Institute of Pathology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Department of Medical Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Histopathology. 2020 Apr;76(5):740-747. doi: 10.1111/his.14059.
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in-situ hybridisation and mismatch repair (MMR) protein immunohistochemistry identifies two subgroups of gastric cancer (GC) with high immunogenicity and likelihood for response to immune check-point inhibition. As tumour biology may change during the metastatic course, which can negatively influence the success of therapeutic decisions made on primary tissue, we investigated the consistency of GC EBV and MMR status within primary tumours and metastases.
We investigated a cohort of 415 primary resected GC, including 111 cases with corresponding distant metastases and 297 cases with lymph node metastases. Tumours were analysed by EBV in-situ hybridisation and MLH1, PMS2, MSH2 and MSH6 immunohistochemistry using tissue microarray technique. Primary tumours were grouped as EBV-positive MMR-proficient, EBV-negative MMR-deficient and EBV-negative MMR-proficient. Eleven of 415 (2.7%) of primary tumours were EBV-positive MMR-proficient, whereas 49 of 415 (11.8%) of tumours were EBV-negative MMR-deficient. EBV and MMR protein status showed full concordance with that of the primary tumours. MMR-deficient tumours were of lower pT-category (P < 0.001), had fewer lymph node metastases [24 of 49 (49%) versus 273 of 361 (75.6%) cases; P < 0.001] and a lower rate of distant metastases [six of 49 (12.2%) versus 105 of 366 (28.7%) cases; P = 0.015].
We demonstrate a strong correlation of EBV and MMR status between primary tumours, lymph node and distant metastases in a large series of primary resected GC. The cases showed the expected frequency of EBV-positive MMR-deficient and EBV-negative MMR-proficient tumours. We conclude that tissue testing for molecular subtyping for therapeutic decision-making can be reliably performed on primary tumours and metastases in GC.
EBV 原位杂交和错配修复(MMR)蛋白免疫组化鉴定了两种具有高免疫原性和对免疫检查点抑制反应可能性的胃癌(GC)亚组。由于肿瘤生物学可能在转移过程中发生变化,这可能会对基于原发组织做出的治疗决策的成功产生负面影响,因此我们研究了原发肿瘤和转移灶中 GC EBV 和 MMR 状态的一致性。
我们研究了 415 例原发性 GC 患者的队列,其中包括 111 例伴有远处转移的病例和 297 例伴有淋巴结转移的病例。使用组织微阵列技术,通过 EBV 原位杂交和 MLH1、PMS2、MSH2 和 MSH6 免疫组化分析肿瘤。将原发性肿瘤分为 EBV 阳性 MMR 功能正常、EBV 阴性 MMR 缺陷和 EBV 阴性 MMR 功能正常。415 例原发性肿瘤中,有 11 例(2.7%)为 EBV 阳性 MMR 功能正常,而 49 例(11.8%)为 EBV 阴性 MMR 缺陷。EBV 和 MMR 蛋白状态与原发性肿瘤完全一致。MMR 缺陷型肿瘤的 pT 分期较低(P<0.001),淋巴结转移较少[49 例中有 24 例(49%),361 例中有 273 例(75.6%);P<0.001],远处转移率较低[49 例中有 6 例(12.2%),366 例中有 105 例(28.7%);P=0.015]。
在一个大型原发性 GC 患者队列中,我们证明了 EBV 和 MMR 状态在原发肿瘤、淋巴结和远处转移之间具有很强的相关性。这些病例显示了 EBV 阳性 MMR 缺陷型和 EBV 阴性 MMR 功能正常型肿瘤的预期频率。我们得出结论,用于治疗决策的分子亚分型的组织检测可以可靠地在 GC 的原发性肿瘤和转移灶中进行。