Public Health Computational and Operations Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Global Obesity Prevention Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Mar 19;12(3):e0006337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006337. eCollection 2018 Mar.
The 2020 Sustainable Development goals call for 100% certified interruption or control of the three main forms of Chagas disease transmission in Latin America. However, how much will achieving these goals to varying degrees control Chagas disease; what is the potential impact of missing these goals and if they are achieved, what may be left?
We developed a compartmental simulation model that represents the triatomine, human host, and non-human host populations and vector-borne, congenital, and transfusional T. cruzi transmission between them in the domestic and peridomestic settings to evaluate the impact of limiting transmission in a 2,000 person virtual village in Yucatan, Mexico.
Interruption of domestic vectorial transmission had the largest impact on T. cruzi transmission and prevalence in all populations. Most of the gains were achieved within the first few years. Controlling vectorial transmission resulted in a 46.1-83.0% relative reduction in the number of new acute Chagas cases for a 50-100% interruption in domestic vector-host contact. Only controlling congenital transmission led to a 2.4-8.1% (30-100% interruption) relative reduction in the total number of new acute cases and reducing only transfusional transmission led to a 0.1-0.3% (30-100% reduction). Stopping all three forms of transmission resulted in 0.5 total transmission events over five years (compared to 5.0 with no interruption); interrupting all forms by 30% resulted in 3.4 events over five years per 2,000 persons.
While reducing domestic vectorial, congenital, and transfusional transmission can successfully reduce transmission to humans (up to 82% in one year), achieving the 2020 goals would still result in 0.5 new acute cases per 2,000 over five years. Even if the goals are missed, major gains can be achieved within the first few years. Interrupting transmission should be combined with other efforts such as a vaccine or improved access to care, especially for the population of already infected individuals.
2020 年可持续发展目标呼吁拉丁美洲实现三种主要形式的恰加斯病传播 100%经证实阻断或控制。然而,在不同程度上实现这些目标将在多大程度上控制恰加斯病;错过这些目标的潜在影响是什么,如果实现了这些目标,可能会留下什么?
我们开发了一个隔室模拟模型,代表了在国内和周边环境中锥虫、人类宿主和非人类宿主种群以及媒介传播、先天和输血传播之间的联系,以评估在墨西哥尤卡坦州一个 2000 人虚拟村庄中限制传播的影响。
阻断国内媒介传播对所有人群中锥虫传播和流行的影响最大。大多数收益在最初几年内实现。控制媒介传播导致新急性恰加斯病例数量减少 46.1-83.0%,国内媒介-宿主接触中断 50-100%。只有控制先天性传播才能导致新急性病例总数减少 2.4-8.1%(中断 30-100%),而减少输血传播仅导致 0.1-0.3%(中断 30-100%)。停止所有三种传播形式导致五年内总传播事件为 0.5 次(无中断时为 5.0 次);中断所有形式的 30%会导致五年内每 2000 人有 3.4 次事件。
虽然减少国内媒介、先天和输血传播可以成功减少向人类传播(一年内可达 82%),但到 2020 年仍将导致五年内每 2000 人有 0.5 例新急性病例。即使目标没有实现,最初几年也可以取得重大进展。中断传播应与疫苗或改善获得治疗的机会等其他努力结合使用,特别是针对已经感染人群。