• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

退伍军人事务部有优势吗?来自双重资格退伍军人的证据。

Is There a VA Advantage? Evidence from Dually Eligible Veterans.

作者信息

Chan David C, Card David, Taylor Lowell

机构信息

Stanford University, Department of Veterans Affairs, and NBER.

UC Berkeley and NBER.

出版信息

Am Econ Rev. 2023 Nov;113(11):3003-3043. doi: 10.1257/aer.20211638.

DOI:10.1257/aer.20211638
PMID:39816722
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11735001/
Abstract

We study public versus private provision of health care for veterans aged 65 and older who may receive care provided by the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and in private hospitals financed by Medicare. Utilizing the ambulance design of Doyle et al. (2015), we find that the VA reduces 28-day mortality by 46 percent (4.5 percentage points) and that these survival gains are persistent. The VA also reduces 28-day spending by 21 percent and delivers strikingly different reported services relative to private hospitals. We find suggestive evidence of complementarities between continuity of care, health IT, and integrated care.

摘要

我们研究了65岁及以上退伍军人的公共与私人医疗保健服务提供情况,这些退伍军人可能接受美国退伍军人事务部(VA)提供的医疗服务,以及由医疗保险资助的私立医院的医疗服务。利用多伊尔等人(2015年)的“救护车”设计,我们发现退伍军人事务部将28天死亡率降低了46%(4.5个百分点),而且这些生存获益是持续的。退伍军人事务部还将28天的支出降低了21%,并且与私立医院相比,提供的报告服务显著不同。我们发现了护理连续性、健康信息技术和综合护理之间互补性的暗示性证据。

相似文献

1
Is There a VA Advantage? Evidence from Dually Eligible Veterans.退伍军人事务部有优势吗?来自双重资格退伍军人的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2023 Nov;113(11):3003-3043. doi: 10.1257/aer.20211638.
2
Duplicate federal payments for dual enrollees in Medicare Advantage plans and the Veterans Affairs health care system.医疗保险优势计划和退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中双重参保人的重复联邦支付。
JAMA. 2012 Jul 4;308(1):67-72. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.7115.
3
Increasing use of Medicare services by veterans with acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死退伍军人对医疗保险服务的使用增加。
Med Care. 1999 Jun;37(6):529-37. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199906000-00002.
4
Federal Payments for Coronary Revascularization Procedures Among Dual Enrollees in Medicare Advantage and the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.医疗保险优势计划和退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中双重参保者的冠状动脉血运重建术的联邦支付。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e201451. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1451.
5
Service utilization of veterans dually eligible for VA and Medicare fee-for-service: 1999-2004.1999 - 2004年同时符合退伍军人事务部(VA)和医疗保险服务收费条件的退伍军人的服务利用情况。
Medicare Medicaid Res Rev. 2012 Oct 19;2(3). doi: 10.5600/mmrr.002.03.a06. eCollection 2012.
6
Dialysis Initiation and Mortality Among Older Veterans With Kidney Failure Treated in Medicare vs the Department of Veterans Affairs.在 Medicare 和 Veterans Affairs 治疗的老年肾衰竭退伍军人中,透析开始与死亡率的比较。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 May 1;178(5):657-664. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0411.
7
Mortality among US veterans after emergency visits to Veterans Affairs and other hospitals: retrospective cohort study.美国退伍军人在退伍军人事务部和其他医院急诊后死亡率:回顾性队列研究。
BMJ. 2022 Feb 16;376:e068099. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068099.
8
Use of VA and Medicare services by dually eligible veterans with psychiatric problems.患有精神疾病的双重资格退伍军人对退伍军人事务部(VA)和医疗保险服务的使用情况。
Health Serv Res. 2008 Aug;43(4):1164-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00840.x. Epub 2008 Mar 17.
9
Studying outcomes and hospital utilization in the elderly. The advantages of a merged data base for Medicare and Veterans Affairs hospitals.研究老年人的治疗结果及医院利用率。医疗保险和退伍军人事务医院合并数据库的优势。
Med Care. 1992 May;30(5):377-91. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199205000-00001.
10
Mortality of Department of Veterans Affairs patients undergoing coronary revascularization in private sector hospitals.在私立医院接受冠状动脉血运重建术的退伍军人事务部患者的死亡率。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1802-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00720.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Emergency Department Physician Admitting Practices and Subsequent Mortality.急诊科医生收治方式的差异与后续死亡率
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Feb 1;185(2):153-160. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.6925.
2
Interhospital transfer among US veterans admitted to community and veterans affairs hospitals for acute myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.2019冠状病毒病大流行之前及期间,美国退伍军人在社区医院和退伍军人事务医院因急性心肌梗死和缺血性中风住院后的院间转诊情况。
J Hosp Med. 2025 Feb;20(2):155-166. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13515. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Public and Private Options in Practice: The Military Health System.实践中的公共与私人选择:军事卫生系统
Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2023 Nov;15(4):37-74. doi: 10.1257/pol.20210625.
2
Selection with Variation in Diagnostic Skill: Evidence from Radiologists.诊断技能存在差异情况下的选择:来自放射科医生的证据。
Q J Econ. 2022 Jan 21;137(2):729-783. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab048. eCollection 2022 May.
3
Place-Based Drivers of Mortality: Evidence from Migration.基于地点的死亡驱动因素:来自移民的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2021 Aug;111(8):2697-2735. doi: 10.1257/aer.20190825.
4
Mortality Effects and Choice Across Private Health Insurance Plans.私人医疗保险计划中的死亡率影响与选择
Q J Econ. 2021 Aug;136(3):1557-1610. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjab017. Epub 2021 May 6.
5
Does When You Die Depend on Where You Live? Evidence from Hurricane Katrina.你的死亡时间取决于你的居住地吗?来自卡特里娜飓风的证据。
Am Econ Rev. 2020 Nov;110(11):3602-3033. doi: 10.1257/aer.20181026.
6
Veterans' Use of Veterans Health Administration Primary Care in an Era of Expanding Choice.退役军人在选择范围扩大的时代对退伍军人健康管理局初级保健的使用情况。
Med Care. 2021 Jun 1;59(Suppl 3):S292-S300. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001554.
7
IDENTIFYING SOURCES OF INEFFICIENCY IN HEALTHCARE.识别医疗保健中的低效根源。
Q J Econ. 2020 May;135(2):785-843. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjz040. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
Upcoding: Evidence from Medicare on Squishy Risk Adjustment.高编计费:来自医疗保险关于模糊风险调整的证据。
J Polit Econ. 2020 Mar;12(3):984-1026. doi: 10.1086/704756. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
9
The impacts of private hospital entry on the public market for elective care in England.私立医院进入对英格兰择期医疗公共市场的影响。
J Health Econ. 2020 Sep;73:102353. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102353. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
10
Swamped: Emergency Department Crowding and Patient Mortality.不堪重负:急诊科拥挤与患者死亡率
J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;70:102279. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2019.102279. Epub 2019 Dec 28.