• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

战地针刺治疗急诊科腰痛。

Battlefield acupuncture to treat low back pain in the emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, United States.

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):1045-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.02.038. Epub 2018 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2018.02.038
PMID:29550099
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Battlefield acupuncture (BFA) is an ear acupuncture protocol used by the military for immediate pain relief. This is a pilot feasibility study of BFA as a treatment for acute low back pain (LBP) in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Thirty acute LBP patients that presented to ED were randomized to standard care plus BFA or standard care alone. In the BFA group, outcomes were assessed at the time of randomization, 5 min after intervention, and again within 1 h after intervention. In the standard care group outcomes were assessed at the time of randomization and again an hour later. Primary outcomes included post-intervention LBP on a 10-point numeric pain rating scale (NRS) and the timed get-up-and-go test (GUGT). t-Test and chi squared tests were used to compare differences between groups demographics to evaluate randomization, and Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to assess differences in primary/secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

We randomized 15 patients to BFA plus standard care, and 15 patients to standard care alone. Demographics were similar between groups. Post-intervention LBP NRS was significantly lower in the BFA group compared with the standard care group (5.2 vs. 6.9, ANCOVA p = 0.04). GUGT was similar between groups (21.3 s vs. 19.0 s, ANCOVA p = 0.327). No adverse events from acupuncture were reported.

DISCUSSION

This pilot study demonstrates that BFA is feasible as a therapy for LBP in the ED. Furthermore, our data suggest that BFA may be efficacious to improve LBP symptoms, and thus further efficacy studies are warranted. (Clinicaltrials.gov registration number NCT02399969).

摘要

简介

战场针灸(BFA)是一种耳部针灸方案,被军方用于即时缓解疼痛。这是一项关于 BFA 治疗急诊急性腰痛(LBP)的初步可行性研究。

方法

30 名急性 LBP 患者被随机分为标准治疗加 BFA 组或单纯标准治疗组。在 BFA 组中,在随机分组时、干预后 5 分钟和干预后 1 小时评估结局。在标准治疗组中,在随机分组时和 1 小时后再次评估结局。主要结局指标包括干预后 10 点数字疼痛评分(NRS)和计时起身行走测试(GUGT)。使用 t 检验和卡方检验比较组间人口统计学差异以评估随机分组情况,使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)评估主要/次要结局的差异。

结果

我们将 15 名患者随机分配至 BFA 加标准治疗组,15 名患者分配至单纯标准治疗组。组间人口统计学特征相似。BFA 组干预后的 LBP NRS 明显低于标准治疗组(5.2 比 6.9,ANCOVA p=0.04)。GUGT 两组间相似(21.3 秒比 19.0 秒,ANCOVA p=0.327)。没有报告与针灸相关的不良事件。

讨论

这项初步研究表明,BFA 作为 ED 中 LBP 的治疗方法是可行的。此外,我们的数据表明 BFA 可能有效改善 LBP 症状,因此需要进一步的疗效研究。(临床试验注册号:NCT02399969)。

