• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿能够区分针对公平和不公平行为主体的反社会行为。

Infants distinguish antisocial actions directed towards fair and unfair agents.

作者信息

Meristo Marek, Surian Luca

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.

Department of Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto (Trento), Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110553. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0110553
PMID:25329149
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4199735/
Abstract

Three experiments provide evidence of an incipient sense of fairness in preverbal infants. Ten-month-old infants were shown cartoon videos with two agents, the 'donors', who distributed resources to two identical recipients. One donor always distributed the goods equally, while the other performed unequal distributions by giving everything to one recipient. In the test phase, a third agent hit or took resources away from either the fair or the unfair donor. We found that infants looked longer when the antisocial actions were directed towards the unfair rather than the fair donor. These findings support the view that infants are able to evaluate agents based on their distributive actions and suggest that the foundations of human socio-moral competence are acquired independently of parental feedback and linguistic experience.

摘要

三项实验为尚不能言语的婴儿中初步的公平感提供了证据。研究人员向10个月大的婴儿展示了带有两个“捐赠者”角色的卡通视频,这两个“捐赠者”会向两个相同的接受者分配资源。其中一个捐赠者总是平均分配物品,而另一个则将所有东西都给一个接受者,进行不平等分配。在测试阶段,第三个角色会对公平或不公平的捐赠者进行击打或抢走其资源的行为。我们发现,当反社会行为针对不公平而非公平的捐赠者时,婴儿注视的时间更长。这些发现支持了这样一种观点,即婴儿能够根据其分配行为来评估角色,这表明人类社会道德能力的基础是独立于父母反馈和语言经验而获得的。

相似文献

1
Infants distinguish antisocial actions directed towards fair and unfair agents.婴儿能够区分针对公平和不公平行为主体的反社会行为。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 16;9(10):e110553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110553. eCollection 2014.
2
Toddlers' interventions toward fair and unfair individuals.幼儿对公平和不公平个体的干预。
Cognition. 2021 Sep;214:104781. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104781. Epub 2021 May 27.
3
Do infants detect indirect reciprocity?婴儿能察觉到间接互惠吗?
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):102-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
4
Do Infants Attribute Moral Traits? Fourteen-Month-Olds' Expectations of Fairness Are Affected by Agents' Antisocial Actions.婴儿会赋予道德特质吗?14个月大婴儿的公平期望受行为主体反社会行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 7;9:1649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01649. eCollection 2018.
5
Preverbal infants' reactions to third-party punishments and rewards delivered toward fair and unfair agents.婴儿对第三方对公平和不公平行为者实施的奖惩的反应。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2023 Feb;226:105574. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105574. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
6
Generalizing across moral sub-domains: infants bidirectionally link fairness and unfairness to helping and hindering.跨道德子领域进行归纳:婴儿将公平与不公平双向地与帮助和阻碍联系起来。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jul 20;14:1213409. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1213409. eCollection 2023.
7
Intention-based evaluations of distributive actions by 4-month-olds.4个月大婴儿对分配行为基于意图的评估。
Infant Behav Dev. 2023 Feb;70:101797. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2022.101797. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
8
Infants Consider the Distributor's Intentions in Resource Allocation.婴儿会考虑经销商在资源分配中的意图。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 30;11:596213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596213. eCollection 2020.
9
Infants Associate Praise and Admonishment with Fair and Unfair Individuals.婴儿将赞扬和告诫与公平和不公平的个体联系起来。
Infancy. 2016 Jul-Aug;21(4):478-504. doi: 10.1111/infa.12117. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
10
Social information affects adults' evaluation of fairness in distributions: An ERP approach.社会信息影响成年人对分配公平性的评估:一种事件相关电位研究方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172974. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the detection of parent-child relationships in early childhood: The role of partiality in resource distributions.探究幼儿期亲子关系的察觉:偏袒在资源分配中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 24;13:916266. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.916266. eCollection 2022.
2
Is Defensive Behavior a Subtype of Prosocial Behaviors?防御行为是亲社会行为的一种亚型吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 23;12:678370. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.678370. eCollection 2021.
3
Infants Consider the Distributor's Intentions in Resource Allocation.婴儿会考虑经销商在资源分配中的意图。

本文引用的文献

1
Do infants detect indirect reciprocity?婴儿能察觉到间接互惠吗?
Cognition. 2013 Oct;129(1):102-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.006. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
2
I should but I won't: why young children endorse norms of fair sharing but do not follow them.我本应但我没有:为什么年幼的孩子会认可公平分享的规范但却不遵守它们。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059510. Epub 2013 Mar 20.
3
A mutualistic approach to morality: the evolution of fairness by partner choice.互惠性道德观:通过伴侣选择进化出的公平性。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 30;11:596213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.596213. eCollection 2020.
4
Do Infants in the First Year of Life Expect Equal Resource Allocations?一岁以内的婴儿能期望得到平等的资源分配吗?
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 19;10:116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00116. eCollection 2019.
5
Do Infants Attribute Moral Traits? Fourteen-Month-Olds' Expectations of Fairness Are Affected by Agents' Antisocial Actions.婴儿会赋予道德特质吗?14个月大婴儿的公平期望受行为主体反社会行为的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 7;9:1649. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01649. eCollection 2018.
6
Infants' Understanding of Distributive Fairness as a Test Case for Identifying the Extents and Limits of Infants' Sociomoral Cognition and Behavior.婴儿对分配公平的理解作为识别婴儿社会道德认知与行为的范围及限度的一个测试案例。
Child Dev Perspect. 2018 Sep;12(3):141-145. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12283. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
7
Preschool Children Transfer Real-World Moral Reasoning into Pretense.学龄前儿童将现实世界的道德推理应用于假装情境。
Cogn Dev. 2018 Jan-Mar;45:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
8
Fairness informs social decision making in infancy.公平性影响婴儿期的社会决策。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 14;13(2):e0192848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192848. eCollection 2018.
9
Toddlers Selectively Help Fair Agents.幼儿会选择性地帮助公平的人。
Front Psychol. 2017 Jun 7;8:944. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00944. eCollection 2017.
10
Social information affects adults' evaluation of fairness in distributions: An ERP approach.社会信息影响成年人对分配公平性的评估:一种事件相关电位研究方法。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 24;12(2):e0172974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172974. eCollection 2017.
Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):59-78. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11002202.
4
The development of intent-based moral judgment.基于意图的道德判断的发展。
Cognition. 2013 Apr;127(1):6-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Jan 12.
5
Children develop a veil of fairness.儿童形成公平的面纱。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Feb;143(1):363-75. doi: 10.1037/a0031247. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
6
Young children consider merit when sharing resources with others.幼儿在与他人分享资源时会考虑优点。
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043979. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
7
Do infants have a sense of fairness?婴儿有公平感吗?
Psychol Sci. 2012 Feb;23(2):196-204. doi: 10.1177/0956797611422072. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
8
Preschoolers are able to take merit into account when distributing goods.学龄前儿童在分配物品时能够考虑到优点。
Dev Psychol. 2012 Mar;48(2):492-8. doi: 10.1037/a0026598. Epub 2011 Dec 12.
9
How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others.婴儿和幼儿对反社会者的反应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Dec 13;108(50):19931-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110306108. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
10
Fairness expectations and altruistic sharing in 15-month-old human infants.15 个月大的人类婴儿的公平期望和利他分享。
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e23223. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023223. Epub 2011 Oct 7.