UCLA Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2970-2987. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12822. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
To evaluate national present-on-admission (POA) reporting for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) and examine the impact of quality measure exclusion criteria on HAPU rates.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Medicare inpatient, outpatient, and nursing facility data as well as independent provider claims (2010-2011).
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We evaluated acute inpatient hospital admissions among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries in 2011. Admissions were categorized as follows: (1) no pressure ulcer diagnosis, (2) new pressure ulcer diagnosis, and (3) previously documented pressure ulcer diagnosis. HAPU rates were calculated by varying patient exclusion criteria.
Among admissions with a pressure ulcer diagnosis, we observed a large discrepancy in the proportion of admissions with a HAPU based on hospital-reported POA data (5.2 percent) and the proportion with a new pressure ulcer diagnosis based on patient history in billing claims (49.7 percent). Applying quality measure exclusion criteria resulted in removal of 91.2 percent of admissions with a pressure injury diagnosis from HAPU rate calculations.
As payers and health care organizations expand the use of quality measures, it is important to consider how the measures are implemented, coding revisions to improve measure validity, and the impact of patient exclusion criteria on provider performance evaluation.
评估医院获得性压疮(HAPU)的现行入院时(POA)报告情况,并考察质量衡量标准排除标准对 HAPU 发生率的影响。
数据来源/研究范围:医疗保险住院、门诊和护理机构数据以及独立供应商索赔(2010-2011 年)。
回顾性横断面研究。
数据收集/提取方法:我们评估了 2011 年医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)受益人的急性住院入院情况。入院情况分为以下几类:(1)无压疮诊断,(2)新压疮诊断,以及(3)先前有压疮诊断记录。通过改变患者排除标准来计算 HAPU 发生率。
在有压疮诊断的入院中,我们观察到基于医院报告的 POA 数据(5.2%)和基于计费索赔中患者病史的新压疮诊断比例(49.7%)之间,HAPU 发生率存在很大差异。应用质量衡量标准排除标准会导致将 91.2%的压疮诊断入院从 HAPU 发生率计算中删除。
随着支付方和医疗保健组织扩大质量衡量标准的使用,重要的是要考虑措施的实施方式、改进衡量标准有效性的编码修订,以及患者排除标准对提供者绩效评估的影响。