• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西班牙纳瓦拉地区急救服务救治的严重创伤患者的死亡率:新预测模型的验证及与修订版创伤严重程度分类评分 II 的比较。

Mortality in severe trauma patients attended by emergency services in Navarre, Spain: validation of a new prediction model and comparison with the Revised Injury Severity Classification Score II.

机构信息

Servicio de Urgencias del Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Servicio Navarro de Salud-Osasunbidea, Pamplona, España.

Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Universidad de Witten/Herdecke, Alemania.

出版信息

Emergencias. 2018;30(2):98-104.

PMID:29547232
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To validate the Mortality Prediction Model of Navarre (MPMN) to predict death after severe trauma and compare it to the Revised Injury Severity Classification Score II (RISCII).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of a cohort of severe trauma patients (New Injury Severity Score >15) who were attended by emergency services in the Spanish autonomous community of Navarre between 2013 and 2015. The outcome variable was 30-day all-cause mortality. Risk was calculated with the MPMN and the RISCII. The performance of each model was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and precision with respect to observed mortality. Calibration was assessed with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

We included 516 patients. The mean (SD) age was 56 (23) years, and 363 (70%) were males. Ninety patients (17.4%) died within 30 days. The 30-day mortality rates predicted by the MPMN and RISCII were 16.4% and 15.4%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.925 (95% CI, 0.902-0.952) for the MPMN and 0.941 (95% CI, 0.921-0.962) for the RISCII (P=0.269, DeLong test). Calibration statistics were 13.6 (P=.09) for the MPMN and 8.9 (P=.35) for the RISCII.

CONCLUSION

Both the MPMN and the RISCII show good ability to discriminate risk and predict 30-day all-cause mortality in severe trauma patients.

摘要

目的

验证用于预测严重创伤后死亡的纳瓦雷死亡率预测模型(MPMN),并将其与修订后的损伤严重程度分类评分 II(RISCII)进行比较。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 2013 年至 2015 年期间在西班牙纳瓦拉自治区接受急诊服务的严重创伤患者(新损伤严重程度评分>15)队列。结局变量为 30 天全因死亡率。使用 MPMN 和 RISCII 计算风险。通过接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积和观察死亡率的精度来评估每个模型的性能。使用 Hosmer-Lemeshow 检验评估校准。

结果

共纳入 516 例患者。平均(SD)年龄为 56(23)岁,男性 363 例(70%)。90 例(17.4%)患者在 30 天内死亡。MPMN 和 RISCII 预测的 30 天死亡率分别为 16.4%和 15.4%。MPMN 的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.925(95%CI,0.902-0.952),RISCII 的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.941(95%CI,0.921-0.962)(P=0.269,DeLong 检验)。MPMN 的校准统计量为 13.6(P=.09),RISCII 的校准统计量为 8.9(P=.35)。

结论

MPMN 和 RISCII 均能较好地鉴别风险,预测严重创伤患者 30 天全因死亡率。

相似文献

1
Mortality in severe trauma patients attended by emergency services in Navarre, Spain: validation of a new prediction model and comparison with the Revised Injury Severity Classification Score II.西班牙纳瓦拉地区急救服务救治的严重创伤患者的死亡率:新预测模型的验证及与修订版创伤严重程度分类评分 II 的比较。
Emergencias. 2018;30(2):98-104.
2
Major trauma registry of Navarre (Spain): the accuracy of different survival prediction models.纳瓦拉重大创伤登记处(西班牙):不同生存预测模型的准确性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;31(9):1382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.026. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
3
[Inclusion of prehospital mortality statistics in severe trauma registries: a study of the influence of inclusion on trauma lethality rates and survival prediction].[将院前死亡率统计纳入严重创伤登记系统:关于纳入对创伤致死率和生存预测影响的研究]
Emergencias. 2016 Jun;28(3):173-178.
4
Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate?严重创伤后院内死亡率的预测:哪种院前评分最准确?
Injury. 2016 Jan;47(1):14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.035. Epub 2015 Oct 26.
5
Continuously recorded oxygen saturation and heart rate during prehospital transport outperform initial measurement in prediction of mortality after trauma.在创伤后,院前转运期间连续记录的氧饱和度和心率比初始测量更能预测死亡率。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Apr;72(4):1006-11. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318241c059.
6
Norwegian survival prediction model in trauma: modelling effects of anatomic injury, acute physiology, age, and co-morbidity.挪威创伤生存预测模型:解剖损伤、急性生理学、年龄及合并症的建模效应
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Mar;58(3):303-15. doi: 10.1111/aas.12256. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
7
Mortality prediction using TRISS methodology in the Spanish ICU Trauma Registry (RETRAUCI).在西班牙重症监护病房创伤登记处(RETRAUCI)中使用TRISS方法进行死亡率预测。
Med Intensiva. 2016 Oct;40(7):395-402. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2015.11.003. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
8
A comparison of the Injury Severity Score and the Trauma Mortality Prediction Model.损伤严重度评分与创伤死亡率预测模型的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jan;76(1):47-52; discussion 52-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0d5d.
9
[A new score system for prediction of death in patients with severe trauma: the value of death warning score].[一种用于预测严重创伤患者死亡的新评分系统:死亡预警评分的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Nov;27(11):890-4.
10
Predicting mortality with the international classification of disease injury severity score using survival risk ratios derived from an Indian trauma population: A cohort study.利用源自印度创伤人群的生存风险比预测国际疾病损伤严重程度评分的死亡率:一项队列研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 27;13(6):e0199754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199754. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
[Analysis of serious trauma injury patterns in Navarre (Spain) (2010-2019)].[西班牙纳瓦拉地区严重创伤损伤模式分析(2010 - 2019年)]
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2024 Aug 29;47(2):e1085. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.1085.
2
Epidemiology of severe trauma in Navarra for 10 years: out-of-hospital/ in-hospital deaths and survivors.10 年来纳瓦拉严重创伤的流行病学:院外/院内死亡和幸存者。
BMC Emerg Med. 2023 May 24;23(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00818-6.
3
Polytrauma scoring revisited: prognostic validity and usability in daily clinical practice.
再次探讨多发伤评分:在日常临床实践中的预后准确性和实用性。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Jun;50(3):649-656. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02035-5. Epub 2022 Jul 10.
4
Discrimination and calibration of a prediction model for mortality is decreased in secondary transferred patients: a validation in the TraumaRegister DGU.二次转移患者的死亡率预测模型的判别和校准能力降低:创伤登记处德国创伤学会的验证。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 13;12(4):e056381. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056381.
5
Cross-validation of two prognostic trauma scores in severely injured patients.两种创伤评分系统对严重创伤患者预后评估的交叉验证。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Dec;47(6):1837-1845. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01373-6. Epub 2020 Apr 22.