相似文献

1
Battlefield acupuncture to treat low back pain in the emergency department.战地针刺治疗急诊科腰痛。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;36(6):1045-1048. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.02.038. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
2
Battlefield Acupuncture Versus Standard Pharmacologic Treatment of Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.急诊中战场针灸与标准药物治疗腰痛的随机对照试验。
J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;61(4):406-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.07.017. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
3
An Adaptive Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Emergency Department Acupuncture for Acute Musculoskeletal Pain Management.适应型实用随机对照试验:急诊科针灸治疗急性肌肉骨骼疼痛管理。
Ann Emerg Med. 2024 Oct;84(4):337-350. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2024.03.014. Epub 2024 May 22.
4
Battlefield Acupuncture vs Ketorolac for Treating Pain in the Emergency Department.战地针刺疗法与酮咯酸治疗急诊科疼痛的对比研究
Fed Pract. 2023 Apr;40(4):110-115. doi: 10.12788/fp.0369. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Acupuncture in the emergency department for pain management: A BraveNet multi-center feasibility study.急诊科针刺治疗疼痛管理:BraveNet 多中心可行性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Mar 4;101(9):e28961. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028961.
6
Acupuncture as analgesia for non-emergent acute non-specific neck pain, ankle sprain and primary headache in an emergency department setting: a protocol for a parallel group, randomised, controlled pilot trial.急诊科针刺用于非紧急急性非特异性颈部疼痛、踝关节扭伤及原发性头痛的镇痛:一项平行组随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2014 Jun 12;4(6):e004994. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004994.
7
The Effectiveness and safety of T-MSAT on inpatients with acute low back pain caused by traffic accidents: A protocol for randomized controlled trial.T-MSAT治疗交通事故所致急性腰痛住院患者的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Feb 5;100(5):e23851. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023851.
8
Integrative Acupuncture and Spinal Manipulative Therapy Versus Either Alone for Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Feasibility Study.综合针灸与脊柱推拿疗法对比单独使用其中一种疗法治疗腰痛:一项随机对照试验可行性研究
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017 Mar-Apr;40(3):201-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
9
Efficacy and safety of thread embedding acupuncture for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled pilot trial.埋线针灸治疗慢性下腰痛的疗效与安全性:一项随机对照试验
Trials. 2018 Dec 12;19(1):680. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3049-x.
10
Battlefield Acupuncture for Adult Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.战场针刺治疗成人疼痛:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Chin Med. 2021;49(1):25-40. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X21500026. Epub 2020 Dec 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Practical Applications and Safety of Battlefield Acupuncture for Pain Management: A Systematic Literature Review.战场针刺疗法在疼痛管理中的实际应用与安全性:一项系统文献综述
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 May 17;18:2749-2769. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S517946. eCollection 2025.
2
Acupuncture in the emergency department (ACUITY): Results from a BraveNet multi-center feasibility randomized controlled trial.急诊科针灸治疗(ACUITY):一项BraveNet多中心可行性随机对照试验的结果
Integr Med Res. 2024 Dec;13(4):101095. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2024.101095. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
3
Methodological standards in the design and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in emergency medicine literature: a systematic review.
方法学标准在急诊医学文献中设计和报告的初步研究和可行性研究:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 11;14(11):e082648. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082648.
4
Addressing Occupational Back Pain: A Systematic Review of Preventive and Therapeutic Strategies.应对职业性背痛:预防与治疗策略的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Nov 13;15(11):e48744. doi: 10.7759/cureus.48744. eCollection 2023 Nov.
5
Battlefield Acupuncture vs Ketorolac for Treating Pain in the Emergency Department.战地针刺疗法与酮咯酸治疗急诊科疼痛的对比研究
Fed Pract. 2023 Apr;40(4):110-115. doi: 10.12788/fp.0369. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
6
Comparative effectiveness of electroacupuncture VS neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the treatment of chronic low back pain in active-duty personals: A single-center, randomized control study.电针与神经肌肉电刺激治疗现役人员慢性腰痛的比较效果:一项单中心随机对照研究。
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 13;13:945210. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.945210. eCollection 2022.
7
Clinical Review of Neuromusculoskeletal Complementary and Alternative Approaches for the Treatment of Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome.用于治疗慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的神经肌肉骨骼补充和替代疗法的临床综述
Cureus. 2022 Jul 20;14(7):e27077. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27077. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Acupuncture for Pain and Function in Patients with Nonspecific Low Back Pain: Study Protocol for an Up-to-Date Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.针刺治疗非特异性下腰痛患者的疼痛与功能:一项最新系统评价和荟萃分析的研究方案
J Pain Res. 2022 May 10;15:1379-1387. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S362980. eCollection 2022.
9
Acupuncture Therapy as an Evidence-Based Nonpharmacologic Strategy for Comprehensive Acute Pain Care: The Academic Consortium Pain Task Force White Paper Update.针刺疗法作为一种基于证据的非药物策略,用于全面急性疼痛管理:学术联盟疼痛工作组白皮书更新。
Pain Med. 2022 Aug 31;23(9):1582-1612. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnac056.
10
Combination of Battlefield Acupuncture and Local Point Acupuncture for Post Laparotomy Scar Pain.战地针刺与局部穴位针刺联合治疗剖腹术后瘢痕疼痛
Med Acupunct. 2022 Feb 1;34(1):66-70. doi: 10.1089/acu.2020.1522. Epub 2022 Feb 14.