Stieger Philipp, Rana Obaida R, Saygili Erol, Zazai Haschmatulla, Rauwolf Thomas, Genz Conrad, Bali Rajen, Braun-Dullaeus Ruediger C, Said Samir M
Department of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, Magdeburg University, Magdeburg, Germany.
Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Helios St. Marienberg, Hospital Helmstedt, Helmstedt, Germany.
J Cardiol. 2018 Aug;72(2):135-139. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD) shocks can cause myocardial injury, contributing to the progression of the underlying heart disease. The aim was to evaluate whether internal electrical cardioversion (int-CV) via the ICD or conventional external CV (ext-CV) of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in heart failure (HF) patients induces myocardial injury and initiates inflammation.
A total of 115 HF patients with an ejection fraction between 20% and 45% were prospectively enrolled. Fifty-one patients were excluded due to failure of electrical CV at the first attempt as well as early relapse of AF within 8h after CV. The int-CV group consisted of 22 and the ext-CV group of 42 patients. Baseline values of high sensitive troponin T (hsTnT), interleukin (IL)-6, and C-reactive protein (CRP) did not differ significantly in both groups, whereas baseline N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) was significantly lower in the ext-CV group. Eight hours after CV, the level of hsTnT increased significantly in the int-CV group, whereas no significant change was observed in the ext-CV group. Furthermore, CV significantly increased IL-6 and CRP in the int-CV group, whereas an insignificant increase could be documented in the ext-CV group. Due to electrical CV in both groups, the NT-pro BNP levels significantly declined in approximately the same content (int-CV 29% vs. ext-CV 36%).
The significant increase in hsTnT, IL-6, and CRP in patients who underwent int-CV compared to those undergoing ext-CV may suggest that int-CV causes significant myocardial damage and induces systemic inflammation.
植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)电击可导致心肌损伤,促使基础心脏病进展。目的是评估心力衰竭(HF)患者中通过ICD进行的内部电复律(int-CV)或持续性心房颤动(AF)的传统外部电复律(ext-CV)是否会诱发心肌损伤并引发炎症。
前瞻性纳入了115例射血分数在20%至45%之间的HF患者。51例患者因首次电复律失败以及电复律后8小时内AF早期复发而被排除。int-CV组有22例患者,ext-CV组有42例患者。两组的高敏肌钙蛋白T(hsTnT)、白细胞介素(IL)-6和C反应蛋白(CRP)的基线值无显著差异,而ext-CV组的基线N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-pro BNP)显著更低。电复律8小时后,int-CV组的hsTnT水平显著升高,而ext-CV组未观察到显著变化。此外,电复律使int-CV组的IL-6和CRP显著升高,而ext-CV组仅有不显著的升高。由于两组均进行了电复律,NT-pro BNP水平以大致相同的幅度显著下降(int-CV组为29%,ext-CV组为36%)。
与接受ext-CV的患者相比,接受int-CV的患者hsTnT、IL-6和CRP显著升高,这可能表明int-CV会导致显著的心肌损伤并诱发全身炎症。