Masud Aisha, Shafi Shahram, Rao Babar K
Department of Dermatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Dermatology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Cutis. 2018 Feb;101(2):141-144.
The utilization of mobile applications (apps) as educational resources for patients highlights the need for an objective method of evaluating the quality of health care-related mobile apps. In this study, a quantified rubric was developed to objectively grade publicly available dermatology mobile apps with the primary focus of patient education. The rubric included 5 criteria thought to be most important in evaluating the adequacy of these apps in relaying health information to patients: educational objectives, content, accuracy, design, and conflict of interest. A 4-point scale was applied to each criterion. The use of this objective rubric could have implications in the evaluation and recommendation of mobile health care apps as a vital educational resource for patients.
将移动应用程序(应用)用作患者的教育资源凸显了对一种评估与医疗保健相关的移动应用质量的客观方法的需求。在本研究中,开发了一种量化评分标准,以客观地对公开可用的皮肤病学移动应用进行评分,主要侧重于患者教育。该评分标准包括5个标准,这些标准被认为在评估这些应用向患者传递健康信息的充分性方面最为重要:教育目标、内容、准确性、设计和利益冲突。每个标准采用4分制。这种客观评分标准的使用可能会对移动医疗保健应用作为患者重要教育资源的评估和推荐产生影响。