Suppr超能文献

根据绝对风险水平进行降压药物治疗的有效性:澳大利亚国家血压研究的事后分析

Effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering drug treatment by levels of absolute risk: post hoc analysis of the Australian National Blood Pressure Study.

作者信息

Ho Chau Le Bao, Breslin Monique, Doust Jenny, Reid Christopher M, Nelson Mark R

机构信息

Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.

Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 19;8(3):e017723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017723.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

In many current guidelines, blood pressure (BP)-lowering drug treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is based on absolute risk. However, in clinical practice, therapeutic decisions are often based on BP levels alone. We sought to investigate which approach was superior by conducting a post hoc analysis of the Australian National Blood Pressure (ANBP) cohort, a seminal study establishing the efficacy of BP lowering in 'mild hypertensive' persons.

DESIGN

A post hoc subgroup analysis of the ANBP trial results by baseline absolute risk tertile.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

3244 participants aged 35-69 years in a community-based randomised placebo controlled trial of blood pressure-lowering medication.

INTERVENTIONS

Chlorothiazide500 mg versus placebo.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

All-cause mortality and non-fatal events (non-fatal CVD, congestive cardiac failure, renal failure, hypertensive retinopathy or encephalopathy).

RESULTS

Treatment effects were assessed by HR, absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat. Participants had an average 5-year CVD risk in the intermediate range (10.5±6.5) with moderately elevated BP (mean 159/103 mmHg) and were middle aged (52±8 years). In a subgroup analysis, the relative effects (HR) and absolute effects (absolute risk reduction and number needed to treat) did not statistically differ across the three risk groups except for the absolute benefit in all-cause mortality (p for heterogeneity=0.04). With respect to absolute benefit, drug treatment significantly reduced the number of events in the high-risk group regarding any event with a number needed to treat of 18 (10 to 64), death from any cause with 45 (25 to 196) and major CVD events with 23 (12 to 193).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis confirms that the benefit of treatment was substantial only in the high-risk tertile, reaffirming the rationale of treating elevated blood pressure in the setting of all risk factors rather than in isolation.

摘要

目的

在许多现行指南中,用于心血管疾病(CVD)一级预防的降压药物治疗是基于绝对风险。然而,在临床实践中,治疗决策往往仅基于血压水平。我们通过对澳大利亚国家血压(ANBP)队列进行事后分析,来探究哪种方法更具优势,该队列研究是一项确立了降压对“轻度高血压”患者有效性的开创性研究。

设计

根据基线绝对风险三分位数对ANBP试验结果进行事后亚组分析。

设置与参与者

3244名年龄在35 - 69岁的参与者,参与一项基于社区的降压药物随机安慰剂对照试验。

干预措施

氯噻嗪500毫克与安慰剂对比。

主要结局指标

全因死亡率和非致死性事件(非致死性CVD、充血性心力衰竭、肾衰竭、高血压性视网膜病变或脑病)。

结果

通过风险比(HR)、绝对风险降低率和需治疗人数来评估治疗效果。参与者的平均5年CVD风险处于中等范围(10.5±6.5),血压中度升高(平均159/103毫米汞柱),且为中年(52±8岁)。在亚组分析中,除全因死亡率的绝对获益外(异质性p值 = 0.04),三个风险组的相对效应(HR)和绝对效应(绝对风险降低率和需治疗人数)在统计学上无差异。就绝对获益而言,药物治疗显著降低了高风险组中任何事件的发生数量,需治疗人数为18(10至64),任何原因导致的死亡需治疗人数为45(25至196),主要CVD事件需治疗人数为23(12至193)。

结论

我们的分析证实,仅在高风险三分位数组中治疗获益显著,重申了在综合所有风险因素而非孤立地看待血压升高时进行治疗的合理性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba48/5875665/b4050c54acc5/bmjopen-2017-017723f01.jpg

相似文献

2
Benefit and harm of intensive blood pressure treatment: Derivation and validation of risk models using data from the SPRINT and ACCORD trials.
PLoS Med. 2017 Oct 17;14(10):e1002410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002410. eCollection 2017 Oct.
9
10
Patient Selection for Intensive Blood Pressure Management Based on Benefit and Adverse Events.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Apr 27;77(16):1977-1990. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.058.

引用本文的文献

2
Hypertensive retinopathy and cardiovascular disease risk: 6 population-based cohorts meta-analysis.
Int J Cardiol Cardiovasc Risk Prev. 2023 Mar 5;17:200180. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcrp.2023.200180. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The Wider Considerations in Closing Chronic Disease Gaps - Focus on Heart Failure and Implementation.
Curr Cardiol Rev. 2023;19(2):e120522204690. doi: 10.2174/1573403X18666220512160737.
5
Gazing through time and beyond the health sector: Insights from a system dynamics model of cardiovascular disease in Australia.
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 30;16(9):e0257760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257760. eCollection 2021.
6
Identifying Who Improves or Maintains Their Food Literacy Behaviours after Completing an Adult Program.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 21;17(12):4462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124462.
7
Do patients or their physicians more accurately assess long-term risk associated with hypertension? A population-based study.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Jun;38(2):166-175. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1753345. Epub 2020 May 2.
8
Identifying Participants Who Would Benefit the Most from an Adult Food-literacy Program.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;16(7):1272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071272.
9
Effectiveness of an Adult Food Literacy Program.
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 7;11(4):797. doi: 10.3390/nu11040797.
10
Renal Artery Denervation for Hypertension.
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019 Feb 14;21(2):7. doi: 10.1007/s11936-019-0715-6.

本文引用的文献

3
Blood-Pressure Lowering in Intermediate-Risk Persons without Cardiovascular Disease.
N Engl J Med. 2016 May 26;374(21):2009-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1600175. Epub 2016 Apr 2.
4
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
6
Effects of blood pressure reduction in mild hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Feb 3;162(3):184-91. doi: 10.7326/M14-0773.
8
Blood pressure-lowering treatment based on cardiovascular risk: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Lancet. 2014 Aug 16;384(9943):591-598. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61212-5.
10
Groups spar over new hypertension guidelines.
JAMA. 2014 Feb 19;311(7):663-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.440.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验