• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用选择性激光熔化(SLM)技术制作定制植入物(PSI)进行原发性眼眶重建:96例手术治疗患者的概述

Primary Orbital Reconstruction with Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of Patient-Specific Implants (PSIs): An Overview of 96 Surgically Treated Patients.

作者信息

Rana Majeed, Moellmann Henriette L, Schorn Lara, Lommen Julian, Rana Madiha, Wilkat Max, Hufendiek Karsten

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heinrich Heine University Duesseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Applied Sciences, Doberaner Weg 20, 22143 Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 11;11(12):3361. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123361.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11123361
PMID:35743432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9224837/
Abstract

Contemporary advances in technology have allowed the transfer of knowledge from industrial laser melting systems to surgery; such an approach could increase the degree of accuracy in orbital restoration. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of selective laser melted PSIs (patient-specific implants) and navigation in primary orbital reconstruction. Ninety-six patients with orbital fractures were included in this study. Planned vs. achieved orbital volumes (a) and angles (b) were compared to the unaffected side (n = 96). The analysis included the overlay of post-treatment on planned images (iPlan 3.0.5, Brainlab®, Feldkirchen, Germany). The mean difference in orbital volume between the digitally planned orbit and the postoperative orbit was 29.16 cm3 (SD 3.54, presurgical) to 28.33 cm3 (SD 3.64, postsurgical, t = 5.00, df = 95.00; p < 0.001), resulting in a mean volume difference (planned vs. postop) of less than 1 cm3. A 3D analysis of the color mapping showed minor deviations compared to the mirrored unaffected side. The results suggested that primary reconstruction in complex orbital wall fractures can be routinely achieved with a high degree of accuracy by using selective laser melted orbital PSIs.

摘要

当代技术的进步已使知识从工业激光熔化系统转移至外科手术;这种方法可提高眼眶修复的精确程度。本研究的目的是检验选择性激光熔化的个性化植入物(patient-specific implants,PSIs)及导航在眼眶一期重建中的准确性。本研究纳入了96例眼眶骨折患者。将计划的与实际获得的眼眶容积(a)和角度(b)与未受影响侧(n = 96)进行比较。分析包括将治疗后的图像叠加在计划图像上(iPlan 3.0.5,Brainlab®,德国费尔德kirchen)。数字化计划眼眶与术后眼眶之间的平均眼眶容积差异为29.16 cm³(术前标准差3.54)至28.33 cm³(术后标准差3.64,t = 5.00,自由度df = 95.00;p < 0.001),计划与术后的平均容积差异小于1 cm³。颜色映射的三维分析显示与镜像的未受影响侧相比存在微小偏差。结果表明,通过使用选择性激光熔化的眼眶个性化植入物,复杂眼眶壁骨折的一期重建可常规实现高度精确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/2841904aa59c/jcm-11-03361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/4d3ddc3d4269/jcm-11-03361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/cc61f5a65f62/jcm-11-03361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/b7b5d1dbd70d/jcm-11-03361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/2841904aa59c/jcm-11-03361-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/4d3ddc3d4269/jcm-11-03361-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/cc61f5a65f62/jcm-11-03361-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/b7b5d1dbd70d/jcm-11-03361-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5be0/9224837/2841904aa59c/jcm-11-03361-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Primary Orbital Reconstruction with Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of Patient-Specific Implants (PSIs): An Overview of 96 Surgically Treated Patients.采用选择性激光熔化(SLM)技术制作定制植入物(PSI)进行原发性眼眶重建:96例手术治疗患者的概述
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 11;11(12):3361. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123361.
2
Primary orbital reconstruction with selective laser melted core patient-specific implants: overview of 100 patients.采用选择性激光熔化定制植入物进行原发性眼眶重建:100例患者的概述
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Oct;57(8):782-787. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.07.012. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
3
Increasing the accuracy of orbital reconstruction with selective laser-melted patient-specific implants combined with intraoperative navigation.采用选择性激光熔覆定制植入物并结合术中导航提高眼眶重建的准确性。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Jun;73(6):1113-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
4
Prospective Evaluation of Two Wall Orbital Fractures Involving the Medial Orbital Wall: PSI Reconstruction versus PDS Repair-Worth the Effort?涉及眶内侧壁的两种眶壁骨折的前瞻性评估:PSI重建术与PDS修复术——值得付出努力吗?
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 27;12(9):1389. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091389.
5
Presurgical Virtual Planning and Intraoperative Navigation with 3D-Preformed Mesh: A New Protocol for Primary Orbital Fracture Reconstruction.使用三维预成型网片进行术前虚拟规划和术中导航:原发性眼眶骨折重建的新方案
Life (Basel). 2024 Apr 6;14(4):482. doi: 10.3390/life14040482.
6
Computer-Assisted Secondary Orbital Reconstruction.计算机辅助二次眼眶重建
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021 Mar;14(1):29-35. doi: 10.1177/1943387520935004. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
7
Patient specific implants (PSI) in reconstruction of orbital floor and wall fractures.个性化植入物在眼眶底壁骨折重建中的应用
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Jan;43(1):126-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.024. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
8
[Evaluation of the navigation system for orbital wall reconstruction in unilateral orbital fractures].[单侧眼眶骨折眼眶壁重建导航系统的评估]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Nov;47(11):657-61. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2012.11.004.
9
Late Reconstruction of the Orbit With Patient-Specific Implants Using Computer-Aided Planning and Navigation.使用计算机辅助规划和导航技术进行个性化植入物的眼眶晚期重建。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;73(12 Suppl):S101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2015.06.149.
10
Precision of posttraumatic primary orbital reconstruction using individually bent titanium mesh with and without navigation: a retrospective study.使用和不使用导航的个体化弯曲钛网进行创伤后原发性眼眶重建的精度:一项回顾性研究。
Head Face Med. 2013 Jul 2;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-9-18.

