Fast Anne A, Van Reet Jennifer
University of Washington, Department of Psychology, Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98105, United States.
Providence College, Department of Psychology, One Cunningham Square, Providence, RI 02918, United States.
Cogn Dev. 2018 Jan-Mar;45:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Is it wrong to pretend to kick or pretend to steal? The current experiment examined whether preschoolers extend their moral principles from reality into pretense and whether this transfer depends on the proximity of the pretend world to the real world. Children are known to transfer their knowledge of object properties, causality, and problem solutions between pretend and real worlds. However, do children maintain their real-world moral reasoning in pretense? Preschoolers (N = 63) judged the acceptability of antisocial behaviors in pretend, fantastical, or non-pretend scenarios. Children found antisocial behaviors to be equally unacceptable in both pretend and non-pretend situations but found antisocial behaviors to be more acceptable in the fantastical situations. These results imply that children extend their real-world representations of morality in pretense, but more so for pretend scenarios that are similar to the real world. Implications for children's understanding of the reality-fantasy boundary and moral reasoning are discussed.
假装踢或假装偷是错误的吗?当前的实验考察了学龄前儿童是否会将他们的道德准则从现实延伸到假装情境中,以及这种转移是否取决于假装世界与现实世界的接近程度。众所周知,儿童会在假装世界和现实世界之间转移他们关于物体属性、因果关系和问题解决方法的知识。然而,儿童在假装情境中会保持他们在现实世界中的道德推理吗?学龄前儿童(N = 63)判断了在假装、奇幻或非假装情境中反社会行为的可接受性。儿童发现在假装和非假装情境中反社会行为同样不可接受,但发现在奇幻情境中反社会行为更可接受。这些结果表明,儿童在假装情境中会延伸他们在现实世界中的道德观念,但对于与现实世界相似的假装情境更是如此。本文讨论了这些结果对儿童理解现实与幻想边界以及道德推理的启示。