• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定最能从成人食品素养计划中受益的参与者。

Identifying Participants Who Would Benefit the Most from an Adult Food-literacy Program.

机构信息

School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia.

Foodbank Western Australia, Perth Airport 6105, Australia.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;16(7):1272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071272.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph16071272
PMID:30970671
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6480264/
Abstract

Food literacy programs aim to improve behaviours required to achieve a quality diet. The objectives of this study were to assess the demographic, food literacy related and dietary behaviour of participants enrolling in Food Sensations for Adults, a free four-week food literacy program and identify the subgroup of participants who benefit most. Cross-sectional pre-program questionnaire data (n = 1626) from participants enrolling in the program was used to stratify into low, middle and high food-literacy tertiles. Factor scores from a reliability analysis of food literacy behaviours were then used to produce a composite score). Participants were 80.2% female, 56% aged 26 to 45 years and 73.3% from low to middle socio-economic areas. Demographic characteristics were not a significant predictor of the lowest composite food-literacy group. Those with the lowest composite food-literacy tertile score were more likely to have lower self-rated cooking skills, a negative attitude to the cost of healthy foods, lower intakes of fruits and vegetables and a higher frequency of consuming takeaway food and sugary drinks. Food literacy programs must focus on recruiting those who have low self-rated cooking skills, who consider healthy foods expensive and have poor dietary intakes and will most likely to benefit from such programs.

摘要

食品素养计划旨在改善实现优质饮食所需的行为。本研究的目的是评估参加成人食品感官(Food Sensations for Adults)这一免费四周食品素养计划的参与者的人口统计学、与食品素养相关的行为和饮食行为,并确定受益最大的亚组人群。该计划参与者在参加计划前的问卷调查数据(n = 1626)被用于分层为低、中、高食品素养三分位数。对食品素养行为的可靠性分析的因子得分,然后用于生成综合得分。参与者中 80.2%为女性,56%年龄在 26 至 45 岁之间,73.3%来自社会经济水平较低到中等的地区。人口统计学特征并不是最低复合食品素养组的显著预测因素。那些综合食品素养最低三分位数得分的人更有可能自评烹饪技能较低,对健康食品的成本持消极态度,水果和蔬菜的摄入量较低,外出就餐和含糖饮料的频率较高。食品素养计划必须专注于招募那些自评烹饪技能较低、认为健康食品昂贵、饮食摄入较差的人,他们最有可能从这些计划中受益。

