Winters Anne E, White Andrew M, Dewi Ariyanti S, Mudianta I Wayan, Wilson Nerida G, Forster Louise C, Garson Mary J, Cheney Karen L
School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
J Chem Ecol. 2018 Apr;44(4):384-396. doi: 10.1007/s10886-018-0941-5. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
Many plants and animals store toxic or unpalatable compounds in tissues that are easily encountered by predators during attack. Defensive compounds can be produced de novo, or obtained from dietary sources and stored directly without selection or modification, or can be selectively sequestered or biotransformed. Storage strategies should be optimized to produce effective defence mechanisms but also prevent autotoxicity of the host. Nudibranch molluscs utilize a diverse range of chemical defences, and we investigated the accumulation and distribution of defensive secondary metabolites in body tissues of 19 species of Chromodorididae nudibranchs. We report different patterns of distribution across tissues, where: 1) the mantle had more or different (but structurally related) compounds than the viscera; 2) all compounds in the mantle were also in the viscera; and 3) the mantle had fewer compounds than the viscera. We found no further examples of species that selectively store a single compound, previously reported in Chromodoris species. Consistent with other studies, we found high concentrations of metabolites in mantle rim tissues compared to the viscera. Using bioassays, compounds in the mantle were more toxic than compounds found in the viscera for Glossodoris vespa Rudman, 1990 and Ceratosoma brevicaudatum Abraham, 1876. In G. vespa, compounds in the mantle were also more unpalatable to palaemonid shrimp than compounds found in the viscera. This indicates that these species may modify compounds to increase bioactivity for defensive purposes and/or selectively store more toxic compounds. We highlight clear differences in the storage of sequestered chemical defences, which may have important implications for species to employ effective defences against a range of predators.
许多动植物会将有毒或难吃的化合物储存在组织中,在受到攻击时,这些组织很容易被捕食者接触到。防御性化合物可以重新合成,或者从食物来源获取并直接储存,无需筛选或修饰,也可以被选择性地隔离或生物转化。储存策略应进行优化,以产生有效的防御机制,同时防止宿主自身中毒。裸鳃亚目软体动物利用多种化学防御手段,我们研究了19种多彩海牛科裸鳃亚目动物体内组织中防御性次生代谢物的积累和分布情况。我们报告了不同组织间的分布模式,即:1)外套膜中的化合物比内脏中的更多或不同(但结构相关);2)外套膜中的所有化合物在内脏中也有;3)外套膜中的化合物比内脏中的少。我们没有发现像之前在多彩海牛属物种中报道的那样选择性储存单一化合物的物种的更多实例。与其他研究一致,我们发现与内脏相比,外套膜边缘组织中的代谢物浓度更高。通过生物测定,对于1990年描述的黄蜂多彩海牛和1876年描述的短尾角海牛,外套膜中的化合物比内脏中的化合物毒性更大。在黄蜂多彩海牛中,与内脏中的化合物相比,外套膜中的化合物对虾蛄科虾类也更难吃。这表明这些物种可能会对化合物进行修饰以提高其防御生物活性和/或选择性地储存更多有毒化合物。我们强调了隔离化学防御储存方面的明显差异,这可能对物种采用有效的防御手段对抗一系列捕食者具有重要意义。