• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

语言产生中的自适应控制是否由学习介导?

Is adaptive control in language production mediated by learning?

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, 1629 Thames Street, Suite 350, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, 1629 Thames Street, Suite 350, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA; Department of Cognitive Science, Johns Hopkins University, 1629 Thames Street, Suite 350, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:107-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.009
PMID:29550688
Abstract

Recent work using the Picture Word Interference (PWI) paradigm has revealed that language production, similar to non-verbal tasks, shows a robust Congruency Sequence Effect (CSE), defined as a decreased congruency effect following incongruent trials. Although CSE is considered an index of adaptive control, its mechanism is debated. In two experiments, we tested the predictions of a learning model of adaptive control in production, using a task-switching paradigm fully balanced to evaluate CSE on a PWI trial as a function of the congruency of a 2-back PWI trial (within-task CSE), as well as a 1-back trial belonging to a different task (cross-task CSE). The second task was a visuospatial task with congruent and incongruent trials in Experiment 1, and a self-paced reading task with ambiguous and unambiguous sentences in Experiment 2 that imposed a gap between the two PWI trials twice as long of that in Experiment 1. A learning model posits that CSE is the result of changes to the connection weights between task-specific representations and a control center, which leads to two predictions in our paradigm: (a) a robust within-task CSE unaffected by the intervening trial and the gap duration, and (b) an absent or reversed cross-task CSE. These predictions were contrasted with two versions of an activation model of CSE. In accord with the predictions of the learning model, we found robust within-task CSE in PWI in both Experiments with a comparable effect size. Similarly, evidence of within-task CSE was also found in the visuospatial and sentence reading tasks. On the other hand, examination of cross-task CSE from PWI to the other tasks and vice versa revealed either absent or reversed CSE. Collectively, these results support a learning model of adaptive control in language production.

摘要

最近使用图片词汇干扰范式(Picture Word Interference,PWI)的研究表明,语言产生与非言语任务相似,表现出强大的一致性序列效应(Congruency Sequence Effect,CSE),即紧随在不一致试验后的一致性效应减小。尽管 CSE 被认为是自适应控制的指标,但它的机制仍存在争议。在两项实验中,我们使用任务转换范式检验了自适应控制的学习模型的预测,该范式完全平衡,以评估作为前一个 PWI 试验一致性(任务内 CSE)的函数的 PWI 试验上的 CSE,以及属于不同任务的 1 个回溯试验(跨任务 CSE)。第二个任务是实验 1 中的视觉空间任务,包含一致和不一致的试验,以及实验 2 中的自定步速阅读任务,其中两个 PWI 试验之间的间隔是实验 1 的两倍。学习模型假定 CSE 是任务特定表示和控制中心之间的连接权重变化的结果,这导致我们的范式中有两个预测:(a)不受干预试验和间隔持续时间影响的强大任务内 CSE,以及(b)不存在或反转的跨任务 CSE。这些预测与 CSE 的两种激活模型版本进行了对比。与学习模型的预测一致,我们在两个实验中的 PWI 中均发现了强大的任务内 CSE,且效应大小相当。同样,在视觉空间和句子阅读任务中也发现了任务内 CSE 的证据。另一方面,对从 PWI 到其他任务以及反之的跨任务 CSE 的检查显示,要么不存在 CSE,要么出现反转。总体而言,这些结果支持语言产生中自适应控制的学习模型。

相似文献

1
Is adaptive control in language production mediated by learning?语言产生中的自适应控制是否由学习介导?
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:107-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
2
Different levels of learning interact to shape the congruency sequence effect.不同层次的学习相互作用,以塑造一致性序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(4):566-83. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000182. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
3
Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.在混杂最小化任务中,多种期望是一致性序列效应的基础。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102869. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102869. Epub 2019 Jun 19.
4
Control adjustments in speaking: Electrophysiology of the Gratton effect in picture naming.言语中的控制调整:图片命名中格拉顿效应的电生理学研究
Cortex. 2017 Jul;92:289-303. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.04.017. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
5
Adaptation to conflict frequency without contingency and temporal learning: Evidence from the picture-word interference task.无需应急和时间学习即可适应冲突频率:来自图片-词汇干扰任务的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Aug;45(8):995-1014. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000656. Epub 2019 May 30.
6
Determinants of congruency sequence effects without learning and memory confounds.无学习和记忆混淆的一致性序列效应的决定因素。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Oct;40(5):2022-2037. doi: 10.1037/a0037454. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
7
The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.一致性序列效应3.0:冲突适应的关键测试
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e110462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110462. eCollection 2014.
8
Cognitive control mechanisms in language processing: are there both within- and across-task conflict adaptation effects?语言加工中的认知控制机制:是否存在任务内和任务间冲突适应效应?
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Mar;76(3):649-671. doi: 10.1177/17470218221111789. Epub 2022 Sep 18.
9
Influence of homophone processing during auditory language comprehension on executive control processes: A dual-task paradigm.听觉语言理解过程中同音字处理对执行控制过程的影响:双任务范式。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 15;16(7):e0254237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254237. eCollection 2021.
10
Using Brain Potentials to Functionally Localise Stroop-Like Effects in Colour and Picture Naming: Perceptual Encoding versus Word Planning.利用脑电位在颜色和图片命名中对类似斯特鲁普效应进行功能定位:知觉编码与词汇规划
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 15;11(9):e0161052. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161052. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Cognitive control states and traits modulate lexical competition during word production.认知控制状态和特质在词汇生成过程中调节词汇竞争。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 14;15(1):25381. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10039-5.
2
Direct impact of cognitive control on sentence processing and comprehension.认知控制对句子处理和理解的直接影响。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021;36(2):211-239. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2020.1836379. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
Role of cognitive control in resolving two types of conflict during spoken word production.认知控制在解决口语产生过程中两种冲突类型中的作用。
Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2023;38(8):1082-1097. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2023.2202917. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
4
Precision of phonological errors in aphasia supports resource models of phonological working memory in language production.失语症患者语音错误的精确性支持语言产生中语音工作记忆的资源模型。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb;40(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2023.2206012. Epub 2023 May 1.
5
A Comprehension- or a Production-Based Monitor? Response to Roelofs (2020).基于理解还是基于产出的监控器?对罗洛夫斯(2020年)的回应。
J Cogn. 2020 Sep 3;3(1):19. doi: 10.5334/joc.102.
6
Neural Dynamics of Cognitive Control in Various Types of Incongruence.不同类型不一致情况下认知控制的神经动力学
Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Jun 5;14:214. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.00214. eCollection 2020.
7
Cognitive Control Facilitates Attentional Disengagement during Second Language Comprehension.认知控制有助于第二语言理解过程中的注意力脱离。
Brain Sci. 2019 Apr 27;9(5):95. doi: 10.3390/brainsci9050095.