Suppr超能文献

爱泼斯坦-巴尔病毒和错配修复缺陷状态在食管癌和胃癌之间存在差异:一项大型多中心研究。

Epstein-Barr virus and mismatch repair deficiency status differ between oesophageal and gastric cancer: A large multi-centre study.

机构信息

Department of Pathology and GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Pathology and Tumour Biology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2018 May;94:104-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.02.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal (OeC) and gastric (GC) cancer patients are treated with similar multimodal therapy and have poor survival. There remains an urgent clinical need to identify biomarkers to individualise patient management and improve outcomes. Therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has shown promising results in other cancers. Proposed biomarkers to predict potential response to immune checkpoint inhibitors include DNA mismatch repair (MMR) and/or Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) status. The aim of this study was to establish and compare EBV status and MMR status in large multi-centre series of OeC and GC.

METHODS

EBV was assessed by EBV-encoded RNA (EBER) in situ hybridisation and MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 988 OeC and 1213 GC from multiple centres. In a subset of OeC, microsatellite instability (MSI) was tested in parallel with MMR IHC.

RESULTS

Frequency of MMR deficiency (MMRdef) and MSI was low in OeC (0.8% and 0.6%, respectively) compared with GC (10.3%). None of the OeCs were EBER positive in contrast to 4.8% EBER positive GC. EBV positive GC patients were younger (p = 0.01), more often male (p = 0.001) and had a better overall survival (p = 0.012). MMRdef GC patients were older (p = 0.001) and showed more often intestinal-type histology (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to date indicating that EBV and MMRdef do not play a role in OeC carcinogenesis in contrast to GC. The potential clinical usefulness of determining MMRdef/EBV status to screen patients for eligibility for immune-targeting therapy differs between OeC and GC patients.

摘要

背景

食管(OeC)和胃(GC)癌患者接受类似的多模式治疗,生存状况较差。目前迫切需要确定生物标志物,以实现个体化患者管理并改善预后。免疫检查点抑制剂在其他癌症中的治疗已显示出良好的效果。预测免疫检查点抑制剂潜在反应的拟议生物标志物包括 DNA 错配修复(MMR)和/或 EBV 状态。本研究旨在建立和比较大型多中心 OeC 和 GC 系列中的 EBV 状态和 MMR 状态。

方法

通过 EBV 编码的 RNA(EBER)原位杂交和免疫组化(IHC)评估 988 例 OeC 和 1213 例 GC 中的 EBV,来自多个中心。在 OeC 的亚组中,同时用 MMR IHC 测试微卫星不稳定性(MSI)。

结果

与 GC(10.3%)相比,OeC 的 MMR 缺陷(MMRdef)和 MSI 发生率较低(分别为 0.8%和 0.6%)。与 4.8%的 EBER 阳性 GC 相比,没有 OeC 呈 EBER 阳性。EBV 阳性 GC 患者更年轻(p=0.01),更多为男性(p=0.001),总生存时间更好(p=0.012)。MMRdef GC 患者年龄更大(p=0.001),更多表现为肠型组织学(p=0.022)。

结论

这是迄今为止最大的研究,表明 EBV 和 MMRdef 与 GC 相比,在 OeC 癌变中不起作用。确定 MMRdef/EBV 状态以筛选免疫靶向治疗合格患者的潜在临床用途在 OeC 和 GC 患者之间存在差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d146/5914544/dcad6444c7cf/figs1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验