• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无针迷你吊带“吊床”和“U形”构型治疗压力性尿失禁的随机前瞻性比较:18个月随访结果

A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling "hammock" and "U-shape" configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 18 month follow-up results.

作者信息

Dogan Ozan, Basbug Alper, Kaya Aski Ellibes, Pulatoglu Cigdem, Yassa Murat

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Sciences University, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Research and Training Hospital, Binbasi Refikbey sk, No: 9/5 Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duzce University Faculty of Medicine, Duzce, Turkey.

出版信息

Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;297(6):1483-1493. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4755-z. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

DOI:10.1007/s00404-018-4755-z
PMID:29556707
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of needleless mini-sling placed either retropubic (U-shape) or trans-obturator (hammock-shape) to treat stress urinary incontinence.

SETTING

One hundred and twenty six women were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive hammock-shaped or U-shaped of Contasure-NDL.

METHODS

All surgical procedures were performed by one senior surgeon experienced in anti-incontinence surgery with mesh. Cough-stress test was considered for objective outcome. Subjective outcomes consisted of International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Short Form (ICIQ-SF), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and three-item Likert scale to measure satisfaction. Assessments were performed preoperatively and at postoperative 6th, 12th and 18th month.

RESULTS

The objective cure rates at postoperative 6th and 12th month were significantly lower in U-shape group compared to hammock-shape group (85.4 vs. 96.4%; p = 0.034) and was comparable with hammock-shape group at 18 month postoperative (90.2 vs. 96.4%, respectively; p = 0.216). The subjective cure rates at postoperative 6th, 12th and 18th month were similar between groups (90.2/90.2/100% vs. 96.4/96.4/96.4%, respectively; p > 0.05). Median of total ICIQ-SF scores was significantly lower in hammock-shaped group (1.62 ± 2.92) compared to U-shape (3.80 ± 2.64) at 18th month (p < 0.001). The rate of patients reported as very satisfied or satisfied to the Likert scale was 90.2% in U-shape group and 96.4% in hammock group. Patients' responses to PGI-I were majorly distributed to "much better" and "very much better" with a mean score of 1.93 ± 2 in U-shape and 1.33 ± 1 in hammock group at 18th month of follow-up (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

U-shape placement of needleless single-incision mini-sling mimicking the retropubic route did not satisfy in achieving the patient's goal when compared to hammock-shape placement.

摘要

目的

比较耻骨后(U形)或经闭孔(吊床形)放置无针迷你吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效。

背景

126名女性按2:1的比例随机分组,接受吊床形或U形的Contasure-NDL吊带。

方法

所有手术均由一名有抗尿失禁手术网片经验的资深外科医生进行。以咳嗽压力试验作为客观疗效指标。主观疗效指标包括国际尿失禁咨询问卷简表(ICIQ-SF)、患者总体改善印象(PGI-I)以及用于衡量满意度的三项李克特量表。在术前以及术后第6、12和18个月进行评估。

结果

术后第6个月和12个月时,U形组的客观治愈率显著低于吊床形组(分别为85.4%对96.4%;p = 0.034),术后18个月时与吊床形组相当(分别为90.2%对96.4%;p = 0.216)。术后第6、12和18个月时,两组的主观治愈率相似(分别为90.2/90.2/100%对96.4/96.4/96.4%;p > 0.05)。在第18个月时,吊床形组的ICIQ-SF总分中位数(1.62 ± 2.92)显著低于U形组(3.80 ± 2.64)(p < 0.001)。在李克特量表中,报告非常满意或满意的患者比例在U形组为90.2%,在吊床形组为96.4%。在随访的第18个月,患者对PGI-I的回答主要分布在“好多了”和“非常好多了”,U形组的平均评分为1.93 ± 2,吊床形组为1.33 ± 1(p < 0.001)。

结论

与吊床形放置相比,模仿耻骨后路径的无针单切口迷你吊带U形放置在实现患者目标方面并不理想。

相似文献

1
A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling "hammock" and "U-shape" configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 18 month follow-up results.无针迷你吊带“吊床”和“U形”构型治疗压力性尿失禁的随机前瞻性比较:18个月随访结果
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Jun;297(6):1483-1493. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4755-z. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
2
A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling "hammock" and "U-shape" configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 60-month follow-up results.一种无针迷你吊带“吊床”和“U 形”构型用于治疗压力性尿失禁的随机前瞻性比较:60 个月随访结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1733-1738. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07567-2. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.单切口无针(Contasure-needleless®)迷你吊带与经闭孔由内向外(Contasure-KIM®)中尿道吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照比较:24个月随访结果
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
4
Comparison of the efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator (TVT-O) and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape (Ajust™) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a 1-year follow-up randomized trial.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术(TVT-O)与单切口无张力阴道吊带(Ajust™)治疗女性压力性尿失禁的疗效比较:一项为期1年的随访随机试验。
Int Urogynecol J. 2016 Oct;27(10):1497-505. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3012-x. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
5
A new validated score for detecting patient-reported success on postoperative ICIQ-SF: a novel two-stage analysis from two large RCT cohorts.一种用于检测患者报告的术后ICIQ-SF成功情况的新验证评分:来自两个大型随机对照试验队列的新型两阶段分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Jan;28(1):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3070-0. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Efficacy of tension-free vaginal tape obturator and single-incision tension-free vaginal tape-Secur, hammock approach, in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.无张力阴道吊带闭孔术及单切口无张力阴道吊带-Secur吊带法(吊床入路)治疗压力性尿失禁的疗效
Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2014 Sep;66(3):165-73.
7
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.女性尿失禁的单切口吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 1(6):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub2.
8
Two new mini-slings compared with transobturator tension-free vaginal tape for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A 1-year follow-up randomized controlled trial.两种新型迷你吊带与经闭孔无张力阴道吊带治疗压力性尿失禁的比较:一项1年随访的随机对照试验
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2016 Dec;42(12):1773-1781. doi: 10.1111/jog.13143. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
9
Mid-urethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women.女性压力性尿失禁的中段尿道吊带手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 1(7):CD006375. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006375.pub3.
10
A randomized comparison of a single-incision midurethral sling and a transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: results of 12-mo follow-up.经阴道单切口和经闭孔尿道中段吊带治疗女性压力性尿失禁的随机对照研究:12 个月随访结果。
Eur Urol. 2014 Dec;66(6):1179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.027. Epub 2014 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Instruments Used for the Assessment of SUI Severity in Urogynecologic Surgical Trials: A Scoping Review.用于妇科泌尿外科学手术试验中压力性尿失禁严重程度评估的器械:一项范围综述
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Dec;35(12):2255-2279. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05934-w. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
2
A randomized prospective comparison of the needleless mini-sling "hammock" and "U-shape" configurations for management of stress urinary incontinence: 60-month follow-up results.一种无针迷你吊带“吊床”和“U 形”构型用于治疗压力性尿失禁的随机前瞻性比较:60 个月随访结果。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Sep;310(3):1733-1738. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07567-2. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
3
Single-incision sling operations for urinary incontinence in women.
经阴道单切口吊带术治疗女性尿失禁。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 27;10(10):CD008709. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008709.pub4.
4
The International Urogynecological Association/International Continence Society classification of complications of prosthesis and graft insertion: Pros and cons and a review of the literature.国际尿控协会/国际尿失禁学会关于假体及移植物植入并发症的分类:利弊及文献综述
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2020 Mar 6;21(1):57-61. doi: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2019.2019.0036. Epub 2019 Jul 31.