Suppr超能文献

在诊断为压力性溃疡的住院按服务收费的 Medicare 患者中评估入院时即存在的指标:编码模式及其对医院获得性压力性溃疡发生率的影响。

Evaluation of the Present-on-Admission Indicator among Hospitalized Fee-for-Service Medicare Patients with a Pressure Ulcer Diagnosis: Coding Patterns and Impact on Hospital-Acquired Pressure Ulcer Rates.

机构信息

UCLA Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2970-2987. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12822. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate national present-on-admission (POA) reporting for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers (HAPUs) and examine the impact of quality measure exclusion criteria on HAPU rates.

DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: Medicare inpatient, outpatient, and nursing facility data as well as independent provider claims (2010-2011).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We evaluated acute inpatient hospital admissions among Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries in 2011. Admissions were categorized as follows: (1) no pressure ulcer diagnosis, (2) new pressure ulcer diagnosis, and (3) previously documented pressure ulcer diagnosis. HAPU rates were calculated by varying patient exclusion criteria.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Among admissions with a pressure ulcer diagnosis, we observed a large discrepancy in the proportion of admissions with a HAPU based on hospital-reported POA data (5.2 percent) and the proportion with a new pressure ulcer diagnosis based on patient history in billing claims (49.7 percent). Applying quality measure exclusion criteria resulted in removal of 91.2 percent of admissions with a pressure injury diagnosis from HAPU rate calculations.

CONCLUSIONS

As payers and health care organizations expand the use of quality measures, it is important to consider how the measures are implemented, coding revisions to improve measure validity, and the impact of patient exclusion criteria on provider performance evaluation.

摘要

目的

评估医院获得性压疮(HAPU)的现行入院时(POA)报告情况,并考察质量衡量标准排除标准对 HAPU 发生率的影响。

数据来源/研究范围:医疗保险住院、门诊和护理机构数据以及独立供应商索赔(2010-2011 年)。

研究设计

回顾性横断面研究。

数据收集/提取方法:我们评估了 2011 年医疗保险按服务收费(FFS)受益人的急性住院入院情况。入院情况分为以下几类:(1)无压疮诊断,(2)新压疮诊断,以及(3)先前有压疮诊断记录。通过改变患者排除标准来计算 HAPU 发生率。

主要发现

在有压疮诊断的入院中,我们观察到基于医院报告的 POA 数据(5.2%)和基于计费索赔中患者病史的新压疮诊断比例(49.7%)之间,HAPU 发生率存在很大差异。应用质量衡量标准排除标准会导致将 91.2%的压疮诊断入院从 HAPU 发生率计算中删除。

结论

随着支付方和医疗保健组织扩大质量衡量标准的使用,重要的是要考虑措施的实施方式、改进衡量标准有效性的编码修订,以及患者排除标准对提供者绩效评估的影响。

相似文献

2
Consistency of pressure injury documentation across interfacility transfers.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):182-189. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006726. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
3
Examination of the accuracy of coding hospital-acquired pressure ulcer stages.
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Dec 24;3(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.04.b03. eCollection 2013.
8
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 3. The Methods, Models, and Forecasts of Sepsis, 2012-2018.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):302-318. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004225.
9
New approaches to measuring the comprehensiveness of primary care physicians.
Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr;54(2):356-366. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13101. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
10
Sepsis Among Medicare Beneficiaries: 2. The Trajectories of Sepsis, 2012-2018.
Crit Care Med. 2020 Mar;48(3):289-301. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004226.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Using administrative discharge diagnoses to track hospital-acquired pressure ulcer incidence--limitations, links, and leaps.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2015 Jun;41(6):243-5. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(15)41033-5.
2
3
Effect of Present-on-Admission (POA) Reporting Accuracy on Hospital Performance Assessments Using Risk-Adjusted Mortality.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Jun;50(3):922-38. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12239. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
4
Examination of the accuracy of coding hospital-acquired pressure ulcer stages.
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2013 Dec 24;3(4). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.003.04.b03. eCollection 2013.
6
Impact of present-on-admission indicators on risk-adjusted hospital mortality measurement.
Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1298-306. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828e12b3.
7
Hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: results from the national Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System study.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012 Sep;60(9):1603-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04106.x.
8
The accuracy of present-on-admission reporting in administrative data.
Health Serv Res. 2011 Dec;46(6pt1):1946-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01300.x. Epub 2011 Aug 11.
9
Annual checkup: the CMS pressure ulcer present-on-admission indicator.
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009 Oct;22(10):476-84. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000361385.97489.51.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验