Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden; Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, Nord University, 7713 Steinkjer, Norway.
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden.
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Nov;102(11):10423-10438. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-16416. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
With increasing intensification of the dairy sector in many countries and with the introduction of automatic milking, exercise paddocks combined with full indoor feeding, as an alternative to production pasture, are being used as a compromise between farm economics and cow welfare. This study examined whether there are production benefits for high-producing dairy cows in an alternative system that uses pasture at a level of approximately 50% of the total roughage intake in the diet. In an automatic milking system with 12-h night access to the outdoor environment, we compared milk production and behavior of cows in 2 systems: an exercise paddock combined with ad libitum grass silage indoor feeding and a production pasture combined with a restricted daytime grass silage ration. There were 20 cows in the former and 21 cows in the latter system, with the treatments running in parallel. The experiment started in late June with no complete darkness during the night, and lasted for 12 wk, with 5.6 h of darkness at the end. We therefore also explored the effect of night length on milk production and behavior parameters. All cows showed strong motivation for going outdoors and grazing when pasture access was given in early evening, but after a few hours both groups went to the barn and did not return to the pasture area during the remaining night. As the season progressed and nights became longer, cows on the exercise paddock treatment reduced time spent outdoors and grazing time, whereas they increased time spent resting outdoors. The group on exercise paddock had a greater milk yield (kg of milk) over the experimental period than the production pasture group. The latter group also showed a greater drop in milk yield over the duration of the trial. Thus, for cows milked in an automatic milking system and offered nighttime outdoor access, no milk production benefits were observed in offering production pasture with restricted indoor silage allowance instead of an exercise paddock with ad libitum silage. We therefore suggest that automatic milking farmers with similar production levels and automatic milking-management systems as in the present experiment, who wish to include grazed grass as part of the dairy cow diet, should ensure that cows have pasture access in the afternoon and evening.
随着许多国家乳业的集约化程度不断提高,以及自动挤奶的引入,作为农场经济和奶牛福利之间的妥协方案,运动场围栏结合完全室内喂养正被用于替代生产牧场。本研究旨在检验在一种替代系统中,对于高生产力奶牛是否存在生产效益,该系统中奶牛的日粮粗饲料约 50%由放牧获得。在一个 12 小时夜间可自由出入户外环境的自动挤奶系统中,我们比较了 2 种系统中奶牛的产奶量和行为:运动场围栏结合自由采食的青贮室外喂养,以及生产牧场结合限时白天青贮日粮。前一种系统中有 20 头奶牛,后一种系统中有 21 头奶牛,2 种处理同时进行。实验于 6 月下旬开始,此时夜间没有完全黑暗,持续了 12 周,最后 5.6 小时完全黑暗。因此,我们还探讨了夜间长度对产奶量和行为参数的影响。当傍晚允许放牧时,所有奶牛都表现出强烈的外出和放牧动机,但几个小时后,两组奶牛都去了牛舍,在剩余的夜间都没有返回牧场区域。随着季节的推进和夜晚的延长,运动场上的奶牛减少了户外活动时间和放牧时间,但增加了户外休息时间。与在生产牧场上的奶牛相比,在运动场上的奶牛在整个实验期间的产奶量(牛奶公斤数)更高。后者组在试验过程中牛奶产量下降幅度也更大。因此,对于在自动挤奶系统中挤奶并提供夜间户外通道的奶牛,提供限制室内青贮饲料允许量的生产牧场并没有观察到产奶量的增加,而不是使用运动场围栏并提供自由采食青贮饲料。因此,我们建议具有类似本实验中生产力水平和自动挤奶管理系统的自动挤奶农民,如果希望将放牧草作为奶牛饮食的一部分,应确保奶牛在下午和傍晚有牧场通道。