• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

失语症患者语音错误的精确性支持语言产生中语音工作记忆的资源模型。

Precision of phonological errors in aphasia supports resource models of phonological working memory in language production.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition (CNBC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb;40(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2023.2206012. Epub 2023 May 1.

DOI:10.1080/02643294.2023.2206012
PMID:37127940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336978/
Abstract

Working memory (WM) is critical for many cognitive functions including language production. A key feature of WM is its capacity limitation. Two models have been proposed to account for such capacity limitation: slot models and resource models. In recent years, resource models have found support in both visual and auditory perception, but do they also extend to production? We investigate this by analyzing sublexical errors from four individuals with aphasia. Using tools from computational linguistics, we first define the concept of "precision" of sublexical errors. We then demonstrate that such precision decreases with increased working memory load, i.e., word length, as predicted by resource models. Finally, we rule out alternative accounts of this effect, such as articulatory simplification. These data provide the first evidence for the applicability of the resource model to production and further point to the generalizability of this account as a model of resource division in WM.

摘要

工作记忆(WM)对于包括语言产生在内的许多认知功能都至关重要。WM 的一个关键特征是其容量限制。有两种模型被提出来解释这种容量限制:槽模型和资源模型。近年来,资源模型在视觉和听觉感知中都得到了支持,但它们是否也适用于产生?我们通过分析四位失语症患者的亚词汇错误来研究这一点。我们首先使用计算语言学工具来定义亚词汇错误的“精度”概念。然后,我们证明这种精度随着工作记忆负荷(即词长)的增加而降低,这与资源模型的预测一致。最后,我们排除了这种效应的替代解释,例如发音简化。这些数据首次提供了资源模型适用于产生的证据,并进一步指出了该解释作为 WM 中资源分配模型的普遍性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/8028819975e3/nihms-1900033-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/d1c9e91300d6/nihms-1900033-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/82f36e54022d/nihms-1900033-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/cb6a404c2ec7/nihms-1900033-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/c63de7d75624/nihms-1900033-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/8028819975e3/nihms-1900033-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/d1c9e91300d6/nihms-1900033-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/82f36e54022d/nihms-1900033-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/cb6a404c2ec7/nihms-1900033-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/c63de7d75624/nihms-1900033-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/717a/10336978/8028819975e3/nihms-1900033-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Precision of phonological errors in aphasia supports resource models of phonological working memory in language production.失语症患者语音错误的精确性支持语言产生中语音工作记忆的资源模型。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2023 Feb;40(1):1-24. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2023.2206012. Epub 2023 May 1.
2
Contributions of semantic and phonological working memory to narrative language independent of single word production: Evidence from acute stroke.语义和语音工作记忆对独立于单个单词产生的叙事语言的贡献:来自急性中风的证据。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2022 Jul-Dec;39(5-8):296-324. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2023.2186782. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
3
The role of input vs. output phonological working memory in narrative production: Evidence from case series and case study approaches.输入与输出语音工作记忆在叙事生成中的作用:来自病例系列和病例研究方法的证据。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2024 Feb-Mar;41(1-2):70-92. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2024.2366467. Epub 2024 Jun 27.
4
Contribution of articulatory rehearsal to short-term memory: evidence from a case of selective disruption.发音复述对短期记忆的作用:来自一例选择性破坏的证据。
Brain Lang. 1992 Nov;43(4):713-46. doi: 10.1016/0093-934x(92)90092-s.
5
The linguistic constraints of precision of verbal working memory.言语工作记忆精度的语言限制。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1464-1485. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01283-5. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
6
Effects of working memory load on processing of sounds and meanings of words in aphasia.工作记忆负荷对失语症患者单词声音和意义加工的影响。
Aphasiology. 2012 Mar;26(3-4):462-493. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.619516. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
7
Unification of behavioural, computational and neural accounts of word production errors in post-stroke aphasia.将行为、计算和神经方法对中风后失语症中单词产生错误的解释统一起来。
Neuroimage Clin. 2018 Mar 27;18:952-962. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.031. eCollection 2018.
8
Triangulation of language-cognitive impairments, naming errors and their neural bases post-stroke.脑卒中后语言认知障碍、命名错误及其神经基础的三角剖分。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Nov 6;17:465-473. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.10.037. eCollection 2018.
9
The Meeting Point: Where Language Production and Working Memory Share Resources.交汇点:语言生成与工作记忆共享资源之处。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2019 Feb;48(1):61-79. doi: 10.1007/s10936-018-9589-0.
10
Short-Term Memory and Aphasia: From Theory to Treatment.短期记忆与失语症:从理论到治疗
Semin Speech Lang. 2017 Feb;38(1):17-28. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597261. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Is working memory domain-general or domain-specific?工作记忆是领域一般性的还是领域特殊性的?
Trends Cogn Sci. 2024 Nov;28(11):1023-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2024.06.006. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Phonological Working Memory Representations in the Left Inferior Parietal Lobe in the Face of Distraction and Neural Stimulation.面对分心和神经刺激时左顶下叶的语音工作记忆表征
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jun 23;16:890483. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.890483. eCollection 2022.
2
Distinct Neural Substrates Support Phonological and Orthographic Working Memory: Implications for Theories of Working Memory.不同的神经基质支持语音和正字法工作记忆:对工作记忆理论的启示
Front Neurol. 2021 Aug 4;12:681141. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.681141. eCollection 2021.
3
Working Memory Capacities Neurally Dissociate: Evidence from Acute Stroke.
工作记忆容量的神经分离:来自急性中风的证据。
Cereb Cortex Commun. 2021 Jan 28;2(2):tgab005. doi: 10.1093/texcom/tgab005. eCollection 2021.
4
Maintaining verbal short-term memory representations in non-perceptual parietal regions.在非感知顶叶区域中维持言语短期记忆表征。
Cortex. 2021 May;138:72-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
5
Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength.心理物理标度揭示了视觉记忆强度的统一理论。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1156-1172. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00938-0. Epub 2020 Sep 7.
6
The dual origin of semantic errors in access deficit: activation vs. inhibition deficit.注意缺陷障碍中语义错误的双重起源:激活不足与抑制不足。
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb-Mar;36(1-2):31-53. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2019.1587397. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
7
A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory.人类视觉工作记忆中集合大小效应的资源理性理论。
Elife. 2018 Aug 7;7:e34963. doi: 10.7554/eLife.34963.
8
Failure of self-consistency in the discrete resource model of visual working memory.视觉工作记忆离散资源模型中的自我一致性失败。
Cogn Psychol. 2018 Sep;105:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 3.
9
"Twisting fingers": The case for interactivity in typed language production.“扭手指”:打字语言生成中的交互性案例。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1449-1457. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1452-7.
10
Is adaptive control in language production mediated by learning?语言产生中的自适应控制是否由学习介导?
Cognition. 2018 Jul;176:107-130. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.03.009. Epub 2018 Mar 20.