University of Florida Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 3063 Longleaf Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, United States.
University of Florida Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 3063 Longleaf Road, Gainesville, FL, 32608, United States.
Behav Res Ther. 2018 May;104:62-68. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
Although avoidance and escape behaviors each contribute to maintaining anxiety disorders, only avoidance completely eliminates exposure to the aversive context. Current research compared anticipatory defensive engagement when aversion could either be completely avoided or escaped after initial exposure; in addition, this research examined the impact of trait anxiety on coping-related defensive engagement. Cues signaled that upcoming rapid action would avoid (block), escape (terminate), or not affect subsequent aversive exposure; the acoustic startle reflex was measured during each anticipatory interval to index defensive engagement, and blink magnitudes were compared across low-, moderate-, and high-anxious individuals. For all participants, startle was potentiated when aversive exposure was uncontrollable and attenuated when aversion was avoidable. On escape trials, on the other hand, startle potentiation increased with rising participant anxiety. Results suggest 1) defensive engagement is generally reduced in avoidance contexts relative to contexts in which exposure is certain, and; 2) trait anxiety increases defensive engagement specifically when aversive exposure can be controlled but remains certain.
虽然回避和逃避行为都有助于维持焦虑障碍,但只有回避才能完全避免暴露于厌恶环境中。目前的研究比较了在最初暴露后可以完全避免或逃避厌恶时的预期防御参与;此外,本研究还考察了特质焦虑对与应对相关的防御参与的影响。线索表明,即将到来的快速动作将避免(阻止)、逃避(终止)或不影响随后的厌恶暴露;在每个预期间隔期间测量声惊反射,以指标防御参与,并且在低、中、高焦虑个体之间比较眨眼幅度。对于所有参与者,当厌恶暴露不可控时,惊跳反应增强,当回避可避免时,惊跳反应减弱。另一方面,在逃避试验中,随着参与者焦虑的增加,惊跳反应增强。结果表明,1)与暴露确定的情况相比,回避情况下的防御参与通常会减少;2)当厌恶暴露可以控制但仍然确定时,特质焦虑会增加防御参与。