引用本文的文献

1
Intraoral Scanning Enables Virtual-Splint-Based Non-Invasive Registration Protocol for Maxillofacial Surgical Navigation.口腔内扫描可为颌面外科手术导航启用基于虚拟夹板的非侵入性配准方案。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 2;13(17):5196. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175196.
2
Probing real-world Central European population midfacial skeleton symmetry for maxillofacial surgery.探究中欧真实人口的面中部骨骼对称性在颌面外科中的应用。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5637-5647. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05185-x. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
3
Comparison of Anatomical Preformed Titanium Implants and Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Implants in the Primary Reconstruction of Isolated Orbital Fractures-A Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Personalized, 3D- printed fracture fixation plates versus commonly used orthopedic implant materials- biomaterials characteristics and bacterial biofilm formation.个性化、3D 打印骨折固定板与常用骨科植入材料的比较——生物材料特性和细菌生物膜形成。
Injury. 2022 Mar;53(3):938-946. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.12.020. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
2
Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.基于统计形状模型的眶底缺损的虚拟重建。
J Anat. 2022 Feb;240(2):323-329. doi: 10.1111/joa.13550. Epub 2021 Oct 17.
3
Functional and Cosmetic Outcome after Reconstruction of Isolated, Unilateral Orbital Floor Fractures (Blow-Out Fractures) with and without the Support of 3D-Printed Orbital Anatomical Models.
解剖预成型钛植入物与患者特异性计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)植入物在孤立性眼眶骨折一期重建中的比较——一项回顾性研究
J Pers Med. 2023 May 17;13(5):846. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050846.
4
Plasma Electrolytic Polished Patient-Specific Orbital Implants in Clinical Use-A Technical Note.临床应用中的等离子电解抛光定制眼眶植入物——技术说明
J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 11;13(1):148. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010148.
5
Prospective Evaluation of Two Wall Orbital Fractures Involving the Medial Orbital Wall: PSI Reconstruction versus PDS Repair-Worth the Effort?涉及眶内侧壁的两种眶壁骨折的前瞻性评估:PSI重建术与PDS修复术——值得付出努力吗?
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 27;12(9):1389. doi: 10.3390/jpm12091389.
在有和没有3D打印眼眶解剖模型支持的情况下,对孤立性单侧眼眶底骨折(爆裂性骨折)进行重建后的功能和美容效果
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 9;10(16):3509. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163509.
4
Technological Integration of Virtual Surgical Planning, Surgical Navigation, Endoscopic Support and Patient-Specific Implant in Orbital Trauma.虚拟手术规划、手术导航、内镜支持和定制植入物在眼眶创伤中的技术整合
J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021 Sep;20(3):459-463. doi: 10.1007/s12663-020-01423-x. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
5
Assessment of the Learning Curve for Virtual Surgical Planning in Orbital Fractures.眼眶骨折虚拟手术规划学习曲线的评估
Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2020 Sep;13(3):186-191. doi: 10.1177/1943387520923940. Epub 2020 May 5.
6
Susceptibility to biofilm formation on 3D-printed titanium fixation plates used in the mandible: a preliminary study.下颌骨使用的3D打印钛固定板上生物膜形成的易感性:一项初步研究。
J Oral Microbiol. 2020 Oct 29;12(1):1838164. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2020.1838164.
7
Assesing Intraoperative Virtual Navigation on My Craniofacial Surgery Fellowship for Orbital Fractures Repair: Is it Useful?评估我在颅面外科住院医师培训期间行眶骨骨折修复术中虚拟导航的作用:它有用吗?
J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):238-241. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006921.
8
The advantages of advanced computer-assisted diagnostics and three-dimensional preoperative planning on implant position in orbital reconstruction.先进的计算机辅助诊断和三维术前规划在眼眶重建中对植入物位置的优势。
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018 Apr;46(4):715-721. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Orbital floor fractures--short- and intermediate-term complications depending on treatment procedures.眶底骨折——短期和中期并发症取决于治疗方法。
Head Face Med. 2016 Jan 5;12:1. doi: 10.1186/s13005-015-0096-3.
10
The Role of Computer-Assisted Technology in Post-Traumatic Orbital Reconstruction: A PRISMA-driven Systematic Review.计算机辅助技术在创伤后眼眶重建中的作用:一项基于PRISMA的系统评价
Sci Rep. 2015 Dec 8;5:17914. doi: 10.1038/srep17914.