Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Orbital Unit, Academic Medical Centre of Amsterdam (AMC), Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Orbital Unit, Academic Medical Centre of Amsterdam (AMC), Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA), University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;46(4):715-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
Advanced three-dimensional (3D) diagnostics and preoperative planning are the first steps in computer-assisted surgery (CAS). They are an integral part of the workflow, and allow the surgeon to adequately assess the fracture and to perform virtual surgery to find the optimal implant position. The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and predictability of 3D diagnostics and preoperative virtual planning without intraoperative navigation in orbital reconstruction.
In 10 cadaveric heads, 19 complex orbital fractures were created. First, all fractures were reconstructed without preoperative planning (control group) and at a later stage the reconstructions were repeated with the help of preoperative planning. Preformed titanium mesh plates were used for the reconstructions by two experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeons. The preoperative virtual planning was easily accessible for the surgeon during the reconstruction. Computed tomographic scans were obtained before and after creation of the orbital fractures and postoperatively. Using a paired t-test, implant positioning accuracy (translation and rotations) of both groups were evaluated by comparing the planned implant position with the position of the implant on the postoperative scan.
Implant position improved significantly (P < 0.05) for translation, yaw and roll in the group with preoperative planning (Table 1). Pitch did not improve significantly (P = 0.78).
The use of 3D diagnostics and preoperative planning without navigation in complex orbital wall fractures has a positive effect on implant position. This is due to a better assessment of the fracture, the possibility of virtual surgery and because the planning can be used as a virtual guide intraoperatively. The surgeon has more control in positioning the implant in relation to the rim and other bony landmarks.
高级三维(3D)诊断和术前规划是计算机辅助手术(CAS)的第一步。它们是工作流程的一个组成部分,使外科医生能够充分评估骨折,并进行虚拟手术以找到最佳植入物位置。本研究的目的是评估在眼眶重建中无术中导航的情况下 3D 诊断和术前虚拟规划的准确性和可预测性。
在 10 个尸体头颅中,创建了 19 例复杂眼眶骨折。首先,所有骨折均未进行术前规划(对照组)进行重建,然后在稍后阶段借助术前规划重复重建。由两名经验丰富的口腔颌面外科医生使用预制钛网板进行重建。术前虚拟规划在重建过程中对外科医生来说很容易访问。在创建眼眶骨折之前和之后以及手术后均获得计算机断层扫描。使用配对 t 检验,通过将计划植入物位置与术后扫描上植入物的位置进行比较,评估两组的植入物定位准确性(平移和旋转)。
术前规划组的植入物位置在平移、偏航和滚动方面显著改善(P < 0.05)(表 1)。俯仰角没有显著改善(P = 0.78)。
在复杂眼眶壁骨折中使用无导航的 3D 诊断和术前规划对植入物位置有积极影响。这是由于对骨折的评估更好,虚拟手术的可能性以及因为规划可以用作术中的虚拟指南。外科医生在相对于边缘和其他骨标志定位植入物方面具有更多的控制权。