. eCollection 2022.
6
Type 1 diabetes in diverse ancestries and the use of genetic risk scores.不同种族背景下的 1 型糖尿病与遗传风险评分的应用。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022 Aug;10(8):597-608. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00159-0. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
7
Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in the General Population: A Status Report and Perspective.普通人群中1型糖尿病的筛查:现状报告与展望
Diabetes. 2022 Apr 1;71(4):610-623. doi: 10.2337/dbi20-0054.
8
Heterogeneity of DKA Incidence and Age-Specific Clinical Characteristics in Children Diagnosed With Type 1 Diabetes in the TEDDY Study.在 TEDDY 研究中,诊断为 1 型糖尿病的儿童中 DKA 发病的异质性和年龄特异性临床特征。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Mar 1;45(3):624-633. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0422.
9
The participatory development of a national core set of person-centred diabetes outcome constructs for use in routine diabetes care across healthcare sectors.为跨医疗保健部门的常规糖尿病护理制定一套以患者为中心的糖尿病结局指标的国家核心集的参与式开发。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 10;7(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00309-7.
10
Core Outcome Sets for Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Phenylketonuria.中链酰基辅酶 A 脱氢酶缺乏症和苯丙酮尿症的核心结局集。
Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-037747. Epub 2021 Jul 15.