Ueno Satoru, Kitagawa Yasuhide, Onozawa Mizuki, Hinotsu Shiro, Akaza Hideyuki, Mizokami Atsushi, Namiki Mikio
Department of Integrative Cancer Therapy and Urology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan.
Department of Urology, Tokyo-kita Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Prostate Int. 2018 Mar;6(1):7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
This prospective observational study elucidated the usefulness of hormonal therapy for localized prostate cancer. Background factors and the health-related quality of life in patients who initially underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) or primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) for localized prostate cancer are summarized.
Patients aged 67-76 years with clinical stage T1c or T2 localized prostate cancer treated with PADT or RP, a prostate-specific antigen concentration of <20 ng/mL, and Gleason score of ≤7 were included. Health-related quality of life results estimated by the Medical Outcomes Study 8-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-8) and the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) were investigated.
In total, 850 patients who underwent RP and 370 patients who underwent PADT were enrolled. The proportion of patients with comorbidities of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and/or cerebrovascular disease was greater in the PADT group than in the RP group. The proportion of patients deciding on treatment was significantly higher in the PADT group than in the RP group. In the RP group, the scores of many SF-8 and EPIC domains decreased at 3 months following surgery and returned to baseline levels at 1 year. In the PADT group, several domains gradually decreased during the year after treatment initiation. The proportion of patients with decreased satisfaction scores at 1 year compared with baseline was lower in the PADT group than that in the RP group.
Treatment risk influenced decisions on primary treatment for localized prostate cancer. Although there was a selection bias, short-term overall satisfaction in the PADT group was superior to that in the RP group in this clinical study.
这项前瞻性观察性研究阐明了激素疗法对局限性前列腺癌的有效性。总结了最初接受根治性前列腺切除术(RP)或原发性雄激素剥夺疗法(PADT)治疗局限性前列腺癌患者的背景因素和健康相关生活质量。
纳入年龄在67 - 76岁、临床分期为T1c或T2局限性前列腺癌、接受PADT或RP治疗、前列腺特异性抗原浓度<20 ng/mL且Gleason评分≤7的患者。研究通过医学结局研究8项简表健康调查(SF - 8)和扩展前列腺癌指数综合量表(EPIC)评估的健康相关生活质量结果。
总共纳入了850例行RP的患者和370例行PADT的患者。PADT组中患有高血压、心血管疾病和/或脑血管疾病合并症的患者比例高于RP组。PADT组中决定接受治疗的患者比例显著高于RP组。在RP组中,许多SF - 8和EPIC领域的评分在术后3个月下降,并在1年时恢复到基线水平。在PADT组中,几个领域在治疗开始后的一年内逐渐下降。与基线相比,PADT组1年时满意度评分降低的患者比例低于RP组。
治疗风险影响局限性前列腺癌初始治疗的决策。尽管存在选择偏倚,但在本临床研究中,PADT组的短期总体满意度优于RP组。