相似文献

1
Identifying Participants Who Would Benefit the Most from an Adult Food-literacy Program.确定最能从成人食品素养计划中受益的参与者。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 9;16(7):1272. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16071272.
2
Identifying Who Improves or Maintains Their Food Literacy Behaviours after Completing an Adult Program.确定谁在完成成人项目后改善或保持其食物素养行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 21;17(12):4462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124462.
3
Associations of food choice values and food literacy with overall diet quality: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japanese adults.食物选择价值观和食物素养与总体饮食质量的关联:日本成年人的全国性横断面研究。
Br J Nutr. 2023 Nov 28;130(10):1795-1805. doi: 10.1017/S000711452300082X. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
4
Examining the Association between Food Literacy and Food Insecurity.探讨食品素养与食品不安全之间的关系。
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 20;11(2):445. doi: 10.3390/nu11020445.
5
The influence of socio-demographic, psychological and knowledge-related variables alongside perceived cooking and food skills abilities in the prediction of diet quality in adults: a nationally representative cross-sectional study.社会人口统计学、心理和知识相关变量以及感知烹饪和食物技能能力对成年人饮食质量预测的影响:一项全国代表性横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Oct 26;13(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12966-016-0440-4.
6
Community-based cooking programme 'Eat Better Feel Better' can improve child and family eating behaviours in low socioeconomic groups.以社区为基础的烹饪项目“吃得更好感觉更好”可以改善社会经济地位较低群体的儿童和家庭的饮食行为。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Feb;74(2):190-196. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-211773. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
7
Effectiveness of an Adult Food Literacy Program.成人食品素养计划的有效性。
Nutrients. 2019 Apr 7;11(4):797. doi: 10.3390/nu11040797.
8
Effectiveness of a food literacy and positive feeding practices program for parents of 0 to 5 years olds in Western Australia.西澳大利亚地区针对 0 至 5 岁儿童家长的食品素养与正向喂养实践项目的效果。
Health Promot J Austr. 2024 Apr;35(2):263-275. doi: 10.1002/hpja.742. Epub 2023 May 9.
9
Electronic Health Literacy and Dietary Behaviors in Taiwanese College Students: Cross-Sectional Study.台湾大学生的电子健康素养与饮食行为:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 26;21(11):e13140. doi: 10.2196/13140.
10
The association of highly processed food consumption with food choice values and food literacy in Japanese adults: a nationwide cross-sectional study.日本成年人中高度加工食品消费与食物选择价值观和食物素养的关联:一项全国性横断面研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Dec 5;20(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01538-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Maternal nutrition literacy and childhood obesity in food-insecure and secure households.粮食不安全和安全家庭中的孕产妇营养知识与儿童肥胖
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 4;15(1):11656. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95044-4.
2
A virtual culinary medicine intervention for ethnically diverse individuals with type 2 diabetes: development of the Nourishing the Community through Culinary Medicine.一项针对不同种族2型糖尿病患者的虚拟烹饪医学干预措施:通过烹饪医学滋养社区项目的开发。
Front Nutr. 2024 Aug 16;11:1383621. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1383621. eCollection 2024.
3
Perceived nutrition needs of people experiencing disadvantage in utilizing support services: An Australian case study.弱势群体在利用支持服务方面的营养需求认知:一项澳大利亚案例研究。
Food Sci Nutr. 2024 Mar 6;12(6):4133-4142. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.4072. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Level of happiness and its association with food literacy among Seoul citizens: results from Seoul Food Survey 2021.首尔市民的幸福水平及其与食品素养的关联:2021年首尔食品调查结果
Nutr Res Pract. 2024 Feb;18(1):119-131. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2024.18.1.119. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
5
Who has a high level of food literacy, and who does not?: a qualitative study of college students in South Korea.谁具备较高的食品素养,谁又不具备?对韩国大学生的一项定性研究
Nutr Res Pract. 2023 Dec;17(6):1155-1169. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.6.1155. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
6
The level of food literacy and its association with food intake and obesity status among Seoul citizens: results from Seoul Food Survey 2021.首尔市民的食品素养水平及其与食物摄入量和肥胖状况的关联:2021年首尔食品调查结果
Nutr Res Pract. 2023 Oct;17(5):945-958. doi: 10.4162/nrp.2023.17.5.945. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
7
Exploring the Impact of Sociodemographic Characteristics and Health Literacy on Adherence to Dietary Recommendations and Food Literacy.探讨社会人口特征和健康素养对饮食建议依从性和食品素养的影响。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 23;15(13):2853. doi: 10.3390/nu15132853.
8
The Connection between Non-Alcoholic Fatty-Liver Disease, Dietary Behavior, and Food Literacy in German Working Adults.非酒精性脂肪肝疾病、饮食行为与德国家庭劳动者食物素养的关联。
Nutrients. 2023 Jan 27;15(3):648. doi: 10.3390/nu15030648.
9
Association between the dietary literacy of children's daily diet providers and school-age children's nutritional status and eating behaviours: a cross-sectional study.儿童日常饮食提供者的饮食素养与学龄儿童营养状况和饮食行为之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 6;22(1):2286. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14621-8.
10
How a 7-Week Food Literacy Cooking Program Affects Cooking Confidence and Mental Health: Findings of a Quasi-Experimental Controlled Intervention Trial.为期7周的食物素养烹饪项目如何影响烹饪信心和心理健康:一项准实验性对照干预试验的结果
Front Nutr. 2022 Mar 17;9:802940. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.802940. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthy Eating: Approaching the Selection, Preparation, and Consumption of Healthy Food as Choice Behavior.健康饮食:将健康食品的选择、准备和食用视为选择行为来对待。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jan 24;42(3):647-674. doi: 10.1007/s40614-018-00190-y. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Complexities in Conceptualizing and Measuring Food Literacy.概念化和衡量食品素养的复杂性。
J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019 Apr;119(4):563-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2018.10.015. Epub 2019 Jan 19.
3
Very Low Food Security Status is Related to Lower Cooking Self-Efficacy and Less Frequent Food Preparation Behaviors Among College Students.极低的粮食安全状况与大学生较低的烹饪自我效能感及较少的食物准备行为频率相关。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Mar;51(3):357-363. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
4
Food insecurity and food preparation equipment in US households: exploratory results from a cross-sectional questionnaire.美国家庭的粮食不安全和粮食准备设备:横断面问卷调查的探索性结果。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2019 Apr;32(2):143-151. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12615. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Evaluation Tool Development for Food Literacy Programs.食品素养计划评估工具的开发。
Nutrients. 2018 Nov 2;10(11):1617. doi: 10.3390/nu10111617.
6
Barriers to Food Literacy: A Conceptual Model to Explore Factors Inhibiting Proficiency.食物素养的障碍:一个探索抑制熟练程度因素的概念模型。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2019 Jan;51(1):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.08.008. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
7
What Social, Program, and Behavioral Factors Influence the Healthy Eating Index for EFNEP and SNAP-Ed Adult Participants?哪些社会、项目和行为因素会影响参与推广营养教育计划(EFNEP)和补充营养援助计划教育拓展项目(SNAP-Ed)的成年人的健康饮食指数?
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015 Oct 7;11(4):344-353. doi: 10.1177/1559827615607194. eCollection 2017 Jul-Aug.
8
Sociodemographic characteristics and frequency of consuming home-cooked meals and meals from out-of-home sources: cross-sectional analysis of a population-based cohort study.社会人口学特征与在家就餐和外出就餐频率:基于人群的横断面分析。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Aug;21(12):2255-2266. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018000812. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
9
Effectiveness of blood pressure-lowering drug treatment by levels of absolute risk: post hoc analysis of the Australian National Blood Pressure Study.根据绝对风险水平进行降压药物治疗的有效性:澳大利亚国家血压研究的事后分析
BMJ Open. 2018 Mar 19;8(3):e017723. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017723.
10
Self-Perceived Cooking Skills in Emerging Adulthood Predict Better Dietary Behaviors and Intake 10 Years Later: A Longitudinal Study.成年初显期自我感知的烹饪技能可预测 10 年后更好的饮食行为和摄入量:一项纵向研究。
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 May;50(5):494-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.01.021. Epub 2018 Mar 7.